similar to: 0.99.10-test7

http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/ - Hopefully OpenSSL is fixed :) - We sometimes produced invalid ENVELOPE with 8bit headers. That could really have broken things (broke it in test12). So, what's left is to make PAM work well..

http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/ Again major maildir syncing updates: - uidlist file is accessed and rewritten a lot less often now than before - mail duplicates are detected and handled properly by renaming them to new base name - message flag updates and expunging before did two full syncs for cur/ directory. now it does only one. - some fixes to syncing in read-only / out-of-quota

Hiya builds fine on BSD now (thanks) Now I am getting index corruption again May 30 03:11:53 snigger imap(bob): Corrupted binary tree file /home/bob/Mail/.INBOX/.imap.index.tree: UID to be inserted isn't higher than existing (1 <= 1) and so on until the client hangs test7 is stable here. Also what are the correct permissions for /var/run/dovecot/login? I get a message about correcting

Fixed all the reported bugs. Changed PAM service to "dovecot". Anything left? http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/rc/

I'm trying to use this to test an IMAP server I'm developing (I picked the nightly up from the link on the wiki page at http://www.imapwiki.org/ImapTest/Installation). With one client using the mailbox dovecot-crlf (http://www.dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-crlf) I get messages like: Error: test at npsl.co.uk[67]: 1035253882.5041.34.camel at hurina: Header From changed 'Timo Sirainen

Hi Dovecot: 2.2.19.rc2 OS: CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core) FS: XFS Problem: Dovecot it does not include line breaks in the letter. Bug or feautre? Message size in fs: 1125 bytes Message: From cras at irccrew.org Tue Jul 23 19:39:23 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list dovecot); Tue, 23 Jul 2002 19:39:23 +0300 (EEST) Return-Path: <cras at irccrew.org> Delivered-To: dovecot

Again at http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/ if someone wants to test it. - new index file code should work now - mbox support is completely broken - caching isn't very smart yet. it always caches only what client requested at the time - header caching might have some problems actually now that I think of it.. I was anyway going to change a bit how it worked.

http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/ I should have released 0.99.10 already I think.. There's just two annoying problems that I think should be fixed first: - PAM: If user gives a wrong password, dovecot-auth process sleeps for two seconds, blocking everyone else who are trying to authenticate at the time. So using PAM isn't very good idea at the moment. - OpenSSL problems. Are they

http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/ Maildir syncing now works pretty much as described in my earlier mail. It was quite a large change, so please test this :) So the new and great features: - It's faster. - If someone renames maildir file just before we try to use it, we now resync the maildir and try to find it again. Before we just failed. It's also possible that the filename changed

Home again. Fixed SSL checking for Redhat 9, I hope. Could someone test if it actually works now? Also fixed a few compiler warnings. If this thing works, I'll just update the NEWS file and call it 0.99.10. http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/rc/ Near future plans include rewriting parts of index handling. At least .tree file will go, I've a _much_ better idea how to replace it. .data file is

OK, I really should release 0.99.8 final soon, but not just yet :) Mostly just documentation updates left I think. There's a few recent changes that might have some nasty bugs: - problems with copying messages from mbox to another should be fixed now - LIST and subscription handling rewritten. - "mail_read_mmaped = no" used to corrupt mboxes when expunging messages. It now enabled

This is a bit of a late reply, but still: On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 15:06, Timo Sirainen wrote: > CVS has been optimized to assume all files beginning with a dot (except > .subscriptions currently) are mailboxes. This is faster since it doesn't > have to stat() each file to figure out if it's a directory or not. > Perhaps that should be optional. New Linux systems (maybe others

Hi, just started using dovecot on FreeBSD. Nice and easy to configure :-) I then wanted to browse the dovecot mailing list, so, according to http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/mailinglists.html: IMAP archives available from dovecot.procontrol.fi, either use ANONYMOUS authentication or give anonymous as username and empty password. I was using a patched sylpheed that doesn't support

0.99.9 should really be released soon. There's been quite a lot of important fixes since 0.99.8.1. There's still some recent counter strangeness, but it wasn't perfect before either. mbox still doesn't necessarily notice flag changes unless they're written into index file (ie. non-Dovecots and Dovecot without index files). But it wasn't perfect before either.

http://dovecot.org/test/ Lots of bugfixes related to syncing. There's still some left. Somewhat working mbox support: - combined syncing/rewriting uses much less disk I/O than with older mbox code - expunges aren't working yet - last-uid field in X-IMAPbase header isn't updated - it's currently syncing the whole mbox constantly even if it hasn't changed - it

On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 14:15, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 03:31, james broermann wrote: > > pine still doesn't want to work. It does detect that the server is using > > plain text passwords. I'll try the sniffer and see what turns up. > > Whops, you're right. I've tested pine only with digest-md5 > authentication before. Looks like my

Again all the recently reported bugs fixed. Hopefully last rc. http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/rc/

> >Message: 2 >Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 13:21:08 +0200 (CEST) >From: Andreas Aardal Hanssen <dovecot at andreas.hanssen.name> >Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Multiple auth howto >To: Dovecot mailing list <dovecot at procontrol.fi> >Message-ID: > <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306181319060.29812-100000 at shusaku.troll.no> >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > >On

Greetings, I recently rolled out Dovecot in our small (<30 people) company, and have been mightily impressed by the quality, performance and ease of use. I was hoping to use the new versions soon, as I'd like to start using CRAM-MD5 (much more common in mail clients than DIGEST-MD5), but found the 0.99.11 versions too unstable. So, I tried to build last nights CVS snapshot (May