similar to: Unable to Log in on FreeBSD server?

This one seems to be actually working. Also rewrote doc/index.txt in case someone is interested.

Hello, I''m trying to use the following Struct in my web app: UserInfo = Struct.new( "UserInfo", :first_name, :last_name, :email, :domain_name ) I placed this in the environment.rb, thinking that it should be initialized only once. But when I try to access it from within my controller, I get: undefined method `UserInfo'' for #<UserController:0x243ad5c>. so

I have a phone field in my table. But in my form i have two text boxes to get the phone number and the country code like below Enter country code ----- Enter phone code ------ In my table i have to save the phone code field after joining the above values with "-" symbol. Example => 0225-25874255 I dont have table field for country_code . So i created like below attr_accessor

Well, I read that back in 0.98 or so vpopmail support should work so I assumed it would be enabled in 0.99 but here's what I get. gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../src/lib -I/usr/local/vpopmail/include -g -O2 -Wall -W -g -O2 -Wall -W -c userinfo-vpopmail.c In file included from userinfo-vpopmail.c:12: /usr/local/vpopmail/include/vpopmail.h:133: syntax error before `*' ***

Oops, wrong address.. -------- Original Message -------- Message-ID: <3E0618CB.1060106 at is.a.fakepope.com> Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 11:55:55 -0800 From: Jesse Peterson <erage at is.a.fakepope.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020901 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dovecot Mail List <dovecot at procontrol.fi> Subject:

Hi All, I have 2 tables 1] user_infos & 2] users class UserInfo has_one :user validates_presence_of :city class User belongs_to :user_info validates_presence_of :first_name i write following code in my create method. @user_info = UserInfo.new(params[:user_info]) @user=@user_info.build_user(:first_name=>'''') if @user_info.save else end now what i want is to

Hi, Product "AccountsService" was disappeared. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi Only contact by gitlab ? Thanks, Akira Nakajima On 2018/11/20 16:19, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > On 11/19/18 10:50 PM, Nakajima Akira wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Mailing list of AccountsService does not found. >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/ >> >>

Okay. Are you saying that you shouldn't use __builtin functions in general in your program or just __builtin_setjmp/longjmp? Also, are there any warnings issued by either clang or llvm if they are used in your program? On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > The builtins are for internal compiler use in the context of SjLj exception >

The builtins are for internal compiler use in the context of SjLj exception handling. Any other use, including any direct calls of the builtins in user code, are a bad idea with no guaranteed behaviour. That they're exposed at all is, again, for historical purposes. Don't use them. -Jim On Apr 27, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Akira Hatanaka wrote: > Okay. I understand builtin functions do not

Hi Akira, Just two very minor things that I missed the first time around. 1. The 'fixup" member of ELFRelocation entry should be "Fixup" instead. 2. Since we're always passing in a non-NULL fixup, that should probably be a reference, not a pointer. Good for commit with those tweaks. Thanks! -Jim On Mar 23, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Akira Hatanaka wrote: > Hi Jim, >

Okay. I understand builtin functions do not have to behave exactly the same way as standard library functions. What I wanted to know is what should the code generated by llvm (clang + llc) look like (I am working on the Mips back-end now). I guess there should be a behavior users expect to see who are using __builtin_setjmp/longjmp even they aren't the same as library functions. If the code

On Mar 25, 2013, at 12:04 PM, Akira Hatanaka <ahatanak at gmail.com> wrote: > This patch adds parameter "EliminateFI" to RegScavenger::scavengeRegister, which tells register scavenger not to eliminate frame index of the emergency spill slot if set to false. > > I have pseudo load, store and copy instructions which are generated during register allocation and expanded

HI Akira, Please include the mailing list on replies. Using an MCExpr is the right way to build up things like symbol+offset. ARM has examples for that, as well, which may prove useful. For printing, the target libraries can do that however they want, including using the generic print method for expressions (or not). Often, the generic printing is sufficient, but not always. You can register a

There is no C standard to follow for these builtins. You are expecting them to behave as if they were the standard library calls. They are not equivalent and the naming similarity is an unfortunate historical artifact. Use the standard library functions instead. -Jim On Apr 27, 2011, at 1:22 PM, Akira Hatanaka wrote: > I declared gi2 as "volatile" and I think gi2 is still

Le 15/03/2012 03:07, Akira Hatanaka a écrit : > If you need llvm::Argument, this returns the iterator pointing to the > first argument: > > Function::const_arg_iterator Arg = > DAG.getMachineFunction().getFunction()->arg_begin(); Thanks Akira. Ivan > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Ivan Llopard<ivanllopard at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> How

Sorry, I meant to say, I added code to prevent llc from running machine verifier after delay slots are filled. MipsInstrInfo::AnalyzeBranch generates incorrect results after delay slots are filled. Also, it seems that code in MachineVerifier.cpp wasn't written with architectures that have delay slots in mind. On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Akira Hatanaka <ahatanak at gmail.com>

Hi, I have a form for creating users ... <% form_tag ''userconfirm'' do -%> <!-- more code --> <p><label for="user_login">Username</label><br/> <%= text_field ''user'', ''login'' %></p> <p><label for="user_password">Password</label><br/> <%=

Hi Jim, Thanks for reviewing the patch. I couldn't get rid of STLExtras.h, but other than that, I followed all the suggestions in your email. Please let me know if you notice anything else that needs fixing. On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Akira, > > This is looking good. Some specific comments on the details below. > >

I declared gi2 as "volatile" and I think gi2 is still incremented once. Here is a snippet of the code. Line 39 - 42 increments gi2. According to the standard, shouldn't ++gi2 be executed twice regardless of whether gi2 is volatile or not? Isn't the missing chain from EH_SJLJ_SETJMP node to load/store nodes that access gi2 causing this problem (please see attached file in my

Hi Duncan, No, it hasn't been reviewed yet. On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Akira, did anything happen with this patch? > > Ciao, Duncan. > > > On 09/05/13 04:04, Akira Hatanaka wrote: > >> The following code snippet taken from StackColoring::**remapInstructions >> clears a >> mem operand if it