similar to: Thread extension

On Sep 20, 11:50 am, wbrana@gmail.com wrote: > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 3:47 AM, Daniel J Blueman > > <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sep 19, 7:20 pm, wbr...@gmail.com wrote: > > >> RAID details: > >> > >> md8 : active raid10 sda7[0] sdd7[3] sdc7[2] sdb7[1] > >> 62925824 blocks 256K chunks 2 far-copies [4/4] [UUUU] >

Hi, can anyone help with this: I am trying to analyse some data in the form of proportions with the glm function in R and S-plus. When comparing different models with an F test, I get different results from R and S-plus. Here's an example (there are two factors and an interaction in the full model "glm1<-glm(resp~time*set,family=binomial"): In R, entering

> > If one compares the random effect estimates, in fact, one sees that > > they are in the correct proportion, with the expected signs. They are > > just approximately eight orders of magnitude too small. Is this a bug? > > BLUPs are essentially shrinkage estimates, where shrinkage is > determined with magnitude of variance. Lower variance more > shrinkage towards

Here is a small btrfs vs. ext4 benchmark with kernel 2.6.37-rc1. compilebench with options -i 10 -r 30 on 2.6.37-rc1 btrfs ========================================================================== intial create total runs 10 avg 73.11 MB/s (user 0.34s sys 1.96s) create total runs 5 avg 49.53 MB/s (user 0.41s sys 1.62s) patch total runs 4 avg 22.13 MB/s (user 0.09s sys 1.79s) compile total runs

Hi, I make a weibull survival regression using suvreg function. Bu when I try to get the P values from anova, it give me NAs: I'm using R 2.4.0 and survival 2.29 Look: m <- survreg(Surv(tempo,censor)~grupo*peso) anova(m) Df Deviance Resid. Df -2*LL P(>|Chi|) NULL NA NA 148 966.6416 NA grupo -2 25.6334407 146 941.0081 NA

Hi, I make a weibull survival regression using suvreg function. Bu when I try to get the P values from anova, it give me NAs: I'm using R version 2.4.0 Patched (2006-11-25 r39997) and survival 2.30 library Look: m <- survreg(Surv(tempo,censor)~grupo*peso) anova(m) Df Deviance Resid. Df -2*LL P(>|Chi|) NULL NA NA 148 966.6416 NA grupo

*The situation (or an example at least!)* example<-data.frame(rep(letters[1:10])) colnames(example)[1]<-("Letters") example$numb1<-rnorm(10,1,1) example$numb2<-rnorm(10,1,1) example$numb3<-rnorm(10,1,1)

This is an attempt to avoid potential confusion. Here are some example sizes for the two Syslinux versions mentioned in the e-mail subject. Your build results might be different. 4.06: 1 55 Sep 22 22:23 modules/int18.com 1 108 Nov 1 18:07 version.mk 1 138 Nov 1 18:07 version.gen 1 138 Nov 1 18:07 version.h 1 239 Sep 22 22:23 modules/poweroff.com 1 408 Sep 22 22:25

The test is manova. I tried to use manova() function, I used the code below:fit <- manova(Y ~ X)summary(fit, test="Wilks")but I get p values for intercept and regression coefficient as in anova() function, not for the hull model. Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 00:57:43 -0800 Subject: Re: [R] FW: multivariate regression From: djmuser@gmail.com To: denizsigirli@hotmail.com CC:

Hi Migration page [1] on wiki says "Courier version 3 (younger versions) Here everything has changed: Courier's UID data are now stored in courierpop3dsizelistand in a completely new format. But it's still possible to convert it to the format dovecot needs (link to perlscript and further configuration details will follow later). " but there's nothing more. I

Just thought to mention: http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/tmp/README.imapkeywords.html I'm not sure what to think of it. Good thing in it is that it doesn't limit the number of flags. Bad thing is that I think it's way too slow. Compared to Dovecot's implementation where I "steal" maildir flags a..z and treat them in the normal maildir way. Bad thing is obviously that

Hi, guys. I've read the information in the Wiki about making dovecot's UID's match Courier's UID's in the POP3 server, so that a UIDL command on either server will return the same UID's for the same group of messages. However, what I've read doesn't match what I'm seeing in Courier. Courier appears to keep the UID numbers for messages that it uses for the POP3

Have looked through all of the config options in the wiki and don't see a reference to turning off IDLE similar to courier's capability. Is it possible? Thanks for any pointers. Using version 1.1.6

Hi, I'm migrating from Courier-Imap to Dovecot-Imapd and I have some problems.. I don't want to change the IMAP folders, so I wish to have Dovecot's compatibility with Courier's IMAP folders. In the Dovecot configuration I configured this: namespace private { separator = . prefix = INBOX. inbox = yes } Dovecot correctly shows me the INBOX folder, but doesn't show me the

Dear All, Is it possible to make quota rules under $HOME/Maildir/* mailboxes with a specific command such as 'edquota' when the first email arrives at the $HOME/Maildir/{new,cur,tmp} of a user. In the below example, the <UserB> is the one who gets an email for the first time. edquota -p <UserA> <UserB> ---man edquot--- -p, --prototype=protoname Duplicate the

Hello folks, Any ideas how to do this? data.frame is a data frame with column names "x1",...,"xn" y is a response variable of length dim(data.frame)[1] I want to write a function function(y, data.frame){ lm(y~x1+...+xn) } This would be easy if n was always the same. If n is arbitrary how could I feed the x1+...+xn terms into lm(response~terms)? Thanks Richard -- Dr.

While running dovecot on debian etch using version 1.0.rc15-2etch3, i wonder the following: If i read the config files correctly, dovecot seems to have no equivalent of courier's IMAP_EMPTYTRASH=Trash:7 setting. Therefore, i wrote a script that dives into the user's directories and their maildirs. It looks like this: ============================================= #!/bin/bash for pad1

Started using dovecot and I am very impressed by its speed. I am confused by what it is expecting the format of the Maildir directory to be in. I currently have ~/Maildir which contains new, cur, and tmp all containing email that should be in my inbox and it pops up correctly as such when I connect to dovecot using Mutt. After the connection a new .INBOX is created under ~/Maildir with sym

>From: Charlie Brady <charlieb at e-smith.com> There's something wrong with manually accepting posts from non-subscribed addresses now, they're just left to queue directory for some reason.. Please try to keep the From-address the same as the subscribed one. > >From maildir-storage.c: > > ... > '.', /* hierarchy_sep - can't be changed */ >

I'm not sure if this is a bug or just an undesirable feature, but when I have our namespace configured to match Courier's "INBOX." functionality, Dovecot forces me to also define a default namespace (with no prefix). Without the default namespace defined I get "NO Unknown namespace." errors when trying to subscribe or unsubscribe folders. So I have configured my