Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Re: Bug#175507: dovecot: Accidental denial of service via syslog"
2003 Jan 08
1
Bug#175509: dovecot: init.d script should add some syslog statements on startup/shutdown (fwd)
[Amelia and Timo. As you are both on the dovecot list, I'm replying
there to avoid cluttering up your inboxes.]
This bug was reported to Debian but I feel it should be fixed upstream.
Adding logging in th init script itself would require adding additional
dependencies to the package and not be as convenient.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing at
2003 Mar 17
1
debian 0.99.8.1 packages available
I thought I'd mention it here because a lot of people have been waiting
for me on this. My personal situation is getting saner now so I finally
was able to package up 0.99.8.1. The package for sid was uploaded last
night and should appear in the archive today. A backport for woody is
available from http://www.braincells.com/open/
I have not included POP3, LDAP or SASL2 support for now as I
2005 Nov 06
2
1.0alpha4 uploaded to Debian unstable
I finally got some free time and uploaded 1.0alpha4. It will
arrive in the archive by tomorrow afternoon. Together with the
most recent libssl0.9.8 upgrade I think this will fix the SSL problems
users have been facing.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at debian.org>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
2002 Dec 18
1
0.99.4 uploaded to Debian
Hi,
I'm the Debian maintainer of UW-Imap. Like many I'm somewhat frustrated
with the limitations of it so I am very pleased to see that Dovecot is
becoming a strong alternative. I have uploaded packages of 0.99.4 to the
Debian unstable distribution (sid). Because this is a new package it has
to be added by hand so it may be a while before it shows up in sid. In
the mean time, I have
2004 Aug 09
3
Debian sarge release and dovecot
In what must surely be the first sign of the apocalypse, Debian is
actually freezing in preperation for a new release. Probably the last day
for uploads will be August 17. Is there likely to be another dovecot
release by then? In the event of 0.99.10.9 being the released version,
are there any other patches Debian users would like me to include?
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at
2003 Dec 02
1
Dovecot 0.99.10.4 for Debian
I've packaged 0.99.10.4. Owing to the continued downtime on the Debian
servers, I've temporarily put the .debs up on my own site. The URL is
http://www.braincells.com/debian/
A backport to woody is also available.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at debian.org>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
2004 Jul 06
1
Debian woody backport of 0.99.10.6 now available on backports.org
Well, the backports.org people finally installed my backport of the latest
stable version of dovecot. Please remove the Braincells apt source form
/etc/apt/sources.list and add these lines instead.
deb http://www.backports.org/debian stable dovecot openldap2 postgresql openssl
deb-src http://www.backports.org/debian stable dovecot
(If you are using other backports you can merge dovecot etc.
2004 Jul 30
2
Patch for 0.99.10.8
I uploaded 0.99.10.8 to Debian but I needed the patch below to get it to
compile.
--- dovecot-0.99.10.8.orig/src/auth/db-mysql.h
+++ dovecot-0.99.10.8/src/auth/db-mysql.h
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
#ifndef __DB_MYSQL_H
#define __DB_MYSQL_H
-#include <mysql.h>
+#include <mysql/mysql.h>
+#include <mysql/errmsg.h>
struct mysql_connection;
struct mysql_request;
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas
2003 Feb 03
1
About the dovecot package (fwd)
Dear Timo,
What do you think of this? Fyi, I've been getting the same thing lately
and I'm wondering if gnutls is to blame? (i've had inexlicable SIGSEGVs
in other apps before due to it.) Tomorrow I'll try with openssl but I was
wondering if you had any other ideas?
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at debian.org>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
2003 Mar 19
1
Dotlocking doesn't work?
A Debian developer had this to say:
> >> Files in the above dir are group mail, and the dir is group mail. However,
> > > all binaries in /usr/lib/dovecot are root/root. I have set them all to g+s,
> > > and group mail, and now the imap process can lock the INBOX.
> >
>
> > imap should be the only one that needs to be setgid mail.
>
> Actually,
2003 Dec 16
3
Re: Bug#224092: Dovecot IMAP: detection of folders
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Jeroen van Disseldorp wrote:
> Package: dovecot-imapd
> Version: 0.99.10.4-2
> Severity: normal
>
> When accessing a maildir with "all folders" instead of "only subscribed
> folders", dovecot wrongfully reports its index-files (.imap.*) as mail
> folders. When the client (KMail 1.5.2 in my case) checks for email, it
> aborts halfway
2003 Oct 02
2
Patches
As the freeze for Debian sarge slowly approaches I want to make sure
the Dovecot packages are in as good condition as possible. I see there
have been a number of patches since 0.99.10. I have added the following
patches:
* segfault when user home directory is empty
* Proper PAM service name
* Make suid work on 2.6 kernels
Any other patches thatI ought to add. Or better yet, will there be a
2004 Dec 13
1
latest debs
Just wondering: Has anyone, or is anyone planning to, build debs for
0.99.12? Jaldhar Vyas, are you still around and doing such things?
Paul
2004 Jun 20
1
Debian dovecot news
I uploaded 0.99.10.6 to sid. Owing to the importance of the dot lock fix,
I've tried to have this pushed to sarge quickly. Let's see how that goes.
I've prepared a backport of 0.99.10.6 to woody which should be showing up
on www.backports.org soon hopefully. In the meantime, if you desperately
need it and don't mind working out dependencies yourself, you can find it
at
2005 Jul 22
1
Re: Bug#319504: Bug in 0.99.14 mbox handling - mail UIDs are renumbered without bumping UIDVALIDITY
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, David McBride wrote:
> Package: dovecot-imapd
> Version: 0.99.14-1
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> I think I've identified a bug in Dovecot 0.99.14 as packaged and
> distributed by Debian Sarge. I believe the bug lies in the original
> Dovecot source, not with any modifications made by Debian.
>
> Specifically, this bug deals with
2003 Sep 05
1
Debian bug #201444: More verbose logging
I brought this up a while ago but the submitter is wondering if there
has been any progress on this issue. He says:
It would be extremely nice to have a little bit more detailed logging,
and I believe it doesn't really require that much code.
I use now a daemon which logs login (name, ip; as dovecot does), and
logout (with name, logout reason if any special) with the numbers of
2003 Jan 03
2
maildirmake, shared folders
Does dovecot support shared folders, maildir style?
I've set it up, using the maildirmake from debian maildrop to create folders. I have a number of as-yet unresolved issues, so I haven't been able to test with many clients. It's interesting that dovecot manages to present folders as siblings (rather than children) of INBOX. But mutt, at least, doesn't seem to see the shared
2005 Dec 14
2
Panic: file mail-index-sync-ext.c: line 155 (get_ext_header): assertion failed
One of the mbox files on my server causes dovecot to assert. I've caught
the assert in gdb and have attached the backtrace. Unfortunatly my
binary isn't built with debugging symbols, so I'm not sure how helpful
it will be.
smtp:/var$ uname -a
Linux smtp 2.6.14-2-686-smp #1 SMP Sat Nov 26 13:37:07 UTC 2005 i686
GNU/Linux
smtp:/var$ cat /etc/debian_version
3.1
smtp:/var$ dpkg -p
2005 Aug 10
0
Re: dovecot 0.99.20050712-1
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, Nick Maynard wrote:
> Yep - I too saw that posting on the dovecot list... sadly after I posted
> to this one. I thought the best thing to do was probably to wait
> quietly, but I suppose giving him a friendly poke can't do any harm
> (Hello, Jaldhar!).
>
> Thanks all,
>
Apologies for the delay but I have now prepared a backport. The problem
is
2003 Jan 08
0
Bug reports from Debian BTS
Timo,
Are you (or any other interested list readers for that matter) interested
in directly receiving bug reports about dovecot sent to Debian? If you
are, you can go to http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dovecot.html and sign
up to have notifications sent to you or the list or wherever.
Or I can screen them and only send you ones I think are relevant as I'm
doing now.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas