similar to: Assert in imap-bodystructure.c

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1100 matches similar to: "Assert in imap-bodystructure.c"

2002 Dec 27
1
o.99rc2 works on PowerPC - sort of...
Hi all, The new release starts on PowerPC now. On to the next problem... :-) When accessing my folders through Pine (setup to always go through IMAP, even local mboxes) I get "kicked out" it seems, pretty often. Here's what shows in the logfile: imap(jonas): file imap-bodystructure.c: line 342 (part_write_body): assertion failed: (part->children->next == NULL) - Jonas --
2017 May 02
2
Issue with parsing of forwarded messages with attachments and quotes in the subject
Hi all, at work we use Roundcube acting as a mail client for the Dovecot Imap server. In Roundube the messages are parsed through the Imap BODYSTRUCTURE command If a message contains forwarded messages and attachments and some of the messages contains a quote (") in the subject, then the resulting BODYSTRUCTURE appears to be malformed. --- After some digging through the code of
2004 Oct 01
1
Dovecot/IMP Bug with RFC822.SIZE and BODYSTRUCTURE
Ok, I have narrowed my IMP/Dovecot attachment problem down to what I think is a bug in Dovecot. The test that follow are performed on 0.99.11. When you download an attachment in IMP it uses the php function imap_fetchbody() which contacts the IMAP server and retrieves just the mime chunk you are looking for. It does this by first fetching some information about the email, and then grabs the
2003 Jan 06
1
0.99.6rc1 released
Again rc, just in case I broke something. Or maybe I should just start creating nightly CVS snapshots. Anyway, fixes the few bugs people have reported lately: - Mails with nested MIME parts might have caused incorrect BODY and BODYSTRUCTURE fetches and sometimes might have crashed dovecot (assert at imap-bodystructure.c). If client had already successfully done the BODY fetching a
2020 Mar 03
3
[PATCH] lib-imap: imap-bodystructure: add test with empty header field
This causes the body structure to be incorrect. The RFC says it's fine o have empty header field values. --- This just adds a failing test, inspired from an e-mail spotted in the wild. Ideas welcome to fix it. src/lib-imap/test-imap-bodystructure.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/lib-imap/test-imap-bodystructure.c
2017 Dec 08
3
Mailsploit problem in responce of BODYSTRUCTURE
Hi, I tried to see a mail that have a strange From header in bellow URL: https://www.mailsploit.com/index Then, I got BODYSTRUCTURE response contain next: ((NIL NIL "service" "paypal.com")) Are this problem already founded by anyone? So already fixed? -- TACHIBANA Masashi QUALITIA CO., LTD. mailto:tachibana at qualitia.co.jp
2018 Nov 15
1
FETCH BODY vs FETCH BODYSTRUCTURE + FETCH BODY.PEEK
Hello, we are developing a web page, for a ticket system, to show the email messages ordered by the biggest attachments size present in an IMAP folder, with a pagination of 100 messages per page. Each raw represents a message with "DATE, FROM, SUBJECT, the preview (the first 500 chars of the text/html of the messsage) and the list of the attachments (name + size) it contains. The
2005 Feb 02
1
assertion failed in imap-bodystructure.c
Hello, I'm currently testing dovecot/imap (Version 0.99.13). I found this in the log: imap(xxxxx): [ID 265587 mail.crit] file imap-bodystructure.c: line 278 (part_parse_headers): assertion failed: (part->physical_pos >= input->v_offset - start_offset) dovecot: [ID 684838 mail.error] child 7376 (imap) killed with signal 6 The user tried to setup a new folder (with Thunderbird)
2012 May 10
1
BODYSTRUCTURE bug?
Hi! I've found a bug in Content-Type parsing. It's old instance of dovecot 1.1. Maybe fixed in newer versions. I have a mail with header: Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="------------080705010808010608030700"; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature";micalg="SHA1" and it works, but when the boundary is in different order Content-Type:
2007 Oct 17
1
Problem with bodystructure/partial fetch using 1.1*
Hi there I'm using dovecot-1.1b2/b3 with deliver. All information is stored in an SQL database and no errors related to this issue are written to the logs (actually I get no errors at all). I've run into at problem; FETCH BODYSTRUCTURE is broken after upgrading to dovecot 1.1b2 (same issue with 1.1b3). BODUSTRUCTURE only returns information from the first section (with incorrect
2006 Dec 22
2
imap failed asssert in imap-bodystructure.c
I'm running Dovecot on a Debian system which recently has been failing on an assert(). I have a spam mailbox that if I try and open (from any client), the imap process dies and this is written to the error logs: Dec 21 18:57:11 theronge imap(mronge): file imap-bodystructure.c: line 278 (part_parse_headers): assertion failed: (part->physical_pos >= input->v_offset -
2007 Mar 15
5
[PATCH 0/5] fix gcc warnings in CVS HEAD
Hi, I have rewritten the patches I submitted earlier today for the CVS HEAD. Some of the changes were already committed months ago. On 2007/03/15 12:30, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > That's ok, but I'm not sure about bsearch_insert_pos(). It's the way it > is mostly because I wanted to keep bsearch() API. If it can't return > void * then maybe it could be
2009 May 04
2
Problem with BODYSTRUCTURE (wrong charset)
Hi, I've changed a program that fetches mail via IMAP from an Exchange Server to use our Dovecot machine. But now I'm experiencing strange problems with seem to be caused by a wrong BODYSTRUCTURE answer that causes wrong charset handling. When fetchting the BODYSTRUCTURE I see this: Dovecot: 88 UID fetch 32 (BODYSTRUCTURE) * 1 FETCH (UID 32 BODYSTRUCTURE ("text"
2016 Aug 22
1
RFC 3501 violation in FETCH BODY responses
Hi there, Quoting RFC 3501 sec. 7.4.2 ?FETCH Response? (data item BODYSTRUCTURE): ?A body type of type MESSAGE and subtype RFC822 contains, immediately after the basic fields, the envelope structure, body structure, and size in text lines of the encapsulated message.? According the ABNF (RFC 3501 sec. 9) the envelope structure is that of the ENVELOPE FETCH data item, and the
2009 Nov 12
2
fetch bodystructure filename problem rfc2231
Hi, I have a problem with the filename of attachments in some clients. # dovecot 1.2.(5|7) * 3 FETCH (BODYSTRUCTURE (("text" "plain" ("charset" "us-ascii") NIL NIL "7bit" 13 1 NIL NIL NIL NIL)("text" "plain" ("charset" "UTF-8" "name" "ISO-8859-1''testanh%E4ng.txt") NIL NIL
2021 Jun 21
2
Dovecot v2.3.14.1 released
Hi, This is an "important fixes only" release in case you don't want to upgrade to v2.3.15. There is no matching Pigeonhole release - use the same v2.3.14 instead. https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.14.1.tar.gz <https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.14.1.tar.gz> https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.14.1.tar.gz.sig
2021 Jun 21
2
Dovecot v2.3.14.1 released
Hi, This is an "important fixes only" release in case you don't want to upgrade to v2.3.15. There is no matching Pigeonhole release - use the same v2.3.14 instead. https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.14.1.tar.gz <https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.14.1.tar.gz> https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.14.1.tar.gz.sig
2015 Sep 08
1
Fetch command response questions
Hello, I have the following issue: When using command? FETCH 2 (BODY.PEEK[HEADER] UID INTERNALDATE FLAGS BODYSTRUCTURE) on 2 different emails, we get 2 different response structure. First response structure contains the BODYSTRUCTURE in a single line, while in the second response, the BODYSTRUCTURE is divided into multiple lines with "{61}" character at the end of each line.
2009 Nov 10
1
[Fwd: Re: Bug in BODYSTRUCTURE]
Fyi... Sam Varshavik (courier-imap developer) claims (on the courier-imap list, see attached) dovecot is incorrectly parsing messages with missing/invalid "MIME-Version:" header... I have no clue if he is correct... if so, maybe this has already been fixed? -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Sam Varshavchik <mrsam at courier-mta.com>
2017 Dec 08
0
Mailsploit problem in responce of BODYSTRUCTURE
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 18:47:37 +0900, TACHIBANA Masashi wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to see a mail that have a strange From header in bellow URL: > > https://www.mailsploit.com/index > > Then, I got BODYSTRUCTURE response contain next: > > ((NIL NIL "service" "paypal.com")) > > Are this problem already founded by anyone? > So already