similar to: CEBA-2011:0815 CentOS 5 i386 busybox FASTTRACK Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0815 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0815.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: b9e114cf2ee8faa6b61807170c49720e busybox-1.2.0-9.el5.x86_64.rpm 62c881a1bae28333e19dbffa2a4fed45 busybox-anaconda-1.2.0-9.el5.x86_64.rpm Source:

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0815 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0815.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 54a81e3f18521316144e0d2b67729b9d busybox-1.2.0-10.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm 6fca513b911c5fdfe4d5a2fafe1b4290 busybox-anaconda-1.2.0-10.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0815 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0815.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 3715f213e1cd45237763100d0066dbe2 busybox-1.2.0-10.el5.centos.i386.rpm e938723e6727624a735fbeefbcb6b2b9 busybox-anaconda-1.2.0-10.el5.centos.i386.rpm Source:

Hi All, does anyone here know where to get the source rpms for these two packages? anaconda-runtime-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos busybox-anaconda-1.2.0-4.el5.centos I have found the anaconda-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos on ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS but not the others, is there a reason for this? regards Chad Pinnacle Technology Holdings E-Mail Disclaimer:

Hi, I am trying to build busybox for the centos-5.3,but facing issues in installing the busybox executable into the centos filesystem. Is it possible to build a busybox for a server platform (x86) with centos. Thanks and Regards, Premraj Disclaimer : This message is proprietary to Smartlink Network Systems Limited and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is

All the files in /bin are links to busybox. guestfs_file_architecture doesn't follow symlinks so it fails. Therefore check /bin/busybox (not a symlink) to find the architecture. --- src/inspect-fs-unix.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/inspect-fs-unix.c b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c index f915e86..6aaf5a1 100644 --- a/src/inspect-fs-unix.c +++

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0026 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0026.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: dca4151ada0126d7a2995cd930f674ff58303c19a70d6644c1f07eaee3e16a08 busybox-1.2.0-10.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm

Hello what is the difference between busybox and klibc? Say, I want to use an initramfs in order to mount root over nfs, I can choose to use klibc with ipconfig and nfsmount? But I can also choose to use busybox with ifconfig and mount. So what's the difference, and why and in which case one is preferable to the other? If it's a FAQ, I'm sorry, just give me the link Thanks

When I say busybox it''s actually VMware ESX server which seems to use busybox (which I guess is the case a number of other software appliances) . Reason for wanting to install puppet is to run the cli tools to create nightly vmware snapshots. I''m happy to give it a go (and add the docs to the wiki) but I''m not too sure at this stage how big a task this might be and what,

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0810 Low Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0810.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: a0d9ecd33900791bf3c5395ebe3e80fabacddb28d41fc967955e2aa6eb1b22c4 busybox-1.15.1-15.el6.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1165 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1165.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 5cd60c4b0f49064e475e7600805b0b013ef08fc0037941b2bcc2d2fe76c36e59 busybox-1.15.1-16.el6_4.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0244 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0244.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 8a65b7fef64f6cf48889b896f6a47c0ed4503b0ec7aeed2b2515972ededcd1b7 busybox-1.15.1-21.el6_6.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0244 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0244.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/busybox-1.00.rc1-7.el4.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/busybox-anaconda-1.00.rc1-7.el4.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/busybox-1.00.rc1-7.el4.s390x.rpm

I applied your patch, but no success. What bothers me is that connection gets reseted. By the way, i'm using systemd, with process started in forking mode and as daemon. Could this cause any problems? This is my libvirtd.conf, if it helps anything: unix_sock_group = "libvirtd" unix_sock_rw_perms = "0770" auth_unix_ro = "none" auth_unix_rw = "none" Can

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2478 Bug ID: 2478 Summary: Escape sequences (starting with ~) don't work when remote shell is BusyBox ash Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: ix86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5

Hello! Okay i tried again with only staticly linked busybox: offlinehacker:~/ $ /home/offlinehacker/busybox/busybox BusyBox v1.17.1 (Debian 1:1.17.1-8) multi-call binary. Copyright (C) 1998-2009 Erik Andersen, Rob Landley, Denys Vlasenko and others. Licensed under GPLv2. See source distribution for full notice. .... Again my id: uid=499(offlinehacker) gid=100(users)

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0244 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0244.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/busybox-1.00.rc1-7.el4.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/busybox-anaconda-1.00.rc1-7.el4.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi at iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored

On Tuesday 26 January 2016 15:54:46 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > All the files in /bin are links to busybox. guestfs_file_architecture > doesn't follow symlinks so it fails. Therefore check /bin/busybox > (not a symlink) to find the architecture. > --- While this patch looks okay in principle, I think it would be better to just resolve the paths we are looking for: that is, do

On 3/21/23 18:28, Eric Blake wrote: > it is indeed a bug in busybox now that POSIX is moving towards > standardizing realpath, so I've filed it: > https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15466 I've found another busybox bug. The "/bin/sh" utility is provided by busybox as well (via the usual symlinking). Per POSIX, if execvp(file, { argv[0], argv[1], ..., NULL })