similar to: CEEA-2011:0442 CentOS 5 i386 lapack FASTTRACK Update

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:0442 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0442.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 0d648aea8bd62d0c20b72a534065b3b4 blas-3.0-38.el5.i386.rpm 06beed7a72fdadb8e325986f621af57c blas-3.0-38.el5.x86_64.rpm 7a640389990000ad4859731beca83959

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0442 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0442.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 9c249b3e82dfd6a71085d07b81ee5e9a blas-3.0-38.el5.i386.rpm aad852f9c407aa96b6090eda428878c1 blas-devel-3.0-38.el5.i386.rpm c03685ef75f4a24530e8b657e13e6d26

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0442 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0442.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: bfc9a587b79fc30e361a7c2ef746f3de blas-3.0-38.el5.i386.rpm 5073e395fcde830658e424fbb51c36b7 blas-3.0-38.el5.x86_64.rpm 5ecae0e616c6fc63827f9afc5d392405

On 5/6/19 12:57 PM, Janne Blomqvist wrote: > On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 11:55 AM Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 5/4/19 6:49 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: >>> On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 06:42:47PM +0200, Thomas K?nig wrote: >>>>> - figure out Fortran2003 specification for C/Fortran interoperability >>>>> -- this _sounds_ like the

On 5/4/19 6:49 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 06:42:47PM +0200, Thomas K?nig wrote: >>> - figure out Fortran2003 specification for C/Fortran interoperability >>> -- this _sounds_ like the right solution, but I don't think many >>> understand how to use it and what is implied (in particular, will >>> it require making changes to LAPACK

Dear developeRs, I'm trying to build R (2.7.1, on an x86_64 running Linux, but I believe I have observed this on x86 and with earlier versions of R as well) using external BLAS and LAPACK libraries _and_ generating libR.so, libRblas.so and libRlapack.so. Without --enable-BLAS-shlib, configure is able to find and use the external LAPACK library: ./configure \

On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 11:55 AM Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 5/4/19 6:49 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 06:42:47PM +0200, Thomas K?nig wrote: > >>> - figure out Fortran2003 specification for C/Fortran interoperability > >>> -- this _sounds_ like the right solution, but I don't think many >

Hi, I am working on a UNIX machine and I am interfacing R and C with the .C function. I am trying to call LAPACK and BLAS routines, but am running into a problem where, while I am able to run the BLAS routines, I cannot run the LAPACK routines. I compile my .c file (at end of email) in the following way: [mhitczen at jlogin2 ~/Cstuff]$ R CMD SHLIB testmore.c gcc -std=gnu99

A couple of years ago I noted that using the configure switch --enable-R-shlib when buildig R made configure ignore any specified external LAPACK library (I cannot recall if also the BLAS specification was ignored) and use the internal one insted. I asked why, and was told it was intentional. Now, with R 2.15.1, I see that it at least appears that this is no longer the case. I've run

Dear Thomas, thank you for your input. I've debugged one of the packages and I confirm that the breakage is related to passing of strings from C to Fortran. Indeed, BLAS and LAPACK define a large number of subroutines that take one or more explicit single-character strings as arguments. Other than that, BLAS has only one function (xerbla), which takes a string of unspecified length,

Well, I've now tried just about every permutation I can think of - including using the ATLAS lapack (instead of generic), in various combinations with ACML, or generic BLAS, or ATLAS blas. No matter what I do, so long as I have lapack of any flavour, I get the 'stats error' with make check. And, it always seems to throw the error at the same point in the stats test file (an svd in

A couple of years ago (in 2008, using R 2.7.x, I believe) I noted that using the configure switch --enable-R-shlib when buildig R made configure ignore any specified external LAPACK library and use the internal one insted. I asked why, and was told it was intentional. Now, with R 2.15.1, I see that it at least appears that this is no longer the case. I've run configure like this:

Dear All, I am building R from source[1], following what is done in "rules" for building Debian's R. But the R I generate, in contrast to the standard Debian's R, will not change the BLAS and LAPACK libraries it uses when I change them via "update-alternatives". I have no idea what I am doing wrong (but, somehow, I've been quite capable of making the same

Hi, I'm relatively new to R on Ubuntu (moving from Windows), and I'm trying to get GotoBLAS2 working. I installed (from a CRAN mirror) the pre-built binaries of R (which, as far as I know, is compiled as a shared library) on Ubuntu 10.10 using apt-get install r-base r-base-dev I successfully built GotoBLAS2 from source, copied the library to /usr/lib and created s symbolic link from

OS X 10.2 and higher comes standard with highly optimized versions of BLAS and Lapack in /Systems/Library/Frameworks/vecLib.framework. It seems that even for double precision they do much better. See http://sthmac.magnet.fsu.edu/benchmarks/ I am not sure how these numbers would look on G3 Macs, but obviously for double precision there is not much reliance on Altivec. So I tried to configure

Hello, I just had a lot of trouble compiling a version of R which uses a recently-compiled version of ATLAS and LAPACK. ATLAS and LAPACK compiled correctly and installed fine and passed all of their checks (and yes, I did compile them all with -fPIC as is required for R). This was my initial configure line: ./configure --with-x --enable-threads=posix --with-blas="-L/usr/local/lib

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:0443 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0443.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: c54a8e2a9b4f2fc521d5d6c289366d4c exim-4.63-10.el5.i386.rpm 5e1012715ee15bd5e2a63daec56717ea exim-mon-4.63-10.el5.i386.rpm 2c1c675ad2128da3e584207f6fc693f2

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:0441 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0441.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 5eb261f9ea6a5b92930ddcd814ea4222 gnome-vfs2-2.16.2-8.el5.i386.rpm ca673c1fa526e119d9f06c612a24d084 gnome-vfs2-devel-2.16.2-8.el5.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:0440 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0440.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 765879b69caa9970fbb77a2db89144a6 nautilus-2.16.2-10.el5.i386.rpm bf323c95cac60af680f55097fc6b248c nautilus-devel-2.16.2-10.el5.i386.rpm