similar to: CEEA-2011:0442 CentOS 5 i386 lapack FASTTRACK Update

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:0442 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0442.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 0d648aea8bd62d0c20b72a534065b3b4 blas-3.0-38.el5.i386.rpm 06beed7a72fdadb8e325986f621af57c blas-3.0-38.el5.x86_64.rpm 7a640389990000ad4859731beca83959

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0442 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0442.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 9c249b3e82dfd6a71085d07b81ee5e9a blas-3.0-38.el5.i386.rpm aad852f9c407aa96b6090eda428878c1 blas-devel-3.0-38.el5.i386.rpm c03685ef75f4a24530e8b657e13e6d26

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0442 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0442.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: bfc9a587b79fc30e361a7c2ef746f3de blas-3.0-38.el5.i386.rpm 5073e395fcde830658e424fbb51c36b7 blas-3.0-38.el5.x86_64.rpm 5ecae0e616c6fc63827f9afc5d392405

On 5/6/19 12:57 PM, Janne Blomqvist wrote: > On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 11:55 AM Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 5/4/19 6:49 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: >>> On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 06:42:47PM +0200, Thomas K?nig wrote: >>>>> - figure out Fortran2003 specification for C/Fortran interoperability >>>>> -- this _sounds_ like the

On 5/4/19 6:49 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 06:42:47PM +0200, Thomas K?nig wrote: >>> - figure out Fortran2003 specification for C/Fortran interoperability >>> -- this _sounds_ like the right solution, but I don't think many >>> understand how to use it and what is implied (in particular, will >>> it require making changes to LAPACK

Executive summary: I believe revision 86265 makes it more difficult to build R with OpenBLAS on Windows as now the entire LAPACK needs to be built to obtain zspmv. Is there anything that can be done to allow the former behavior to be used, something in Mkrules.local perhaps? Detailed Explanation: I have been building R with OpenBLAS for Windows 64 for over a decade by patching

Dear developeRs, I'm trying to build R (2.7.1, on an x86_64 running Linux, but I believe I have observed this on x86 and with earlier versions of R as well) using external BLAS and LAPACK libraries _and_ generating libR.so, libRblas.so and libRlapack.so. Without --enable-BLAS-shlib, configure is able to find and use the external LAPACK library: ./configure \

On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 11:55 AM Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 5/4/19 6:49 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 06:42:47PM +0200, Thomas K?nig wrote: > >>> - figure out Fortran2003 specification for C/Fortran interoperability > >>> -- this _sounds_ like the right solution, but I don't think many >

Hi, I am working on a UNIX machine and I am interfacing R and C with the .C function. I am trying to call LAPACK and BLAS routines, but am running into a problem where, while I am able to run the BLAS routines, I cannot run the LAPACK routines. I compile my .c file (at end of email) in the following way: [mhitczen at jlogin2 ~/Cstuff]$ R CMD SHLIB testmore.c gcc -std=gnu99

A couple of years ago I noted that using the configure switch --enable-R-shlib when buildig R made configure ignore any specified external LAPACK library (I cannot recall if also the BLAS specification was ignored) and use the internal one insted. I asked why, and was told it was intentional. Now, with R 2.15.1, I see that it at least appears that this is no longer the case. I've run

Dear Thomas, thank you for your input. I've debugged one of the packages and I confirm that the breakage is related to passing of strings from C to Fortran. Indeed, BLAS and LAPACK define a large number of subroutines that take one or more explicit single-character strings as arguments. Other than that, BLAS has only one function (xerbla), which takes a string of unspecified length,

Well, I've now tried just about every permutation I can think of - including using the ATLAS lapack (instead of generic), in various combinations with ACML, or generic BLAS, or ATLAS blas. No matter what I do, so long as I have lapack of any flavour, I get the 'stats error' with make check. And, it always seems to throw the error at the same point in the stats test file (an svd in

A couple of years ago (in 2008, using R 2.7.x, I believe) I noted that using the configure switch --enable-R-shlib when buildig R made configure ignore any specified external LAPACK library and use the internal one insted. I asked why, and was told it was intentional. Now, with R 2.15.1, I see that it at least appears that this is no longer the case. I've run configure like this:

Dear All, I am building R from source[1], following what is done in "rules" for building Debian's R. But the R I generate, in contrast to the standard Debian's R, will not change the BLAS and LAPACK libraries it uses when I change them via "update-alternatives". I have no idea what I am doing wrong (but, somehow, I've been quite capable of making the same

Hi, I'm relatively new to R on Ubuntu (moving from Windows), and I'm trying to get GotoBLAS2 working. I installed (from a CRAN mirror) the pre-built binaries of R (which, as far as I know, is compiled as a shared library) on Ubuntu 10.10 using apt-get install r-base r-base-dev I successfully built GotoBLAS2 from source, copied the library to /usr/lib and created s symbolic link from

OS X 10.2 and higher comes standard with highly optimized versions of BLAS and Lapack in /Systems/Library/Frameworks/vecLib.framework. It seems that even for double precision they do much better. See http://sthmac.magnet.fsu.edu/benchmarks/ I am not sure how these numbers would look on G3 Macs, but obviously for double precision there is not much reliance on Altivec. So I tried to configure

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:0443 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0443.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: c54a8e2a9b4f2fc521d5d6c289366d4c exim-4.63-10.el5.i386.rpm 5e1012715ee15bd5e2a63daec56717ea exim-mon-4.63-10.el5.i386.rpm 2c1c675ad2128da3e584207f6fc693f2

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:0441 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0441.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 5eb261f9ea6a5b92930ddcd814ea4222 gnome-vfs2-2.16.2-8.el5.i386.rpm ca673c1fa526e119d9f06c612a24d084 gnome-vfs2-devel-2.16.2-8.el5.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:0440 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0440.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 765879b69caa9970fbb77a2db89144a6 nautilus-2.16.2-10.el5.i386.rpm bf323c95cac60af680f55097fc6b248c nautilus-devel-2.16.2-10.el5.i386.rpm