similar to: [OT] RedHat's licence, CentOS rebuild

The "2005 Readers' Choice Awards" voting is in progress at Linux Journal, and CentOS is Nominated in the "distribution:" category. So ... all you guys and gals who think CentOS is the best thing ever, get over to: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8266 and vote for CentOS :) ------------------------------- Also, since write ins are allowed on the e-mailed ballot, if

Hello, Does anyone have instructions on how to go through the entire process from downloading source RPM's from RedHat's servers through to building the entire distribution? I've searched through the web and CentOS' own web sites and couldn't find such instructions. Is it just a matter of downloading them from

Hello, This afternoon I received the new that my institution, in the main direction, is planning (for political reasons, I don't know which one??) migrate to Debian. I have a hotted conversation with my boss cause I've been working on CentOS during near a year and half. I explained it that both distros just implement the protocols that are standards, that could be installed a web server

http://www.businessinsider.com/red-hat-ceo-go-ahead-copy-our-software-2013-8 Title says is all. Nice to know RH understands and accepts the relationship between CentOS and RHEL. Although it is complex. After all, if too many choose CentOS, there may no longer be a CentOS. However, I don't think I would refer to CentOS as a "parasite" as the author Matt Asay does. More appropriate

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > Can you get the product without being bound by the restrictions? > That is, can one user purchase one and resell copies without the SLA > or with their own? Not with the trademark, that is mis-appropriation. If you want to complain about Red Hat doing this, then you'll want to complain about a number of distributors well before

Hey folks, Could we have a talk about the website homepage layout? Here is a tentative sketch I am working on for the a new website theme: https://centos.gitlab.io/artwork/centos-web/jekyll-theme-centos-base/documentation/#the-page-basehome-layout In this layout: Are "News and Events" and "Blog Posts" redundant sections?? Does it make sense to present only extracts from

Hi, I would send an introductory e-mail to: R-foundation at R-project.org <mailto:R-foundation at R-project.org> That will facilitate further discussion on the matter and additional details can be requested offline as may be needed. Be aware that none of the R Foundation members are lawyers. So while we can perhaps offer informal and non-binding opinions, you should seek formal legal

> On Dec 9, 2014, at 10:44 AM, Henrik Bengtsson <hb at biostat.ucsf.edu> wrote: > > On Dec 9, 2014 6:38 AM, "Apps Embedded" <apps.embedded at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> We have published an Android app called R Console on the Play Store since >> D?cember 2013. >>

> On Dec 9, 2014, at 3:34 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 09/12/2014, 4:26 PM, Marc Schwartz wrote: >> >>> On Dec 9, 2014, at 10:44 AM, Henrik Bengtsson <hb at biostat.ucsf.edu> wrote: >>> >>> On Dec 9, 2014 6:38 AM, "Apps Embedded" <apps.embedded at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>

Does anyone have concern about this? What if Redhat stops giving SRPMS for new releases and updates in public? If you buy a subscription to RHEL AS and they have to give you the SRPMS because of GPL agreement can that person provide those SRPMS to public again because of GPL? They claim they are premium OpenSource company but they are still a company and for them money is bottom line.

There is a new Web Application Stack that I would like to get the RPMS for into CentOS Plus. I am trying to get the upstream provider to the provide these SRPMS to their public FTP server, but so far they are not there: https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-October/msg00053.html These RPMS would be a major add to CentOSPlus .... as they would provide an enterprise web stack with

There is a new Web Application Stack that I would like to get the RPMS for into CentOS Plus. I am trying to get the upstream provider to the provide these SRPMS to their public FTP server, but so far they are not there: https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-October/msg00053.html These RPMS would be a major add to CentOSPlus .... as they would provide an enterprise web stack with

Dear list, For the maintainer of a given package, is it possible to change the licence of a it from GPL >= 2 to GPL >= 3 ? Thanks in advance, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini, Ph.D -- ================================================= Water Resources Unit Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES) Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission TP 261, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027

HI All, I have written and succesfully uploaded a new package. The licence it is under is 'GPL' --no version. My assumption is, since all the code is written in R the licence R used for R would affect the code (hence my "GPL" stands for "whatever version of the GPL R is under") I am happy with the licencing I used, but I'd like to ask if there is any transitive

I plan to highlight the differences between RHEL and CentOS 3.1. Making this information clearly available without the need for duplicated effort across the world. This will help others take CentOS in different directions benefiting us all. It will help individuals create new projects more easily and efficiently. Are the diff files readily available, can I download them from anywhere? If the

Hi, If I develope an dialplan, some AGI and AMI functions for Asterisk and ship it as an complete product to an coustomer, do I have to put my developed code or the complete product under the GPL? best regards Thomas

Hi, is it possible to use some statistic computing by R in proprietary software? Our software is written in c#, and we intend to use http://rdotnet.codeplex.com/ to get R work there. Especially we want to use loess function. Thanks, Best regards, Stanislav [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi All!I am builiding a firewall appliance based on CentOS. I am using CentOS as it is with some packages removed and some configuration done to security harden the appliance. Over and above this I will be installing Apache Web Server and Tomcat to run my web application which will give a web interface to configure the iptables in the appliance. There is no development done in iptables. It is used

hi, I wonder if anyone can tell me how the Nicecast licensing works. http://www.rogueamoeba.com/nicecast/ Nicecast, as it seems to me, uses Icecast as an internal server. They list Icecast in their sources dir: http://www.rogueamoeba.com/sources In their manual they also credit Xiph with the statement: "Portions of this Rogue Amoeba software may utilize the following copyrighted material,

i can't find licence information for the following files: http://hostopia.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba3-HOWTO.pdf http://hostopia.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba3-ByExample.pdf As you see, they are two basic samba information sources, and I need to know if I can just print it and leave in computer lab for all who wish to avoid reading it from monitor. It is about 1300 pages total, so I need to make