similar to: CESA-2010:0501 Critical CentOS 5 i386 firefox Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0501 Critical Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0501.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: bab28041772519e0f54d839b8337e09b devhelp-0.12-20.el5.i386.rpm 4bf8e642480df70c3c04d592646071ff devhelp-0.12-20.el5.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0215 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0215.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: a0331baccf4c050d90b3d3aa0021ef0e totem-2.16.7-7.el5_6.1.i386.rpm d99219e28498ce534d39a4a427cbc032 totem-2.16.7-7.el5_6.1.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0215 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0215.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 84527388ef6fd055993f2fd378aca35a totem-2.16.7-7.el5_6.1.i386.rpm d6da725bd64c0b750d825a880794fc2a totem-devel-2.16.7-7.el5_6.1.i386.rpm

CentOS-5.1 Is there anything special one must do to get the Totem shipped with CentOS-5 to display .mov files? When I try to view a file I get an error box with the message: Totem could not play 'file:///tmp/073_complex_forms_part_1.mov'. Could not decode stream." # rpm -qi totem Name : totem Relocations: (not relocatable) Version :

it's strange since this kernel don't have kvm support, qemu or qemu-kvm or kvm package is not added. even though it was said that 5.4 will support kvm?:-( Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > New Packages in RHEL 5.4 Beta: > ******************************** > blktrace-1.0.0-6.el5.src.rpm > celt051-0.5.1.3-0.el5.src.rpm > etherboot-5.4.4-10.el5.src.rpm >

What's the deal with all of the new dependencies for xulrunner-devel in the last update? I'm updating my servers and the update for xulrunner-devel is forcing me to install 43 new packages! Is this a packaging problem, or are all of those packages really needed? For the moment, I've been removing xulrunner-devel from my machines to avoid the problem. I figure since it is a

This package has a build requirement 'gecko-devel' which is fulfilled by 'xulrunner-devel'. But in the process of building the browser plugins two tools named 'xpidl' and 'xpt_link' are necessary. They werde once part of 'gecko-devel' but are now replaced by other tools. I haven't found any package that has these tools all the way back to 5.0. Maybe

Hello all, I was upgrading a CentOS 5.1 box to 5.2 remotely, and I lost my ssh connection to the server. Now when I rerun the "yum upgrade" it fails due to conflicts in the transaction check stage. Before I dig myself a deeper hole, I think I need advice. The original error I received was a conflict between python-devel and python, so I erased python-devel with the plan to