similar to: calbacks on models

Hi Guys, How can run the single spec file without loading the environment. I know ruby spec commands will load the total environment. I want to run the files one by one those are not in same folder and i want to load test environment once for all 10 files. Can we run single file through the Rspec:Core:Runner or some other class? Can you guys please help me? -Thanks -------------- next part

All, I''ve found that the html view for the rspec formatter falls to pieces with Rails 2.02 and rspec 1.10. Has anyone else run into this trouble? Here''s a monkey patch that fixes the problem. A more elegant fix would be in order, but this gets the job done: Index: /Users/timcharper/www/exchange/vendor/plugins/rspec/lib/spec/runner/formatter/text_mate_formatter.rb

Hi guys, I''m trying to find some information on how to get autotest to run the rspec2 tests. I have my project setup so "rake spec" runs the specs properly, but autotest seems to ignore/don''t know that there are specs to test. I read on the rspec2 wiki that autotest integration is o be added eventually. Any ideas on how to achieve this? Thanks, Jeroen

I''m using the standard webrick server with puppet, and I just started getting this today (for no apparent reason). info: Loading fact custom_facts info: Retrieving plugins err: /File[/var/puppet/lib]: Failed to generate additional resources during transaction: Certificates were not trusted: tlsv1 alert decrypt error err: /File[/var/puppet/lib]: Failed to retrieve current state of

I''ve been looking for the definitive answer for months now, and the RSpec book doesn''t touch on it at all: How do we now handle stubbing out rendering of partials in view specs in RSpec2? I have a large (35K+ lines of views and related specs) that I''m trying to upgrade to Rails3/RSpec2. My views use partials pretty extensively and this issue is a huge blocker for me.

Andy Shipman wrote: > When running spork on a merb application, whenever a spec is run I get > the following error from the Spork server. > > /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/merb-core-1.0.11/lib/merb-core/bootloader.rb:1358: > [BUG] rb_gc_mark(): unknown data type 0x3c(0x2203d0) non object > ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-08 patchlevel 173) [i686-darwin9] > > Which crashes the

I''m trying to test registration emails (sent with devise), and I keep getting the error: Net::SMTPServerBusy: 454 4.7.1 <model_spec-hcDgGtZH8xNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>: Relay access denied I''m running Rails 3.2.11 with Capybara, and I have (temporarily) chopped my spec_helper.rb and test.rb files down to the bare minimum, still getting the error above.

I am using rails edge. I am using gem "rspec-rails", "= 2.0.0.beta. 19" . I have following code at spec/models/user_spec.rb require ''spec_helper'' describe User do it { should validate_presence_of(:email) } it { should validate_presence_of(:name) } end Here is my gemfile group :development, :test do gem ''factory_girl_rails'',

Just brainstorming here, but what if each CODE_OWNER maintained a spork on Github and accepted Pull Requests? What's a spork, you ask? Well it's fork with no intent to diverge - it spoons some centralized repo (be it via git or git-svn). If you haven't heard the term 'spork' in this context before, it's either because I just made it up or that we share the same

One of my controllers directly renders some JSON output that I would like to test with RSpec. For that I use ''response.should have_text("foobar")'' in my spec file, but that leads to a Failure/Error: response.should have_text("enim") undefined method `has_text?'' for #<ActionController::TestResponse: 0xb6736944> I read here somewhere that webrat

I''m having a wee bit of trouble building documentation for Edge Rails (rev 7187). When I attempt to run the doc:rails taask (or any doc:* task), I get the following error: -- BEGIN -- rake aborted! uninitialized constant RubyToken::AlreadyDefinedToken /Users/jherdman/Projects/crosslisting/vendor/rails/activerecord/ lib/../../activesupport/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:263:in

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > Just brainstorming here, but what if each CODE_OWNER maintained a spork on > Github and accepted Pull Requests? What's a spork, you ask? Well it's > fork with no intent to diverge - it spoons some centralized repo (be it via > git or git-svn). If you haven't heard the term

Hi folks, I''m going through railstutorial.org and so I apologize if I''m hitting the wrong group here and would appreciate any appropriate redirection if necessary. I''ve set up Spork + Autotest as per Michael''s instructions in http://ruby.railstutorial.org/chapters/static-pages#sec:testing_tools Essentially by doing the following (using rvm & I''m

Hello, I have a Rails3beta4 project where I want to use rSpec stubs in a Cucumber feature. Unfortunately it looks like requiring ''spec/stubs/cucumber'' in env.rb does not work anymore: I get a "no such file to load -- spec/stubs/cucumber (LoadError)" error. Is it possible to use rSpec stubs in Cucumber with rSpec2? If not, is there any other viable alternative? Thanks

Also, don't forget the option I gave you Ralph, where you can have access to one of my VPSes. We can create a subdomain for free, but if you want something like nhw.com, you'd have to register the domain name yourself, which wouldn't cost too much money.... Then I can help configure it to point to your page on my VPS. I'll host it all for free. You'll have your own user

I''m getting the following error when i either checkout or update from svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/rspec/trunk svn: Error processing command ''mv'' in ''C:\work\rspec2\RSpec.tmbundle\Preferences'' svn: Can''t move source to dest svn: Cannot rename file ''C:\work\rspec2\RSpec.tmbundle\Preferences\.svn\tmp\text-base\Symbol List:

Hi. I''m trying to use Spork (actually spork-testunit, last git version) with Rails 3. My setup is correct, I manage to launch Spork (through bundle exec) and testdrb. But I cannot succeed to have my models reloaded. Spork-testunit''s doc says to put the loading commands in the prefork block, which I did. Nobody seems to require the use of Spork#trap_method. What is the good

I think the main benefit of a scheme like this would be that a pull request tells a code owner which patches require their attention. As a contributor it would be nice to see your patch in a queue somewhere rather than just be buried down the mailing list. When patches are sent to llvm-commits it can be hard to tell if a code owner has noticed the patch because it is a very high-volume list.

Hi all, I know this is probably more of a JRuby question but I''m guessing that people on this list may have gone down this path before. At work we are starting a new project using JRuby. The startup speed for testing an app is very painful. Nailgun helps a lot with that. It only helps with the slow startup time of JRuby though and does not address the use case of having gems

I am working on my first Rails BDD project with extensive tests since starting out with Rails a few years ago. Running RSpec or Cucumber is really slow. I''m using Rails 3 and RSpec 2. To run one model spec with only 5 tests takes almost 1 minute! When it finishes it says it took only 0.9 seconds to run the actual test. So obviously it is loading the environment that takes so long. I just