similar to: i386 and x86_64 depsolver issue with Seamonkey

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "i386 and x86_64 depsolver issue with Seamonkey"

2004 Aug 05
4
newest up2date rpm
i updated to the latest up2date rpm.... then when updating to the latest kernel this is what happened after i ran up2date -fu for the kernel/kernel-source updates Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/up2date", line 1174, in ? sys.exit(main() or 0) File "/usr/sbin/up2date", line 772, in main
2006 Aug 08
2
Help with up2date updates
I got this updates to do but the package requires a newer version of mozilla, and I can't install it, I get the following error message. Thanks There was a package dependency problem. The message was: Unresolvable chain of dependencies: devhelp-0.10-0.2.el4.centos4 requires mozilla = 37:1.8 The following packages were added to your selection to satisfy dependencies: Package
2006 Aug 06
3
Seamonkey
I saw the latest update announcements on the announce list, so I ran "yum check-update" and did not see seamonkey in the list. Which I guess makes sense, since it's a name change from mozilla. However, devhelp is in the list, and "yum update devhelp" pulls in seamonkey as a dependency. This seems like a sort of backdoor way to get seamonkey onto the system. Did these
2007 Feb 24
1
CESA-2007:0077 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 seamonkey - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0077 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0077.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: devhelp-0.10-0.7.el4.x86_64.rpm devhelp-devel-0.10-0.7.el4.x86_64.rpm seamonkey-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm seamonkey-chat-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm
2007 Feb 25
1
CESA-2007:0077 Critical CentOS 4 s390(x) seamonkey - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0077 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0077.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.s390.rpm
2007 Feb 24
1
CESA-2007:0077 Critical CentOS 4 i386 seamonkey - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0077 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0077.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: devhelp-0.10-0.7.el4.i386.rpm devhelp-devel-0.10-0.7.el4.i386.rpm seamonkey-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.i386.rpm seamonkey-chat-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.i386.rpm seamonkey-devel-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.i386.rpm
2007 Feb 24
1
CESA-2007:0077 Critical CentOS 4 ia64 seamonkey - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0077 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0077.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: files: updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.ia64.rpm
2010 May 28
3
CentOS 5 and seamonkey
Has anyone had any success in rebuilding seamonkey 2.0.4 for CentOS 5 (32-bit)? I'm currently running seamonkey-2.0-1 which I rebuilt last November. Sadly, I have no idea where the SRPM originated. I found seamonkey-2.0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm and seamonkey-2.0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm, downloaded and got to 0th base: [rj at madeleine Downloads]$ rpmbuild --rebuild
2009 Jan 30
1
Seamonkey and flash-plugin
Hello! I like using Seamonkey; I have v1.1.13 on Centos. It works with flash-plugin-10.0.12.36-release.i386.rpm. On my home computer, I have Fedora Core 9; Seamonkey + flash-plugin used to work with the same version combination above. Unfortunately, I updated Seamonkey to v1.1.15, and every time I go to a site (ex. http://www.wtopnews.com/ ) that's a flash user, Seamonkey crashes.
2007 Apr 22
2
RE: seamonkey?
What happened to seamonkey? I thought firefox was retired in 4 and replaced by seamonkey. Imagine my surprise when 5 came with firefox. What's a guy to do? TIA Russel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070422/84f76e3c/attachment-0004.html>
2008 Sep 14
2
SeaMonkey RPM for CentOS 5.2 (32 bit) is in which Yum Repository?
I'm curious about SeaMonkey (especially the HTML Composer). Which Yum Repository has the RPM for CentOS 5.2 (32 bit). TIA! [root at dell2400 ~]# yum install seamonkey Loading "priorities" plugin Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * google: dl.google.com * rpmforge: fr2.rpmfind.net * extras: mirror.cs.vt.edu * updates:
2007 Aug 23
2
flash player on seamonkey 1.0.9 x86_64 centos 4.5
I downoaded flash9 for linux. Installed it: ls /usr/lib64/mozilla-seamonkey-1.0.9/plugins/ flashplayer.xpt libflashplayer.so libnullplugin.so However seamonkey is not doing flash yet. Does it not work in 64 bit? Did I miss something? Anyone else have flash going on amd64? I thought you put the files in the above directory and restart. Didn't work for me. Jerry
2006 Sep 06
3
yum vs up2date
Which is better? Why? I know yum is the official update mechanism here and in Fedora Core, but that doesn't make yum better than up2date any more than Windows NT was better than OS/2. Let's try to keep the discussion objective:-) I'm asking, hoping for some insights into why RH might (apparently) be moving to yum in preference to up2date (yum is now used within Anaconda). Other
2006 Sep 04
1
mozilla and seamonkey
I have an XPI that I used to apply to mozilla. seamonkey is now loaded instead of mozilla. even if I do a "yum install mozilla" I still get seamonkey. How do I get mozilla. My XPI does not seem to work with seamonkey... THanks, Jerry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2008 Feb 07
1
Seamonkey (with plugins) as Firefox replacement?
Hi, I'm running CentOS 5.1 with the GNOME desktop in all our public libraries around here. I start from a minimal install stripped down to the bones, install X11, GNOME, and then one application per task. I try to follow some best-of-the-breed logic, and my focus lies on robustness to avoid the Tamagotchi syndrome :o) Recently I've been rather disappointed with Mozilla Firefox, which
2008 Jan 08
4
Probably OT: Has anyone else seen SeaMonkey 'pop' without warning?
I sent a bug report to Mozilla about this, but I was hoping someone here might have an insight on this. I use SeaMonkey as my default browser (32-bit even though I'm running x86_64 CentOS 5.1), version 1.1.7. Shortyl after installing 1.1.7 on my 5.0 (and even since 5.1), I noticed that every so often, seemingly at random, although it appears most frequently when I click on something that
2007 Apr 04
1
seamonkey on Centos 2.1 deletes itself!
Well, partly: I've been "converting" a RHL 7.3 system to approximately Centos 2.1, so found it necessary to "rpm -Va" I was more than a little surprised at this: [root at magpie root]# rpm -V seamonkey missing /usr/lib/mozilla-seamonkey-1.0.8/chrome/overlayinfo/browser missing /usr/lib/mozilla-seamonkey-1.0.8/chrome/overlayinfo/browser/content missing
2016 Jan 08
2
Centos 3.8 Server Questions, SeaMonkey Mozilla and Java
In order to run a certain software package that runs as a java applet I had to install Centos 3.8 on a 32-bit server. After installation I upgraded the installation using yum after repointing the configuration file to vault.centos.org. This worked fine, however, I still have to resolve two problems: - I'd would like to make the EPEL repository available but have not been able to find if old
2012 Oct 19
1
SeaMonkey on CentOS 6.3
Been a while since I used seamonkey, but needed it yesterday. The old version I had installed (2.11) threw an error when I tried it, so I grabbed 2.12.1 from mozilla.com. It throws the same error: $ /usr/local/seamonkey/seamonkey & [1] 7050 $ XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/local/seamonkey/libxpcom.so: libxul.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Couldn't
2006 Sep 13
2
ports / www/linux-seamonkey / flashplugin vulnerability
Hi! Since linux-flashplugin7 r63 is vulnerable according to http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/7c75d48c-429b-11db-afae-000c6ec775d9.html isn't www/linux-seamonkey vulerable, too (it seems to include 7 r25)? Bye Arne __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com