similar to: [rspec-rails-2] conflict with view isolation and respond_with

rspec-rails version 1.2.0 has been released! * <http://rspec.info/> * <http://wiki.github.com/dchelimsky/rspec> * <http://wiki.github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/rails> * <http://wiki.github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/upgrades> Behaviour Driven Development for Ruby on Rails. Changes: ### Version 1.2.0 IMPORTANT INFORMATION: Due to changes in Rails-2.3, there are some changes in

rspec-rails version 1.2.9 has been released! * <http://rspec.info> * <http://rubyforge.org/projects/rspec> * <http://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec-rails> * <http://wiki.github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/rails> * <rspec-devel at rubyforge.org> Behaviour Driven Development for Ruby on Rails. Changes: ### Version 1.2.9 / 2009-10-05 * enhancements * added route_to and

Greetings! Here''s the problem. When running tests on the restful_authentication plugin, I am getting a routing error on "/". Which I don''t really understand, because the route "/" certainly does exist as I can confirm when I run ./script/server and point my browser at http://localhost:3000/ Here is an example of the error I am getting when I run

Hi, I''ve been investigating plain text stories, and I had a quick question. How would I go about creating story tests for views in isolation, instead of the full stack? I had hoped to be able to do a straight render ''/'', but it says it can''t find the method. The reason that I want to do this is that I want to give our designer/business people a way to write

Hello, I''m completely new to Rspec testing and I''m finding it very difficult to mock specific objects. In this test, I have a before block setup as such: [code] before do setup_controller_for_warden controller.session[:operation_id] = 1 @operator = Factory :operator sign_in :operator, @operator @persist_herd = Herd.new

> > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 06:35:01 -0700 > From: David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [rspec-users] Coloured output in rspec 1.1.4 > To: rspec-users at rubyforge.org > Message-ID: <175B70FE-B706-4C03-8B20-C5B207268AD6 at gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes > > On May 29, 2008,

Howdy, I have emailed before about the inconsistencies I''m spotting when using named routes/resource, but I think I''ve narrowed down the issue. It would seem this has nothing to do with rspec per se, but more with how routing works with rails. If you have an object instance, that isn''t saved and you attempt to generate a path for that item, even though the item may

Hi all, For those of you checking out the Rails 2.0 preview release: RSpec-1.0.8 does not support Rails 2.0. Unfortunately, we''re in the middle of some big changes to the internals in trunk and won''t be in a position to do a release for another week or so. Therefore, if you are using the Rails 2.0 preview, you''ll need to use the RSpec trunk. Additionally, right now

Hi all, We''ve moved the rspec website to http://rspec.info. We want http://rspec.org, of course, but someone is squatting on and has yet to respond to my email :( The 1.1.0 docs are there. The 1.0.8 docs are still at http://rspec.rubyforge.org for the time being. We''ll be archiving them at the new site soon. This new site is hosted on our shiny new sponsored slice at Engine

The RSpec Development Team is happy to announce the release of RSpec-1.1.4. See http://rspec.info/changes.html for details of what changed in this release. For Rails developers: * This release of RSpec supports Rails-2.1.0-RC1, 2.0.2, 1.2.6 More info at http://rspec.info. Cheers, David

Hi, I have a project that I had running under rspec 0.6.x and recently upgraded to 0.7.2. I am trying to isolate my controllers from the database as I go through and change all the specs to run under 0.7.2. I am having a problem where I need to make the create! method return the mocked object as well as raise RecordInvalid exception. Is this at all possible? I use the rescue statement in my

The RSpec Development Team is pleased to announce the release of RSpec-1.0.8. RSpec 1.0.6 is the "holy cow, batman, it''s been a long time since we released and there are a ton of bug fixes, patches and even new features" release. RSpec 1.0.7 and 1.0.8 deal with a regression introduced in 1.0.6 and a hiccup in releasing 1.0.7, respectively. == RSpec RSpec is a Behaviour Driven

I am following the examples in chapter 2 of "Rails 3 in Action" and for some reason I have to specify the full path + file name to get my specs to run. The book and rspec docs led me to believe that I should be able to just type ''rspec'' and rspec would find any spec files in a directory called spec. I even tried adding a .rspec file with "--default_path spec"

The RSpec Development Team is pleased to announce the release of RSpec 0.7.5. This release adds support for Heckle - Seattle''rb''s code mutation tool. There are also several bug fixes to the RSpec core and the RSpec on Rails plugin. Changes: http://rspec.rubyforge.org/changes.html Download: http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=797 or gem install rspec Happy spec''ing,

I have the latest version of rspec and rails-rspec installed. I''m using the debian versions of ruby and rails. On a new project after a generate an "rspec_model" and then try to run "rake spec", I get the following error: dan at dan-server:~/projects/cw/registration$ rake spec (in /home/dan/projects/cw/registration)

> > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:47:22 -0500 > From: David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [rspec-users] rspec and rspec-rails install hell > To: rspec-users <rspec-users at rubyforge.org> > Message-ID: <EFE63242-19E9-42C5-AACD-16E239A9023B at gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes

I''m using RSpec on Rails and would like to clean up the backtraces, so I went looking for an RSpec equivalent to ThoughtBot''s Quiet Backtrace gem<http://thoughtbot.com/projects/quietbacktrace>. I found Spec::Runner::QuietBacktraceTweaker in the RDOCS, but I can''t figure out how to use it. Can I add something to spec_helper.rb that will utilize

Can anyone (David?) shed some light on what exactly this warning is complaining about? I started seeing it when I upgraded to Rails 2.1 RC1 and the latest RSpec from git. I''m getting it in some helper specs that I''m writing. And yes, I am including a module there, to reuse some utility methods I originally wrote for my controller tests (I''m switching to specs

Good morning rspec people! Still rspec nuby: I must do something wrong obviously. How can I spec about redirect_to at ApplicationController describe ApplicationController do it "method login_required should redirect to home path without login" do pending "I tried to use controller.login_required.should be_redirected and got NoMethodError with nil object

Hey guys, Does anyone have any wisdom to share on the subject of speccing Rails layouts? Most of it''s plain old view specs stuff, but are there sensible ways to verify things like the yield call? (Mocking doesn''t catch that) Thanks, Matt -- Matt Patterson | Design & Code <matt at reprocessed org> | http://www.reprocessed.org/