similar to: Mock "Consent_6335" received unexpected message :marked_for_destruction? with (no args)

I''ve asked this before, but never got a working response. I''d like to store an object inside a binary field in my db. So I''d have a class like this class MyAwesomeClass def do_something_awesome ... end end then class MyRecord < ActiveRecord::Base end the table my_record would have a binary field, my_object, that would store an object of

Hi All, I''m trying to use a form to upload a photo that I will save using attachment_fu. I''m very new to Facebookr so I apologize if this is covered somewhere, but I''m kind of stumped. Here''s what I''m doing now: <% facebook_form_for(:my_object, :url => { :action => ''upload_photo'', :id => params[:id] }, :html => {

Hy guys, Inside my app I have a form which contains user information. Sometimes a have a form with a text_field as above: <%= form_remote_tag(:html => { :action => url_for(:controller => "my_controller", :action => "my_action") }) %> <%= text_field(''my_object'', ''my_parameter'', :maxlength =>

The new "pending" example feature reminds me of a feature I''ve been bouncing around in my head, to aid in refactoring. Often, when I''m changing existing behaviour, I know that certain aspects of the old behaviour should change. Imagine changing the "it" method to perhaps "not" or "old" or "removed"... The behaviour would be to

Hi all, I''m trying to pass more than one parameters using link_to_remote, but I''m getting a behaviour that seems quite strange to me. Here''s the code: link_to_remote ''some text'', :update => ''form'', :method => ''get'', :url => { :action =>

There are areas of my application that "want" to use a url structure like domain/<human_readable_param>/<Module>/<Controller>/<Action>/<Id> Please note that the human readable parameter I need to inject is NOT related to the <id> being used by the action/controller pair. It''s identifying a container object whose contains are operated

Hello How can I test equality with two objects when they include some attribute that is BigDecimal? if I make something like this: it "should ...whatever" do obj = Factory.create(:my_object) ... MyObject.first.should == obj end. FAILS This fails because the object expected is different from the object gotten, and the only difference are the BigDecimal attributes, that are

I would like to use the collection_select with a simply array as the source of the collection. My array looks like this: STATES = ["Alabama", "Alaska", "Texas"] and it is stored in my environment.rb I can''t figure out the syntax for the collection_select in this situation... collection_select("my_object", "state", what goes here??? ) I

I didn''t get a chance to go to this meeting debating WebObjects Vs Rails, but here''s a report about it: http://desperatepundit.com/blog/cremes/technology/2006/02/15/WebObjects-versus-Ruby-On-Rails.html I don''t get what he''s saying, hand coding the model? yeah, you COULD ... but what about script/generate ??? And is that so what he said about security? --

Hi! Well, I thought this was easy, but for some reason it won''t work... Here is what I want to do: I am working on an API to a large database. The basic mapping is done, but I want to implement some convenience methods that take information for one object and does some calculations with it. The result should be accessible as attribute. So in a simple example: We have an object that

AFAICT this appears to be the first time you've clarified that you're talking about a situation where the compile-time checking happens using something other than format strings. In Pavel's original email, he suggested compile time checking and you mentioned that I didn't object to it. But if you go back and read my response, I said we can do the compile time checking *of the

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:40 PM Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > On Oct 12, 2016, at 12:35 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > > You get compile time checking automatically when we can use c++14 though. > If you use it with a string literal, you'll get compile time checking, > otherwise you won’t. > > > I understand that, but

In a controller run through webrick I do this: @entity = Entity.new print @entity.methods.sort.to_yaml and I see this: - logger - mark_for_destruction - marked_for_destruction? - metaclass - method - method_missing - methods - new_record? There is no method_exists? method. If I instead do this in a console session, I see this: $ script/console >> >> @entity = Entity.new =>

Using EmailSpec, I am testing the format of emails sent from an observer. I can verify the deliver_to address, the bcc_to address, and that the message body has the appropriate text. However, when I test the deliver_from, I am getting an error saying my deliver_from is nil, though when I follow the same steps in development, an email is sent with the appropriate from address. This is the

Hello: How do i make a mutiple select list for "nomodel" objects?I made that by using something like:<select name="" multiple="mutiple"><%=option groups collection for select(....)-%></select>.But when i select mutiple items and submit them,I can only get one selected item? Who can help me? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

How do I get ''save'' to execute without commit? I have tried: ActiveRecord::Base.connection.begin_db_transaction # do some stuff that doesn''t issue a database COMMIT statement # then: @myObject.save # this issues a COMMIT but it shouldn''t! Shouldn''t it wait until I''ve called: ActiveRecord::Base.connection.commit_db_transaction ? what am

I''ve notice that a project like Rubinius has both a spec & a test directory. Rspec has only a spec directory. Obviously I support BDD, but isn''t there also a place for state based/verification testing? I sometimes sense that I *do* want to practice Test Driven Development. That is, I want some assurance that my production code will run as intended. But I also

I can''t seem to figure out how to validate a few fields some1 please help me out model--------- class Record < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :sw, :flex end controller------------ class RecordController < A;;icationController def new @record = Rrecord.new @product = Product.find(params[''product_id'']) end def create

rspec-1.3.1.rc and rspec-rails-1.3.3.rc are released! These are release candidate gems for updates 1.x series, including some bug fixes and deprecation warnings for functionality that will be removed in rspec-2. Barring unexpected complications, I''ll release final versions of these gems within the next week. Cheers, David

You get compile time checking automatically when we can use c++14 though. If you use it with a string literal, you'll get compile time checking, otherwise you won't. Here's a different example though. Suppose you're writing a tool which prints formatted output, and the field width is specified by the user. Now you NEED to build the format string at runtime, there's no other