similar to: This test should pass, but it does not :-/ Why?

I''m trying to create a simple authentication system but am failing miserably. I''m (sort of) following the "Logging In" chapter of the Agile book. Ideally, any access to http://example.com/publish (and any of its subdirectories) should redirect to http:/example.com/publish/login when there is no valid session user_id. Code so far:

ok, i''ve done a render_component(:controller => "user", :action => "user_menu"); user_menu checks for session id, if does not exist, render_component(:controller => "user", :action => "login") [all of this is working fine, thanks]. when i try to login, the form action goes to login_user, which tries to login via the User model and

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=909 Summary: nat destroy packet mark Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P5 Component: NAT AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

Hi! I have exactly the same problem on asterisk 1.8.22.0 and also on separate 11.2.1 when sending fax to PSTN. Tryed with spa-3102, spa-2102, Patton Smartnode 4634, and Zoiper softphone. SpanDsp also works without any problem on my box. As I remember it was a bug in 1.8.1.x that the a=T38MaxBitRate paramater was sent as "maxBitRate". Without capital "M". Are you closer to

Hi all, I am trying to create an out-of-tree LLVM project. I have written a Test project following the guide in [1] that triggers the problem. Pass body is in [2]. The CMakeLists.txt file for the "root" directory is in [3] The CMakeLists.txt file for the "pass" directory is in [4] When I run opt --load=libTest.so I trigger the following assertion: opt: CommandLine.cpp:134:

Hi, I have setup samba 3.6.6 witch openldap (rfc2307bis schema). My problem is that samba do not recognise groups members from member attribure. when I setup members into memberuid atribute all works corect. how can I instruct samba to use member atribute? -- Alexandr Seidl

Hello Sergey, thanks for the suggestion. The name of the pass is not what triggers the assertion. The test case I attached to the email is a stripped-down version of a much more complicated pass (with a proper name) that originally caused the problem. Also, to be sure, I just tried to change the name of the pass to something more significant. It did not work. Cheers, Alberto On Sun, Aug 10,

Hello list, I''ve had this problem for two days now. Perhaps someone here would care to comment on it. I''d be REALLY appreciative if that''d be the case. Basically, it''s outlined at this paste: http://rafb.net/paste/results/ kXQSHZ83.html But I''ll paste it here, too. The main problem is in the customers/list action. The problem is with this line:

Hello rails, I have a controller called file with a method get that returns me a file from the db. want to do the following: When calling http://localhost:8080/file/get/11/hansi.txt i want that rails does the same as if i would call http://localhost:8080/file/get/11 This i not the case. I get a 404. This is useful as this makes the filename in the browser downloading the

Hi all. My dovecot setup: pf at vulcan:~ ? dovecot --version 2.3.0 (c8b89eb) on Arch Linux, x86_64 (full config here: [0]) uses sieve plugin to train rspamd system as described in the wiki [1]. It used to work fine prior to 2.3.0/0.5.0 update, but now "imap" process crashes when I move spam letters from the inbox to the junk folder. I've recompiled both dovecot and pigeonhole

I''ve got the following expectation: response.should redirect_to(:action => "new", :video_id => "1", :process_id => "2", :origin_id => "3") that fails with this error message: expected redirect to {:video_id=>"1", :process_id=>"2", :origin_id=>"3", :action=>"new"}, got redirect to

Hi James, > We probably don't want them committed in git where they're evaluation > runs (because we can recreate them); a gist might be more appropriate. Sorry, I have moved results files over to gist for each individual weighting scheme. Link: https://gist.github.com/ivmarkp/secret > I can't tell, but are some of those files from FIRE? If so, they > shouldn't be

I am a first time poster, so I apologize if this is an obvious question or out of scope for LLVM. I am an LLVM user. I don't really know anything about hacking on LLVM, but I do know a bit about compilation generally. I am on x86-64 and I am interested in structure reads, writes, and constants being optimized to use vector registers when the alignment and sizes are right. I have created a

I haven't fully parsed this thread (sorry!), but I wanted to briefly mention that the SafeStack & ASan passes both do something similar (I think): move local variables backed by allocas onto a separate stack. These passes use replaceDbgDeclare to rewrite dbg.declares s.t. they point into the new stack. After that, llvm presumably runs LowerDbgDeclare (usually via InstCombine), but all the

Me again! Think we've found it. By diving into the LXC logs for the specific container, we found this: 2014-04-17 21:07:06.066+0000: 2861: debug : virCgroupSetValueStr:678 : Set value '/sys/fs/cgroup/devices/machine/oshi32134.libvirt-lxc/devices.allow' to 'c 189:130 rw' Looks like libvirt the permission to 'rw', not 'rmw' [1], so no surprise that when it

I put the complete error description into a gist (https://gist.github.com/5d2cef1414f1643fca5a) for better readability. The basic problem is that a properly encoded Json post request gets decoded an a very weird way. For example a "ü" which is encoded as "\u00fc" in uft-8 becomes ">\x93" or "~\xD4". I get different results ever time I run the decoder.

Hello! I have installed postfix with dovecot and postgresql. I have set up SASL authentication for postfix and dovecot and been able to test them successfully. I am able to send sasl authenticated emails through smtpd on postfix using a mail client like Thunderbird. However, now I am unable to receive any e-mails. When I respond to the emails, I get a not delivered failure from postfix. I cannot

Sadly I really can’t help you debug the home-brew build, it is a good ways outside my expertise. If you want to try building from source using the guide here: http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#getting-started-quickly-a-summary <http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#getting-started-quickly-a-summary> I’d be more helpful. As it is, the patch you proposed doesn’t seem to make it

Hello! Can anyone explain why my Unicorn installation (for RoR site) have so many worker threads? * screenshot: http://i.stack.imgur.com/U9TFR.png * unicorn.rb: https://gist.github.com/907th/4995323 Thanks!

Hello, I''m playing around with Rspec again after going from test/unit to rspec then back to test/unit... :) Right off the bat, I find myself wanting to do something like this: https://gist.github.com/1128091 Basically, I want to name a context, then call it later by name, passing a block to it. Or in other words... what is the best way to DRY this code?