similar to: defining "id" argument in geeglm

Dear all, I am trying to use the GEE methodology to fit a trend for the number of butterflies observed at several sites. In total, there are 66 sites, and 19 years for which observations might be available. However, only 326 observations are available (instead of 1254). For the time being, I ignore the large number of missing values, and the fact that GEE is only valid under MCAR. When I run the

Dear all, I need to fit a gee model with an auto-regressive correlation structure and I faced some problems. I attach a simple example: ####################################################### library(gee) library(geepack) # I SIMULATE DATA FROM POISSON DISTRIBUTION, 10 OBS FOR EACH OF 50 GROUPS set.seed(1) y <- rpois(500,50) x <- rnorm(500) id <- rep(1:50,each=10) # EXAMPLES FOR

Hi, I'm running GEE using geepack. I set corstr = "ar1" as below: > m.ar <- geeglm(L ~ O + A, + data = firstgrouptxt, id = id, + family = binomial, corstr = "ar1") > summary(m.ar) Call: geeglm(formula = L ~ O + A, family = binomial, data = firstgrouptxt, id = id, corstr = "ar1") Coefficients:

Hello R-helpers, I would like to calculate the standard error for the predicted value from geeglm. As an example, I would like to calculate the GEE mean of treatments and their standard error. I first specified the model as mod <- geeglm(resp ~ trt, data=dat,id=id,family=Gaussian,corstr="ar1",weights=weight) Then I predicted the GEE mean and se using the following code

I'm using the package geepack to fit GEE models. Does anyone know of methods for add1 and drop1 for a 'geeglm' model object, or perhaps a method for extractAIC based on the QIC of Pan 2001? I see there has been some mention of this on R-help a few years ago (RSiteSearch("QIC")). The package does provide an anova method for its model objects, and update() seems to work:

Dear all I am struggling with how to deal with missing values using geeglm. I know that geeglm only works with complete datasets, but I cannot seem to get the na.omit function to work. For example assuming DataMiss contains 3 columns, each of which has missing observations, and an id column with no missing info then identifies the clusters. Outcome: 2 level integer Predictor: numeric variable

Hi, I'm analyzing my data using GEE, which looks like below: > interact <- geeglm(L ~ O + A + O:A, + data = data1, id = id, + family = binomial, corstr = "ar1") > summary(interact) Call: geeglm(formula = lateral ~ ontask + attachment + ontask:attachment, family = binomial, data = firstgroupnowalking, id = id, corstr = "ar1") Coefficients:

Dear all, Is it possible to incorporate a nested design in GEE? I have measurements on trees that where measured in two years. The trees are nested in plots. Each plot contains 24 trees. The number of plots is 72. Hence we would expect 2 * 24 * 72 = 3456 data points. A few are missing, so we end up wih 3431 data points. This is what I have tried until now. #assuming independence between trees

? stato filtrato un testo allegato il cui set di caratteri non era indicato... Nome: non disponibile Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20070905/6d1002c1/attachment.pl

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20091126/7134fc17/attachment-0001.pl>

I'm writing a paper aimed at motivating the use of GEE within the field of economics. However, after computing using the geeglm function, I noticed there's one intercept in the summary output. I assume this means the function is pooling the data. That means my code is not what I want. I want a "fixed effects" model, meaning I want the intercept to vary by cluster. Here's

Dear all, I am trying to do a GEE on count data and I am having problems with how to order the data. Below is a simplified example of what my data looks like.. Route Time Day Pass Distance 1 30 1 4 0 1 60 1 12 200 1 120 1 25 600 1 30 2 8 0 1 60 2 17 200 1

Dear List: I found an error when I called the 'gee' function. I cannot solve and explain it. There are no errors when I used the 'geeglm' function. Both functions fit the gee model. The project supervisor recommends me to use the 'gee' function. But I cannot explain to him why this error happens. Would you help me solve this problem? I appreciate your help. In

Hi, I downloaded both gee and geepack, and I am trying to understand the differences between the two libraries. I used the same data and estimated the same model, with a correlation structure autoregressive of order 1. Surprisingly for me, I found very different results. Coefficients are slightly different in value but sometimes opposite in sign. Moreover, the estimate of rho (correlation

*H*i, I am trying to fit a GEE model with *geeglm* function. The model is the following: Modelo<-geeglm(sqrt ~Tra+ Mes, id=Lugar , data=datos, family=gaussian(identity), corstr="independence") *Tra( is a experimental treatment, 2 levels)*, *Mes* (is the month of take data, 4 levels) and *Lugar* (is the site of study, 3 levels) are categorical variables and *sqrt* (sqrt of Total

Hi A quick question. Standard errors reported by gee/yags differs from the ones in geeglm (geepack). require(gee) require(geepack) require(yags) mm <- gee(breaks ~ tension, id=wool, data=warpbreaks, corstr="exchangeable") mm2 <- geeglm(breaks ~ tension, id=wool, data=warpbreaks, corstr="exchangeable", std.err = "san.se") mm3 <- yags(breaks ~

Dear R users I am analysing data from a group of twins and their siblings. The measures that we are interested in are all correlated within families, with the correlations being stronger between twins than between non-twin siblings. The measures are all calculated from survey answers and by definition have limited ranges (e.g. -5 to +5), though within the range they are approximately normally

Hello Fellow R Users,I have spent the last week trying to find a work around to this problem and I can't seem to solve it. I simply want to plot my GEE model result with 95% confidence bands. I am using the geepack package to run a basic GEE model involving nestling weights, to a Gaussian distribution, with "exchangeable" error structure. I am examining how nestling weight varies

Hi A.K Regarding my question on comparing normal/ obese/overweight with blood pressure change, I did finally as per the first suggestion of stacking the data and creating a normal category . This only gives me a obese not obese 14, but when I did with the wide format hoping to get a obese14,normal14,overweight 14 Vs hibp 21, i could not complete any of the models. This time I classified obese=1

Dear R users Recently I received advice from this fine group on gee() and sample weights One suggestion was to use geeglm() I hope someone can help me to solve a problem that arises when converting a code from gee to geeglm. *Here is a code that I wrote with the original data, not weighted: * > m1 <- gee( Bin ~ educ+agemean+ residencysize + yearx , id = rad09 , data = Males,