similar to: MD5/Checksums for debug files?

Hello, I ftp'ed the binary RPM for samba from us6.samba.org, and when I tried to verify it, rpm said that MD5 was NOT OK. Has anyone else reported this behavior? Thanks, Hiten Sonpal sonpal@ciholas.com Engineer, CIHOLAS Enterprises Voice: 812 476 2721 x 102 2626 Kotter Ave, Unit #D Fax: 812 476 2881 Evansville, IN 47715 http://www.ciholas.com

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On 12/17/18 2:57 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 12:40 PM Kaushal Shriyan >> <kaushalshriyan at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Is there a way to find out how the CentOS 7.5 Linux box got infected >>> with malware? Currently i am referring to >>>

Downloaded from http://vault.centos.org/debuginfo/4/i386/ The file I received was 23-Aug-2006 06:18 298M. My ls showed 312932522. I presume this is an approximate match. Validation failed. # rpm --checksig kernel-debuginfo-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL.i686.rpm kernel-debuginfo-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL.i686.rpm: sha1 MD5 NOT OK The i586 file validates OK. TIA -- Bill

Hoping that this is not OT.. Hi I want to write a simple perl script to see if my system supports des or md5 as the password encryption scheme..what is the easiest way.. one of course is to look at the /etc/shadow file and then parsing the passwd field, any better way..?? Thx, Arni

Hi list, Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed from a 5.0 DVD I think). The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm -- checksig' test, yet when I run a 'yum upgrade' a large portion of them are corrupted and fail the GPG check. This seems to be isolated to yum, as downloading the RPM directly via FTP with wget or lftpget

I thought I'd install the binary RPM for Red Hat 7.1. Following the advice from the ReadMe I checked the GPG signature (sorry, I have very little idea what it is) of the .rpm files. Here is what I got. % rpm --checksig *.rpm R-base-1.3.1-3.i386.rpm: md5 GPG NOT OK R-recommended-1.3.1-1.i386.rpm: md5 (GPG) OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#97D3544E) Does it indicate any problem? Thanks, Vadim

>>>>> Tal Galili <tal.galili at gmail.com> >>>>> on Sun, 10 May 2015 23:13:09 +0300 writes: > Dear R-devel members, Several R user recently reported > <https://github.com/talgalili/installr/issues/30> (while > using the installr > <http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/installr>package) > that when running MD5

On 11/05/2015 4:31 AM, peter dalgaard wrote: > > On 11 May 2015, at 09:53 , Martin Maechler <maechler at lynne.stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: > >>>>>>> Tal Galili <tal.galili at gmail.com> >>>>>>> on Sun, 10 May 2015 23:13:09 +0300 writes: >> >>> Dear R-devel members, Several R user recently reported >>>

Thank you Duncan, Peter and Martin for the responses. Just to mention that the code is based on tools::md5sum, and the issue can be reproduced (in Windows) using: if(!require(installr)) install.packages("installr") installr::checkMD5sums2(dir=R.home()) With regards, Tal [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On 11 May 2015, at 09:53 , Martin Maechler <maechler at lynne.stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >>>>>> Tal Galili <tal.galili at gmail.com> >>>>>> on Sun, 10 May 2015 23:13:09 +0300 writes: > >> Dear R-devel members, Several R user recently reported >> <https://github.com/talgalili/installr/issues/30> (while >> using the

Dear R-devel members, Several R user recently reported <https://github.com/talgalili/installr/issues/30> (while using the installr <http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/installr>package) that when running MD5 checksums on a recent R installation (R 3.2.0), they get that the files ?bin/R.exe?, ?bin/Rscript.exe? have the wrong MD5 checksums on Windows. I intend to remove the test for

Hello dear R-devel, I am not sure if this issue is tracked or not, but in case it isn't: It appears that R 3.0.1 reproduces the error reported for R 3.0.0 here: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/R-3-0-0-wrong-MD5-checksums-for-Windows-td4663348.html That is, that when installing R 3.0.1 on Windows 7, and then running: require(tools) checkMD5sums(dir=R.home()) It produces the error: files

> On 11 May 2015, at 15:53 , Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 11/05/2015 9:35 AM, Tal Galili wrote: >> Hi Duncan, >> Thank you for the clarification. :) >> >> I ended up removing these files from being scanned in the updated version of installr. I would rather focus on supporting an MD5 scan that is based on what is listed in MD5

Hi Duncan, Thank you for the clarification. :) I ended up removing these files from being scanned in the updated version of installr. I would rather focus on supporting an MD5 scan that is based on what is listed in MD5 file itself (ignoring exceptions that are not clearly stated in the file). ----------------Contact Details:------------------------------------------------------- Contact

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: New majordomo packages available Advisory ID: RHSA-2000:005-05 Issue date: 2000-01-20 Updated on: 2000-05-31 Product: Red Hat Powertools Keywords: majordomo Cross references: N/A

Hello dear R-devel, When installing R 3.0.0 on Windows 7, and then running: require(tools) checkMD5sums(dir=R.home()) I get the following massage: files ‘etc/Rconsole’, ‘etc/Rprofile.site’ have the wrong MD5 checksums [1] FALSE This happens when using the 32 and the 64 bit version of R. And was also reported by 2 other users on other machines, as can be seen in the comments to this post:

On 12 March 2008, "William L. Maltby" <CentOS4Bill at triad.rr.com> wrote: > Message: 95 > Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:56:42 -0400 > From: "William L. Maltby" <CentOS4Bill at triad.rr.com> > Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 5 Evolution Update errors. > To: CentOS General List <centos at centos.org> > Message-ID: <1205323003.5338.6.camel at

List, I have a CentOS 4.0 server in my intranet which will serves as a CentOS repository updates, so I need a script to do that job, I can not use RSYNC. I just want to download CentOS 4.0 updates every night. Can you help me? Regards, Israel

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: Netscape 4.73 available Advisory ID: RHSA-2000:028-02 Issue date: 2000-05-19 Updated on: 2000-05-19 Product: Red Hat Linux Keywords: netscape SSL telnet rlogin Cross references:

Dear R experts, I hope this is the right list for my question. As a newcomer in R, I am testing the R CAPER package, applying a simple regression on a phylogeny tree with three binary traits: (t1, t2, t3). My goal is to test the sensitivity to a correlation between t1 and t3. But if a correlation of 100% is considered (i.e. t3 = t1). The pgls method of CAPER seems to crash: You can find there