similar to: Can R (without GUI) be compiled with static linking?

I am creating a Slovak translation of an interactive website ( http://mazamascience.com/OilExport/index_sk.html ) and am running into problems with R's lack of support for the caron found in the following letters: Č/č, Š/š and Ž/ž. I am using R 2.6.1 running on a recent version of CentOS. Any information about whether these characters are supported or any possible workarounds would be

I am developing a package for analysis of seismic data that relies on a Fortran library. Package compilation works fine on Ubuntu and Red Hat Enterprise but fails for R 2.15.3 on Mac OSX 10.8.4. I've included the entire dump below but the relevant error message seems to be: ld: warning: ignoring file libmseed/libmseed.a, file was built for archive > which is not the architecture being

Greetings, I am creating a standalone executable script using Rscript and have run into problems when I define a new S4 class. Here is a small script that demonstrates my problem: #!/usr/bin/env Rscript # # toy.Rscript -- testing S4 class creation in an Rscript setClass("toy", representation(name = "character", price = "numeric"),

Has anyone tried or had success statically linking Asterisk? I'd like to do this to deploy to smaller boxes that don't have the toolchain and libraries to build the thing. I've tried using statifier (at sf.net) which claims to take a dynamic executable and transform it into a static executable. It seemed to work on my box, but when I tried it on the target box it did this:

I had assumed you would treat phi nodes differently from other operations in that they don’t need to keep the block alive just to retain the data flow facts but it would be simplest to do that. Thanks Daniel From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org<mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org>> Date: Friday, January 29, 2016 at 10:26 PM To: David Callahan <dcallahan at

Hello all, I am trying to use cbind to add a named empty column to a Matrix: outputmatrix <- cbind(outputmatrix,kog_id = seq(0,0,0)) The problem I have is that kog_id is a variable that has a value e.g. "KOG1234", but I when I try to use this to name the added column, it is named literally "kog_id" instead of "KOG1234". How can I name a column by passing in a

I think you can also avoid the RDF computation using a more directed form of control dependence testing such as described in Keshav Pingali and Gianfranco Bilardi. 1997. Optimal control dependence computation and the Roman chariots problem. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 19, 3 (May 1997), 462-491. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/256167.256217 However one challenge seems to be fixing the SSA graph

Hello all, I am trying to use the micEcon 'insertRow' function inside a function I have written. For example: insert_row_test <- function(m){ insertRow(m,nrow(m)+1,v=0,rName="test") } However, when I try to call the 'insert_row_test' function (after loading the micEcon package), it does not insert a row into the matrix I pass in. When I call the insertRow

Thanks for the response. To clarify in your suggestion, llvm-link will combine the modules but not run the optimization pass, that is still delayed until the final binary is built, correct? My use case is apply LTO to roughly program subsets; sacrificing effectiveness to avoid scaling problems and to allow the artifacts to be reused like archives and cached like .o’s. I need to trigger the

Why does compiler-rt ship a shared object for ASan on Android instead of a static library? Would statically linking ASan on Android at least be safe for standalone executables? And if I'm wanting to use ASan in C++ code that is invoked from an APK, can I statically link ASan? If not, what is the reason we need to preload Dalvik with the ASan shared object? I assume static linking here

This document http://llvm.org/docs/Projects.html says the USEDLIBS should be used to statically link libraries: USEDLIBSThis variable holds a space separated list of libraries that should be linked into the program. These libraries must be libraries that come from your *lib* directory. The libraries must be specified without their "lib" prefix. For example, to link libsample.a, you

Maybe I was too quick here. Does gcc record the incoming edge to a phi? If so, won’t those change when you delete blocks in a non-trivial manner? How are those updated? From: David Callahan <dcallahan at fb.com<mailto:dcallahan at fb.com>> Date: Saturday, January 30, 2016 at 7:02 AM To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org<mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org>>, Hal Finkel

(and sys::cas_flag that STATISTIC uses is a uint32 ...) On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > Okay, dumb question: > Are you really getting negative numbers in the second column? > > 526,766 -136 mem2reg # PHI nodes inserted > > http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/PromoteMemoryToRegister_8cpp_source.html >

Thanks Also I found that some cases are also caught by a specialized routine to remove dead loops which is missing the case I noticed. odavd From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org<mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org>> Date: Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 8:45 PM To: David Callahan <dcallahan at fb.com<mailto:dcallahan at fb.com>>, LLVM Dev Mailing list <llvm-dev at

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"David Callahan via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > *To: *"Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin.org>, "LLVM Dev Mailing list" < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > *Sent: *Thursday, January 28, 2016

I am interested in putting together a tool which can verify that an external declaration conforms with the actual definition. A.c: extern int32_t foo(); Int bar() { return foo(); } B.c: int64_t foo() { ... } I had thought that I could use the debug information but the debug information in A.o does not include the type of the declaration "foo", just the type of bar. Is there a way to

+eugenis@ On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote: > Why does compiler-rt ship a shared object for ASan on Android instead > of a static library? Would statically linking ASan on Android at > least be safe for standalone executables? > > And if I'm wanting to use ASan in C++ code that is invoked from an > APK, can I statically

In practice, APT is not faster to build than rdf. The df calculator we use is linear time and quite fast. Updating is also pretty trivial since it's only deletes of dead and unreachable code. So anything it reached can be replaced with undef in most cases. Cd-dce is not slower in GCC than dce On Fri, Jan 29, 2016, 8:31 PM David Callahan <dcallahan at fb.com> wrote: > I think you

> Static runtime will only intercept calls from the main executable, but > not from any libraries. This may work for simple standalone programs, > but you may run into puzzling failures. What type of failures do you mean? Does the symbol mismatch break assumptions in the ASan runtime? It's easy to imagine, for example, ASan missing use-after-free bugs because the call to free() is

Hi, I have a new variant of Aggressive Dead Code Elimination that also removes dead branching. It is designed to minimize the cost of control-dependence analysis in the common case where almost the entire program is live. It also can optionally remove dead but may-be-infinite loops. When enabled for –O3 (replacing current ADCE pass) and removing loops, impact on SPEC2006 is in the noise but it