similar to: Plotting a function that includes logical operators

(earlier I sent it as html by mistake). Hi, How can I get from C an object name used as a function argument? I have sample code in C that gives me access to the name of the function being called: SEXP xname(SEXP x) { const char *fun_name = CHAR(PRINTNAME(CAR(x))); x = CDR(x); const char *arg_name = isNull(TAG(x)) ? "" : CHAR(PRINTNAME(TAG(x)));

v1 -> v2: - Further fixes to Getopt int parsing. - Completed the L/S changes. - Fixed the test suite so it passes now. Also we don't need the special-case tests for 64 bit arch. Rich.

v3 -> v4: - Pushed the first patch upstream since it was ACKed. - Prevent use of M except for the special virt-v2v options. - Sort the options after added --help etc. - Make corresponding fixes to the tests. Rich.

v2 -> v3: - Add M variant and test it. Rich.

Hi all, This is a proposal for supporting keyword arguments to Sizer#add following the thread below : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wxruby-development/2008-March/001244.html After a deeper look at lib/wx/keyword_ctors.rb and lib/wx/keyword_defs.rb, I understood the whole thing :-). I just reused and modified slightly the method args_as_list. The new Sizer#add_item combines the features of add

Hi R-helpers, I have a dataframe (called data) with 100 columns, the columns of which are named with integers ranging from 1900 to 1999. I wish to extract those columns which names are >=1950 and <=1970. I tried: data2<-subset(data,select=(names(data)>=1950 & names(data)<=1970)) but that doesn't work. Any ideas? Thanks! Mark [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Why, in R, does (0.1 + 0.05) > 0.15 evaluate to True? What am I missing here? How can I ensure this (ostensibly incorrect) behavior doesn't introduce bugs into my code? Thanks for your time. Dave Mitchell [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, I have a csv-file which looks like: #### pwt6_r.csv #### code;year;rgdpch AGO;1998;1234 ALB;1998;3576 ARG;1998;#NA SVN;1996;13439 SWE;1996;21492 AGO;1960;#NA ALB;1960;2345 ARG;1960;4634 #### pwt6_r.csv #### To import this file i call: pwt6<-read.csv("d:/pwt6_r.csv",header=T,na.strings="#NA",sep=";") Now I want to generate a new data.frame which include

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1409 Bug ID: 1409 Summary: nft manpage makes confusing reference to logical operators Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

Add a new Getopt module to mllib, to parse command line arguments with handlers close to the ones used with Arg, but using getopt(3) (actually getopt_long_only) to do the real parsing. This allow us to provide options for OCaml tools with a syntax similar to the C tools, and use the additional features getopt offers and Arg does not. Do a single-step conversion of Common_utils and all the OCaml

Dear R-users, I haven?t found rules for logical operators. I need to select data according the following rule: Condition A & (Condition B | Condition C) How should I write it?? Is Condition A & Condition B | Condition C correct or will R execute (Condition A & Condition B) | Condition C ? Thanks for your help. Delphine Fontaine Delphine Fontaine Statistician Statistics

Hi, I’m looking at what the LLVM compilation chain does to optimize the following functions using logical operators. The one using integer type (t1 and t3) are optimized, but not the ones using float type (t2 and t4), even when using -O3 or -Ofast. Why is that ? Thera are those kind of optimizations done in the LLVM source code? Thanks. bool t1(int v1) { return (2 + v1) == 7; } bool

I'm trying to select a subset from character vector using the logical operator >, but get the following error 6356 85 SOL 1 25 1 38E6 6357 85 SOL 1 27 1 38E6 6910 95 SOL 1 25 1 38E6 7152 98 SOL 1 19 1 38E6 7153 98 SOL 1 22 2 38E6 7154 98 SOL 1 28 1 38E6 >

Hi, I have a dataset in which I would like to select rows based on matching conditions and return the maximum value of a variable else return one row if duplicate counts exist. My dataset looks like this: PGID PTID Year Visit Count 6755 53121 2009 1 0 6755 53121 2009 2 0 6755 53121 2009 3 0 6755 53122 2008 1 0 6755 53122 2008 2 0 6755 53122 2008 3 1 6755 53122 2009 1 0 6755 53122 2009 2 1 6755

Hello everyone,           I have a basic question regarding logical operators. > x<-seq(-1,1,by=0.02) > x   [1] -1.00 -0.98 -0.96 -0.94 -0.92 -0.90 -0.88 -0.86 -0.84 -0.82 -0.80 -0.78  [13] -0.76 -0.74 -0.72 -0.70 -0.68 -0.66 -0.64 -0.62 -0.60 -0.58 -0.56 -0.54  [25] -0.52 -0.50 -0.48 -0.46 -0.44 -0.42 -0.40 -0.38 -0.36 -0.34 -0.32 -0.30  [37] -0.28 -0.26 -0.24 -0.22 -0.20 -0.18 -0.16

This patch is incomplete but it illustrates the idea. virt-sysprep is rewritten as a modular tool in OCaml. Only the 'utmp' and 'hostname' operations are implemented at the moment. Rich.

Hi! OS: CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core) Dovecot: 2.2.18 Run user listing - doveadm user '*', single user - work. auth[20540]: segfault at 8 ip 00007fd554340c6b sp 00007ffc17c886e0 error 4 in libauthdb_ldap.so[7fd55433b000+a000] dovecot: auth: Fatal: master: service(auth): child 20540 killed with signal 11 (core dumped) dovecot: auth: Error: net_connect_unix(auth-worker) failed:

R-helpers: If I want to pass a character name of a function TO a function, and then have that function executed, how would I do this? I want an arbitrary version of the following, where any function can be used (e.g. I don't want the if-then statement here): apply_some_function <- function(data,function_name) { if(function_name=="mean") { return(mean(data)) }

libswfdec/swfdec_font.c | 4 libswfdec/swfdec_font.h | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_js_movie.c | 8 - libswfdec/swfdec_script.c | 225 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- libswfdec/swfdec_script.h | 14 ++ test/.gitignore | 1 test/trace/Makefile.am | 6 + test/trace/height4.swf |binary test/trace/height4.swf.trace | 5

Hi, I have a little problem. I'm trying to do the following: Convert _projected_ shapes from a Map object into logical matrices. That is, rasterize a shape into a logical "in-the-shape" and "out-of-the-shape" matrix. What I'm trying to do is get an 'equal-area' estimate of the area of intersection between two overlapping shapes, without any concern about