similar to: glmnet with binary logistic regression

Hi All,  I have been trying to use glmnet package to do LASSO linear regression. my x data is a matrix n_row by n_col and y is a vector of size n_row corresponding to the vector data. The number of n_col is much more larger than the number of n_row. I do the following: fits = glmnet(x, y, family="multinomial")I have been following this

Hello fellow R users, I have been getting a strange error message when using the cv.glmnet function in the glmnet package. I am attempting to fit a multinomial regression using the lasso. covars is a matrix with 80 rows and roughly 4000 columns, all the covariates are binary. resp is an eight level factor. I can fit the model with no errors but when I try to cross-validate after about 30 seconds

Hi, I am trying to do logistic regression for data of 104 patients, which have one outcome (yes or no) and 15 variables (9 categorical factors [yes or no] and 6 continuous variables). Number of yes outcome is 25. Twenty-five events and 15 variables mean events per variable is much less than 10. Therefore, I tried to analyze the data with penalized regression method. I would like please some of the

Dear R users: Recently, I learn to use penalized logistic regression. Two packages (penalized and glmnet) have the function of lasso. So I write these code. However, I got different results of coef. Can someone kindly explain. # lasso using penalized library(penalized) pena.fit2<-penalized(HRLNM,penalized=~CN+NoSus,lambda1=1,model="logistic",standardize=TRUE) pena.fit2

Dear List, I'm running simulations using the glmnet package. I need to use an 'automated' method for model selection at each iteration of the simulation. The cv.glmnet function in the same package is handy for that purpose. However, in my simulation I have p >> N, and in some cases the selected model from cv.glmet is essentially shrinking all coefficients to zero. In this case,

Hi, I am attempting to evaluate the prediction error of a coxph model that was built after feature selection with glmnet. In the preprocessing stage I used na.omit (dataset) to remove NAs. I reconstructed all my factor variables into binary variables with dummies (using model.matrix) I then used glmnet lasso to fit a cox model and select the best performing features. Then I fit a coxph model

Hi, I am trying to do multinomial regression using the glmnet package, but the following gives me an error (for no reason apparent to me): library(glmnet) cv.glmnet(x=matrix(c(1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6), nrow=6),y=as.factor(c(1,2,1,2,3,3)),family='multinomial',alpha=0.5, nfolds=2) The error i get is: Error in if (outlist$msg != "Unknown error") return(outlist) : argument is of

Hi all. Sorry for the long email. I have been trying to find someone local to work on this with me, without much luck. I went in to our local stats consulting service here, and the guy there told me that I already know more about model selection than he does. :-< He pointed me towards another professor that can perhaps help, but that prof is busy until mid-June, so I want to get as much

Hello, I'm trying to select features of cetain numbers(like 100 out of 1000) via LASSO, based on multinomial model, however, it seems the glmnet package provides a very sparse estimation of coefficients(most of coefficients are 0), which selects very few number of variables, like only 10, based on my easy dataset. I try to connect the choice of lambda to the selecting

For what it's worth it looks like spm2 is specifically for *spatial* predictive modeling; presumably its version of CV is doing something spatially aware. I agree that glmnet is old and reliable. One might want to use a tidymodels wrapper to create pipelines where you can more easily switch among predictive algorithms (see the `parsnip` package), but otherwise sticking to glmnet

Hi there, I am trying to use predict() with an object returned by cv.glmnet(), and get the following error: no applicable method for 'predict' applied to an object of class "cv.glmnet" What's wrong? my code: x=matrix(rnorm(100*20),100,20) y=rnorm(100) cv.fit=cv.glmnet(x,y) predict(cv.fit,newx=x[1:5,]) coef(cv.fit) Thanks so much, Asaf -- View this message in context:

Dear R users, if all my numerical variables in my datasets having the same units, may I leave them unnormalized, just do cv.glmnet directly(cv.glmnet(data,standardize=FALSE))? i know normally if there is a mixture of numerical and categorical , one has to standardize the numerical part before applying cv.glmnet with standardize=fase, but that's due to the different units in the numerical

Dear R-experts, I really thank you all a lot for your responses. So, here is the error (and warning) messages at the end of my R code. Many thanks for your help. Error in UseMethod("predict") : ? no applicable method for 'predict' applied to an object of class "c('matrix', 'array', 'double', 'numeric')" > mean(unlist(lst)) [1] NA

?s 20:12 de 23/10/2023, varin sacha via R-help escreveu: > Dear R-experts, > > I really thank you all a lot for your responses. So, here is the error (and warning) messages at the end of my R code. > > Many thanks for your help. > > > Error in UseMethod("predict") : > ? no applicable method for 'predict' applied to an object of class

Hi I'm getting the following warning msg after ?cv.glmnet and I'm wondering what it means... dim(x) 10 12000; dim(y) 10; #two groups case=1 and control=0 cv.glmnet(x, y) Warning message: Option grouped=FALSE enforced in cv.glmnet, since < 3 observations per fold Thanks, .kripa [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

All, For my understanding, I wanted to see if I can get glmnet predictions using both the predict function and also by multiplying coefficients by the variable matrix. This is not worked out. Could anyone suggest where I am going wrong? I understand that I may not have the mean/intercept correct, but the scaling is also off, which suggests a bigger mistake. Thanks for your help. Juliet Hannah

glmnet_1.2 has been uploaded to CRAN. This is a major upgrade, with the following additional features: * poisson family, with dense or sparse x * Cox proportional hazards family, for dense x * wide range of cross-validation features. All models have several criteria for cross-validation. These include deviance, mean absolute error, misclassification error and "auc" for logistic or

glmnet_1.2 has been uploaded to CRAN. This is a major upgrade, with the following additional features: * poisson family, with dense or sparse x * Cox proportional hazards family, for dense x * wide range of cross-validation features. All models have several criteria for cross-validation. These include deviance, mean absolute error, misclassification error and "auc" for logistic or

This update adds an intercept option (by popular request) - now one can fit a model without an intercept Glmnet is a package that fits the regularization path for a number of generalized linear models, with with "elastic net" regularization (tunable mixture of L1 and L2 penalties). Glmnet uses pathwise coordinate descent, and is very fast. The current list of models covered are:

This update adds an intercept option (by popular request) - now one can fit a model without an intercept Glmnet is a package that fits the regularization path for a number of generalized linear models, with with "elastic net" regularization (tunable mixture of L1 and L2 penalties). Glmnet uses pathwise coordinate descent, and is very fast. The current list of models covered are: