similar to: notation question

In a classical meta analysis model y_i = X_i * beta_i + e_i, data {y_i} are assumed to be independent effect sizes. However, I'm encountering the following two scenarios: (1) Each source has multiple effect sizes, thus {y_i} are not fully independent with each other. (2) Each source has multiple effect sizes, each of the effect size from a source can be categorized as one of a factor levels

Assume that we collect below data : - subjects = 20 males + 20 females, every single individual is independence, and difference events = 1, 2, 3... n covariates = 4 blood types A, B, AB, O http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4245397/CodeCogsEqn.jpeg ?m = hazards rates for male ?n = hazards rates for female Wm = Wn x ?, frailty for males, where ? is the edge ratio of male compare to female Wn =

I am trying to fit a linear mixed model of the form y_ij = X_ij \beta + delta_i + e_ij where e_ij ~N(0,s^2_ij) with s_ij known and delta_i~N(0,tau^2) I looked at the ecme routine in package:pan, but this routine does not allow for different Vi (variance covariance matrix of the e_i vector) matrices for each cluster. Is there an easy way to fit this model in R or should I bite the bullet and

Dear R users, I am trying to fit the following ANCOVA model in R2.4.0 Y_ij=mu+alpha_i+beta*(X_ij-X..)+epsilon_ij Particularly I am interested in obtaining estimates for mu, and the effects alpha_i I have this data (from the book Applied Linear Statistical Models by Neter et al (1996), page 1020) y<-c(38,43,24,39,38,32,36,38,31,45,27,21,33,34,28)

This is really a statistical issue. What do you think the Intercept term represents? See ?contrasts. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Marc Girondot via R-help < r-help at

Dear R-er, I try to get the standard error of fitted parameters for factors with a glm, even the reference one: a <- runif(100) b <- sample(x=c("0", "1", "2"), size=100, replace = TRUE) df <- data.frame(A=a, B=b, stringsAsFactors = FALSE) g <- glm(a ~ b, data=df) summary(g)$coefficients # I don't get SE for the reference factor, here 0:

Dear all, Given a LME model (following the notation of Pinheiro and Bates 2000) y_i = X_i*beta + Z_i*b_i + e_i, is it possible to extract the variance-covariance matrix for the estimated beta_i hat and b_i hat from the lme fitted object? The reason for needing this is because I want to have interval prediction on the predicted values (at level = 0:1). The "predict.lme" seems to

I want to maximize a conditional likelihood function that is basically logistic conditional on the number of successes within strata. What would be a good starting place for this? A complication is that the denominator includes a term that is the sum over all permutations. Although there is no time dimension to the problem, it's possible a degenerate use of the Cox proportional hazards

Dear R users, I'm running a SVR in package e1071 but I did not able to calculate the parameters w and b of the regression. I don't know how to do that and if it is possible to do it with this package. Someone have some idea. Any help would be much appreciated. Marlene [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear Sir/Madam, I apologize for any cross-posting. I got a simple question, which I thought the R list may help me to find an answer. Suppose we have Y_1, Y_2, ., Y_n ~ Poisson (Lambda_i) and Lambda_i ~Gamma(alpha_i, beta_i). Empirical Bayes Estimator for hyper-parameters of the gamma distr, i.e. (alpha_t, beta_t) are needed. y=c(12,5,17,14) n=4 What about a Hierarchal B ayes

I want to estimate the following fixed effect model: y_i,t = alpha_i + beta_1 x1_t + beta_2 x2_i,tx2_i,t = gamma_i + gamma_1 x1_t + gamma_2 Z1_i + gamma_3 Z2_i I can use ivreg from AER to do the iv regression. fm <- ivreg(y_i,t ~ x1_t + x2_i,t | x1_t + Z1_i + Z2_i, data = DataSet) But, I'm not sure how can I add the fixed effects. Thanks! [[alternative HTML

I am using the package nlme to fit a simple random effects (variance components model) with 3 parameters: overall mean (fixed effect), between subject variance (random) and within subject variance (random). I have 16 subjects with 1-4 obs per subject. I need a 3x3 variance-covariance matrix that includes all 3 parameters in order to compute the variance of a specific linear

Dear all, I try to conduct a SEM / two stage least squares regression with the following equations: First: X ~ IV1 + IV2 * Y Second: Y ~ a + b X therein, IV1 and IV2 are the two instruments I would like to use. the structure I would like to maintain as the model is derived from economic theory. My problem here is that I have trouble solving the equations to get the reduced form so I can run

hello. I have a question on the interpretation of a logistic model. is it helpful to exponentiate the coefficients (estimates)? I think I once read something about that, but I cannot remember where. if so, how would be the interpretation of the exp(estimate) ? would there be a change of the interpretation of the ANOVA table (or is the ANOVA table not really helpful at all?). thanks for your

Hi the list, According to what I know, the Canberra distance between X et Y is : sum[ (|x_i - y_i|) / (|x_i|+|y_i|) ] (with | | denoting the function 'absolute value') In the source code of the canberra distance in the file distance.c, we find : sum = fabs(x[i1] + x[i2]); diff = fabs(x[i1] - x[i2]); dev = diff/sum; which correspond to the formula : sum[ (|x_i - y_i|) /

Hi Folks, I am dealing with data which have been presented as at each x_i, mean m_i of the y-values at x_i, sd s_i of the y-values at x_i number n_i of the y-values at x_i and I want to linearly regress y on x. There does not seem to be an option to 'lm' which can deal with such data directly, though the regression problem could be algebraically

I am trying to test out several mgcv::gam models in a scalar-on-function regression analysis. The following is the 'hierarchy' of models I would like to test: (1) Y_i = a + integral[ X_i(t)*Beta(t) dt ] (2) Y_i = a + integral[ F{X_i(t)}*Beta(t) dt ] (3) Y_i = a + integral[ F{X_i(t),t} dt ] equivalents for discrete data might be: 1) Y_i = a + sum_t[ L_t * X_it * Beta_t ] (2) Y_i

Greetings. For R gurus this may be a no brainer, but I could not find pointers to efficient computation of this beast in past help files. Background - I wish to implement a Cramer-von Mises type test statistic which involves double sums of max(X_i,Y_j) where X and Y are vectors of differing length. I am currently using ifelse pointwise in a vector, but have a nagging suspicion that there is a

Canberra distance is defined in function `dist' (standard library `mva') as sum(|x_i - y_i| / |x_i + y_i|) Obviously this is undefined for cases where both x_i and y_i are zeros. Since double zeros are common in many data sets, this is a nuisance. In our field (from which the distance is coming), it is customary to remove double zeros: contribution to distance is zero when both x_i

Canberra distance is defined in function `dist' (standard library `mva') as sum(|x_i - y_i| / |x_i + y_i|) Obviously this is undefined for cases where both x_i and y_i are zeros. Since double zeros are common in many data sets, this is a nuisance. In our field (from which the distance is coming), it is customary to remove double zeros: contribution to distance is zero when both x_i