similar to: help with interpreting what nnet() output gives:

Hi, i want to parse a XML-File. I made some Tutorial but with my special Format it don't work. An Example of my format: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> <mzML xmlns="http://psi.hupo.org/ms/mzml" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://psi.hupo.org/ms/mzml

Hello. My name is Akashah. i work at metabolic laboratory. From my study, i found that volcano plot can help a lot in my section.  i already studied about the volcano plot and get the coding to run in R software, unfortunately, there is may be something wrong with the coding. This is because  no graph appear, but no error (blue color text) was shown on the R console. Below is the coding for

HELLO, anybody... could you help me to check the below coding for volcano. what is the mistake? what the plot could not display? # volcano_plot.r # # Author: Amsha Nahid, Jairus Bowne, Gerard Murray # Purpose: Produces a volcano plot # # Input: Data matrix as specified in Data-matrix-format.pdf # Output: Plots log2(fold change) vs log10(t-test P-value) # #

Dear folks (or Dear Professor Bates), I'm quite confused as to the current status of some of the available functions applicable to lmer objects. Following the examples in Baayen, Davidson, Bates (2006), my plan is to run mcmcsamp on a random effect model created by lmer in package lme4, then use the (perhaps outdated) pvals to estimate p-value. But then I couldn't find pvals anywhere.

Dear R list, I have a recurring problem with the languageR package, specifically the aovlmer.fnc function. When I try to run the following code (from R. H. Baayen's textbook): # Example 1: library(languageR) latinsquare.lmer <- lmer(RT ~ SOA + (1 | Word) + (1 | Subject), data = latinsquare) x <- pvals.fnc(latinsquare.lmer,

Hi everybody! I was using the function pvals.fnc from package 'languageR' until April. I do not know which version. Yesterday I updated all my packages and tried to run my loop again. Now I get the following error message: error in pvals.fnc(mm, nsim = 1000) : MCMC sampling is not yet implemented in lme4_0.999375-27 for models with random correlation parameters I guess it?s because of

Hello, I am using fdrtool(x, statistic="pvalue") where x is a vector of chisq p-values. I can get this command to work with some x, but not with others. When it does NOT work, I get the following screen output: > fdrtool(pvals$Chi2.pval, statistic="pvalue") Step 1... determine cutoff point Step 2... estimate parameters of null distribution and eta0 Step 3... compute p-values

Dear R-help: I've been trying to run pvals.fnc in the newest version of R (2.13.0). The function lmer worked fine, but when I tried to use pvals.fnc on the lmer object, I got the following error: "Error in pvals.fnc(elogr.subj.dys.sum.3x3.p, nsim = 10000) : trying to get slot "coefs" from an object (class "summaryDefault") that is not an S4 object." How can I

Hi Everyone, I am using R 2.10.1. lmer function works properly, however pvals.fnc () does not despite the fact that I uploaded: - library(lme4) - library(coda) - library(languageR) This is the error message I get pvals.fnc(lexdec3.lmerE2, nsim=10000)$fixed Error in pvals.fnc(lexdec3.lmerE2, nsim = 10000) : MCMC sampling is not yet implemented in lme4_0.999375 for models with random

Dear R experts, I was just wondering why R is not picking up the order that I am putting in. Total ordering is the first argument of the sinDAG function from the package 'SIN'. Description of sinDAG This function computes the matrix of simultaneous p-values for SIN model selection for acyclic directed graphs (DAGs). SIN assumes that a total ordering of the variables is available (e.g.,

Hi. I get an error message about not converging when I try and use the pvals.fnc from the languageR library. The LMER analysis worked fine (See below). I am not an expert so I don't understand why the LMER worked but not the pvals.fnc Any help gratefully received. - Mike AIC BIC logLik MLdeviance REMLdeviance -7324 -7254 3673 -7451 -7346 Random effects: Groups

library(lme4) library(coda) library(languageR) fit = lmer(Reaction~Days + (1|Subject) + (0+Days|Subject), data=sleepstudy) pvals.fnc(fit)$random # compare with... samp = mcmcsamp(fit, n=10000, trans=FALSE) HPDinterval(samp) densityplot(samp, plot=F) # 'pvals.fnc' reports sigma instead of sigma^2, but it looks like the # Sbjc.(In) and Sbjc.Days are also sqrt compared with the

Hi all, I'm analyzing micro array data.. it has produced a file (to be specific matrix) withdimension of 35556 2. first few lines of the matrix are as below.. probe_name control.fdr.pvals.present 10338001 0.000440001 10338002 0.000583093 10338003 0.000528449 10338004 0.000610362 10338005 0.000151825 10338006 0.0001733 10338007 0.000152924 Now, i want only rows whose

Dear R-developeRs, Attached follows a patch against svn 34959 that adds the printing of p-values to the TukeyHSD.aov function in stats package. I also updated the corresponding documentation file and added a 'see also' reference to the simint function of the multcomp package. As it was already brought up in a previous thread [1] in R-help, one can obtain the adjusted

Hi All, I am trying to plot outlier loci in R from data generated by BayesFst. The developers provide the code which I use but I can't seem to get it to work consistently. Sometimes I can get R to generate a plot (without confidence intervals or loci IDs) and other times I cannot even generate P-values using the code supplied. I am wondering if any one has used R to plot the BayesFst

Hi,   I am trying to use the lmer function from the lme4 package in R 2.8.0. to fit a generalized mixed-effects model for a dependent variable with a binomial distribution (for more info on my experiment, look below). However, I encounter a major problem: How is it possible to find the general test statistic and see the relative importance of the predictors? The methods which I found described in

In a GLMM, one compares the conditional model including covariates with the unconditional model to see whether the conditional model fits the data better. (1) For my unconditional model, a different random effects term fits better (independent random effects) than for my conditional model (correlated random effects). Is this very uncommon, and how can this be explained? Can I compare these models

Hi, I would like to derive p-values for pair-wise comparison (Tukey's) of effects when the response is a count. I am trying a test case where y ~ Po( lambda(x) ). x has three levels : A, B and C with lambda(x) = 10, 20 and 20 respectively. Hence, p-values for the contrast C - B should distribute uniformally. I have implemented this test case as below but do not get uniform

Hola Manuel lo he tratado de hacer pero me sale Error: unexpected string constante in: "anova(a,as,test=Chisq") no tengo ni idea de por qué... Me resulta alucinante no poder contar ya con pvals.fnc. ¿Será imposible hacerse con ello? Saludos, Miguel -------------------------------------------- El vie, 13/6/14, Manuel Azcárate <mazcarategarcia en gmail.com> escribió:

Dear useRs, I was searching CRAN for implementation of kurtosis and skewness tests, and found that there is some kind of lack on it. So, I have written three functions: 1. Anscombe-Glynn test for kurtosis 2. Bonett-Seier test based on Geary's kurtosis (which is not widely known, but I was inspired by original paper describing it, found coincidentally in Elsevier database) 3.