similar to: Generate the next column from previous column

Yesterday I posted the following question (my apologies for not putting a subject line): =================question====================== Hello -- I would like to know of a more efficient way of writing the following piece of code. Thanks. options(stringsAsFactors=FALSE) orig <- c(rep('11111111',100000),rep('22222222',200000),rep('33333333'

Hi, I'm trying to set a rule to dial out through multiple Zap groups so that, say, g0 is the cheaper POTS lines group and must be used first. However, if g0 is busy or disconnected then try dialing out g1. My g0 group is made up of 4 analog lines connected to a 4-FXO card. I disconnected the RJ-11 wires from the FXO card to simulate a line disconnection. So theoretically all calls should

Hello list, I'm experimenting with a little GlusterFS cluster on debian wheezy: === snip === muzzy:~# cat /etc/debian_version wheezy/sid muzzy:~# dpkg -l | grep gluster ii glusterfs-client 3.2.6-1 clustered file-system (client package) ii glusterfs-common 3.2.6-1 GlusterFS common libraries and translator modules ii glusterfs-server 3.2.6-1 clustered file-system (server package) === snip

Hi Rafael, Yes, merging gv prevents linker to do garbage collection. Should it be implemented as a peephole pass? If we do it too early, the distance between GVs are not fixed yet. PS: Below is the GCC output with "extern" hidden: ldr r2, .L2 stmfd sp!, {r3, lr} .save {r3, lr} .LPIC0: add r0, pc, r2 bl _Z4initPv(PLT) ldr r1, .L2+4 .LPIC1: add r0, pc, r1 bl _Z4initPv(PLT) ldr

Yesterday I posted the following question (my apologies for not putting a subject line): =================question====================== Hello -- I would like to know of a more efficient way of writing the following piece of code. Thanks. options(stringsAsFactors=FALSE) orig <- c(rep('11111111',100000),rep('22222222',200000),rep('33333333'

Hi, I have a column (V4) in a midi event list which includes tone pitch names, i.e. "A4, E4, C#4, A3...": > compo[1:10,] V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 1 1 1 0 A4 96 2 0 2 1 1 0 E4 96 2 0 3 1 1 0 C#4 96 2 0 4 1 1 0 A3 96 2 0 5 1 3 0 B4 96 1 0 6 1 3 0 E4 96 1 0 7 1 3 0 B3 96 1 0 8 1 3 0 G#3 96 1 0 9 1 4 0 C#5 96 1 0 10

>> Any thoughs? > > I'm now struggling to see how GCC justifies it. What if a different > translation-unit declared those variables in a different order? I also > can't get the same behaviour here, do you have a more complete > command-line? Ah, I see; the translation-unit that does the optimisation needs to have them as a definition (i.e. "= {0}") rather

dear professor: thank you for your help,witn your help i develop the nomogram successfully. after that i want to do the internal validation to the model.i ues the bootpred to do it,and then i encounter problem again,just like that.(´íÎóÓÚerror to :complete.cases(x, y, wt) : ²»ÊÇËùÓеIJÎÊý¶¼Ò»Ñù³¤(the length of the augment was different)) i hope you tell me where is the mistake,and maybe i have

Dear R-helpers, I am using confint() within a function, and I want to turn off the message it prints: x <- rnorm(100) y <- x^1.1+rnorm(100) nlsfit <- nls(y ~ g0*x^g1, start=list(g0=1,g1=1)) > confint(nlsfit) Waiting for profiling to be done... 2.5% 97.5% g0 0.4484198 1.143761 g1 1.0380479 2.370057 I cannot find any way to turn off 'Waiting for. .." I tried

[Please keep r-help in the cc: list] I don't quite know how to interpret the difference between specifying effort as an offset vs. as weights; I would have to spend more time thinking about it/working through it than I have available at the moment. I don't know that specifying effort as weights is *wrong*, but I don't know that it's right or what it is doing: if I were

dear professor: I have a problem about the nomogram.I have got the result through analysing the dataset "exp2.sav" through multinominal logistic regression by SPSS 17.0. and I want to deveop the nomogram through R-Projject,just like this : > n<-100 > set.seed(10) > T.Grade<-factor(0:3,labels=c("G0", "G1", "G2","G3")) >

Hey all, I have a situation where I have 8 lines from the phone company in a hunt group coming in to my asterisk box. These are the same lines I'm using for outgoing calls ( named g0 ). The problem arises when someone dials our number at the same time asterisk tries to put a call out on one of the zap channels in the g0 group. This has happened twice that I know of so far, once to

Hi, all: Recently I am debugging the DSA and want to learn how it work, and now I am checking the local datastructure analysis. I use the following command to print the graph: (gdb) p g.dump() digraph DataStructures { label="Function addG"; Node0xe1f3a0 [shape=record,shape=Mrecord,label="{ i32: MRE\n|{<g0>}}"]; Node0xe1f4d0

I?m trying to run a logistic joinpoint regression utilising the ljr package. I?ve been using the forward selection technique to get the number of knots for the analysis, but I?m uncertain as to my results and the interpretation. The documentation is rather brief ( in the package and the stats in medicine article is quite technical) and without any good examples. At the moment I?m thinking 1)find

dear professor: I am a doctor of urinary,and I am developing a nomogram of bladder tumor.Now I have a problem about this. I have got the result like this through analysing the dataset "exp11.sav" through multinominal logistic regression by SPSS 17.0.(the Sig. is high,that is good ,it is just aexperimental data ) Parameter Estimates Ya B Std. Error Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95%

Dear Tianwei, You can use the -analyze option to the opt tool to tell the DSA passes to store their results in files. When you use the -analyze option, the DSA passes will create a separate file for each function (and possible one file to hold the globals graph). For this reason, I recommend running opt in a special empty directory because DSA will generate *a lot* of files. Second, to

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:59 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Dear Tianwei, > > You can use the -analyze option to the opt tool to tell the DSA passes > to store their results in files. When you use the -analyze option, the > DSA passes will create a separate file for each function (and possible > one file to hold the globals graph). For this reason,

Hi, Is there a way to create trunk groups while asterisk is running. For exemple let's say that zapata.conf defines g0 as channels 1-23 I would like (while asterisk is running) define g1 as 1-10 and g1 as 10-23 Any hints appreciated. Andre Courchesne

Dear useRs, I have a question with respect to fitting a non-linearity using gam (mgcv package, version 1.7-16). In a study I'm currently conducting, I'd like to find out if there is a breakpoint after which the effect of Age of Acquisition (AOA) of the second language changes. I.e. if the slope of AOA before the breakpoint (at a certain AOA) is different from the slope past the

Dear LLVM, I was wondering if this is the right way to get TopDown DSGraph? TDDataStructures &TD = getAnalysis<TDDataStructures>(); F is some function DSGraph &dsg = TD.getDSGraph(F); I found out the DSGraph I got using this method is actually bottom up DSGraph, can you let me know why? Thanks, xiaodong