similar to: AUC calculated from Epi package

I am using the rcorr.cens function from the Hmisc package and the time-dependent ROC curve obtained using tdrocc in the survcomp package. I understand that the C statistic from rcorr.cens has to be subtracted from 1 if high values of the risk variable lower survival. Given that I wonder what the connection is between that C statistic and the AUC from the tdrocc object. If they are substantially

The name conflicts in Epi and ROC packages (2 'ROC' functions are the problem) cause the following code to work once, but not twice: library(MASS); data(cats); x = cats[,2] y = ifelse(cats[,1]=='F',0,1) library(Epi); ROC(x,y,grid=0)$AUC library(ROC); AUC(rocdemo.sca(y, x, dxrule.sca)) What is the standard way of resolving name conflicts? Ask maintainers to resolve

Hi, I was lately debugging parts of my 'colAUC' function in caTools package, and in a process looked into other packages for calculating Areas Under ROC Curves (AUC). To my surprise I found at least 6 other functions: * wilcox.test * AUC from ROC package, * performance from ROCR package, * auROC from limma package, * ROC from Epi package, * roc.area from verification

Dear R-philes, I am plotting ROC curves for several cross-validation runs of a classifier (using the function below). In addition to the average AUC, I am interested in obtaining a confidence interval for the average AUC. Is there a straightforward way to do this via the ROCR package? plot_roc_curve <- function(roc.dat, plt.title) { #print(str(vowel.ROC)) pred <-

Dear List, I am trying to assess the prediction accuracy of an ordinal model fit with LRM in the Design package. I used predict.lrm to predict on an independent dataset and am now attempting to assess the accuracy of these predictions. >From what I have read, the AUC is good for this because it is threshold independent. I obtained the AUC for the fit model output from the c score (c =

Hi all, does anyone know why the area under the curve (AUC) is negative? I'm using ROC function with a logistic regression, package Epi. First time it happens... Thanks a lot! Bruno -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/ROC-Curve-negative-AUC-tp4650469.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi, I need to apply the Partial AUC in ROC curves. How I do this?. And I need the SE of partial AUC too. I have been reading ?caTool, ?Epi, ?verification, ?ROC, ?ROCR, ?genefilter and more. I only see the partial AUC, but I do not the SE. Thank you, if you can help me. Xavier G. Ordo?ez Doctoral Student

Hi, I'm trying to calculate 95% confidence interval of C statistic of logistic regression model using rcorr.cens in rms package. I wrote a brief function for this purpose as the followings; CstatisticCI <- function(x) # x is object of rcorr.cens. { se <- x["S.D."]/sqrt(x["n"]) Low95 <- x["C Index"] - 1.96*se Upper95 <- x["C

Hi, there: Could someone tell me a simple function of plot ROC curve and calculate AUC in R? My setting is very simple, a column of the true binary response and another column of predicted probabilities. Thanks! Yulei [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear all, I would like to calculate the optimal cut off (threshold) of a test using the Epi package. Here I am presenting some data based on the output of two tests. I am interested in identifying the optimal cut off and its 95% CI. Running the ROC() function with the Epi package I obtain a nice picture that returns what I interpret as the optimal cut off with lr.eta=0.491. would be this the

Dear all, I would like to calculate the optimal cut off (threshold) of a test using the Epi package. Here I am presenting some data based on the output of two tests. I am interested in identifying the optimal cut off an its 95% CI. Running the ROC() function with the Epi package I obtain a nice picture that returns what I interpret as the optimal cut off with lr.eta=0.431. would be this the

Hi, I would like to compare differences in AUC from 2 different models, glm and gam for predicting presence / absence. I know that in theory the model with a higher AUC is better, but what I am interested in is if statistically the increase in AUC from the glm model to the gam model is significant. I also read quite extensive discussions on the list about ROC and AUC but I still didn't find

Hi R-users, I'm having some problems in using the Hmisc package. I'm estimating a cox ph model and want to test whether the drop in concordance index due to omitting one covariate is significant. I think (but I'm not sure) here are two ways to do that: 1) predict two cox model (the full model and model without the covariate of interest) and estimate the concordance index (i.e. area

Hello, I am making some use of ROC curve analysis. I find much help on the mailing list, and I have used the Area Under the Curve (AUC) functions from the ROC function in the bioconductor project... http://www.bioconductor.org/repository/release1.5/package/Source/ ROC_1.0.13.tar.gz However, I read here... http://www.medcalc.be/manual/mpage06-13b.php "The 95% confidence interval for

I am doing a simulation with a relatively large data set (20,000 observations) for which I want to calculate the area under the Receiver Operator Curve (AUC) for many parameter combinations. I am using the ROC library and the following commands to generate each AUC: rocobj=rocdemo.sca(truth = ymis, data = model$fitted.values, rule = dxrule.sca) #generation of observed ROC object

I know how to compute the ROC curve and the empirical AUC from the logistic regression after fitting the model. But here is my question, how can I compute the standard error for the AUC estimator resulting form logistic regression? The variance should be more complicated than AUC based on known test results. Does anybody know a reference on this problem? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear all, I want to measure the goodness of prediction of my linear model. That's why I was thinking about the area under roc curve. I'm trying the following, but I don't know how to avoid the error. Any help would be appreciated. library(ROCR) model.lm <- lm(log(outcome)~log(v1)+log(v2)+factor1) pred<-predict(model.lm) pred<-prediction(as.numeric(pred),

Hello, I would like to use the ROCR package to draw ROC curves and compute AUC values. However, in the specific context of my application, the true positive rates and false positive rates are already provided by some upstream method. Of course, I can draw a ROC plot with the following command : plot(x=FPrate, y=TPrate, "o", xlab="false positive rate", ylab="true

Hi, I am quite new to R and I have two questions regarding ROCR. 1. I have tried to understand how to extract area-under-curve value by looking at the ROCR document and googling. Still I am not sure if I am doing the right thing. Here is my code, is "auc1" the auc value? " pred1 <- prediction(resp1,label1) perf1 <- performance(pred1,"tpr","fpr") plot(

Hallo! Does anybody know a way to calculate the sample size for comparing AUC of ROC curves against 'by chance' with AUC=0.5 (and/or against anothe AUC)? Thanks! Karl