similar to: for loop and linear models

Hi I would like to shorten mod1 <- nls(ColName2 ~ ColName1, data = table, ...) mod2 <- nls(ColName3 ~ ColName1, data = table, ...) mod3 <- nls(ColName4 ~ ColName1, data = table, ...) ... is there something like cols = c(ColName2,ColName3,ColName4,...) for i in ... mod[i-1] <- nls(ColName[i] ~ ColName1, data = table, ...) I am looking forward to help Christof

Folks, I am trying to get a loop to run which increments the object name as part of the loop. Here "fit1" "fit2" "fit3" and "fit4" are linear regression models that I have created. > for (ii in c(1:4)){ + SSE[ii]=rbind(anova(fit[ii])$"Sum Sq") + dfe[ii]=rbind(summary(fit[ii])$df) + } Error in anova(fit[ii]) : object 'fit' not found

Hi, I've a data frame like this: > as.data.frame(cbind(rnorm(1:12),rnorm(1:12))) V1 V2 1 -1.30849402 -0.52094136 2 0.96157302 0.76217871 3 -0.44223351 -1.72630871 4 -0.10432438 -1.04732942 5 -1.38748914 0.95877311 6 -0.63965975 0.65494811 7 -0.24058318 0.19496830 8 -0.11172988 1.01680655 9 0.08065333 0.22168589 10 0.25196536 0.84619914 11

Hi all, I have a data set that looks a bit like this. feed1 RFU Site Vial Time lnRFU 1 44448 1 1 10 10.702075 2 47521 1 1 20 10.768927 3 42905 1 1 30 10.66674 4 46867 1 1 40 10.755069 5 42995 1 1 50 10.668839 6 43074 1 1 60 10.670675 7 41195 1 1 70 10.626072 8 47090 1 2 10 10.759816 9 48100 1

Hi there, I ran the following code: vols=read.csv(file="C:/Documents and Settings/Hugh/My Documents/PhD/Swaption vols.csv" , header=TRUE, sep=",") X<-ts(vols[,2]) #X dcOU<-function(x,t,x0,theta,log=FALSE){ Ex<-theta[1]/theta[2]+(x0-theta[1]/theta[2])*exp(-theta[2]*t) Vx<-theta[3]^2*(1-exp(-2*theta[2]*t))/(2*theta[2]) dnorm(x,mean=Ex,sd=sqrt(Vx),log=log) }

hey, folks, I have two very simple questions. I am not quite sure if I can do this using R. so, I am analyzing a large data frame with thousands of variables. For example: Dependent variables: d1, d2, d3 (i.e., there are three dependent variables) Independent variables: s1, s2, s3, ......s1000 (i.e., there are 1000 independent variables) now I want to run simple linear regression analyses of

I have a list of dataframes i.e. each list element is a dataframe with three columns and differing number of rows. The third column takes on only two values. I wish to split the list into two sublists based on the value of the third column of the list element.  Second issue with lists as well. I would like to reduce each of the sublist based on the range of the second column, i.e. if the range of

Hi all, I have the next problem: I have a matrix with size 8,000,000x18. My personal computer...blocks...so I have cut my original file into 100 different file. I have written a function that should be run on each of this file. So imagine I need to read data from q1 to q100 file data<-read.table("q1.txt",sep="") and each time I read 1 file execute my personal function

Hi group, I imported 16 data frames using the function "list.files" temp <- list.files(path="...........") myfiles = lapply(temp, read.table,sep = "") Now I have 16 data set imported in R window. I want to combine them by row and tried some thing like (Here I am considering only 20 columns) for(i in 1:16){ data<- cbind(myfiles[[i]][,1:20]) } but it

I am estimating a large model by groups. How do you save the results and?returns the associated quantiles? For this example I need a data frame n?? ?xi??????? mu????????beta 1?? 0.1033614? 2.5389580 0.9092611 2? ?0.3401922? 0.5192882 1.5290615 3?? 0.5130798? 0.5668308 1.2105666 I also want to apply gevrlevelPlot() for each "n" or group. ? #Example n <- c(1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2,

Dear all, I have 9 data frames, and I'm simply trying to sum the values of column 3 (on a row-by-row basis). However, there are a slightly different number of rows in each data frame, so I'm receiving the following error: "Error in Ops.data.frame(mrunoff_207101[3], mrunoff_207102[3]) : ? + only defined for equally-sized data frames". Here is what I'm attempting to do:

Hi, I have been examining large data and need to do simple linear regression with the data which is grouped based on the values of a particular attribute. For instance, consider three columns : ID, x, y, and I need to regress x on y for each distinct value of ID. Specifically, for the set of data corresponding to each of the 4 values of ID (76,111,121,168) in the below data, I should invoke

Hello, I am using the following script to run an anova for numerous species in a table that I have: SiteSpp <-

I'm having a hard time figuring out how to group results by certain factors in R. I have data with the following headings: [1] "Time" "Plot" "LatCat" "Elevation" "ElevCat" "Aspect" "AspCat" "Slope" [9] "SlopeCat" "Species" "SizeClass" "Stems" and

I realize this should be simple, but even after reading over the several help pages several times, I still cannot decide between the myriad "apply" functions to address it. I simply want to apply a function to all the rows (or columns) of the same index from two (or more) identically sized arrays (or data frames). For example: > a=matrix(1:50,nrow=10) >

Hi all, I need to run several simple linear regressions at once, using the following data. Response variables: Bird species (sp 1, sp2, sp3...spn). Independent variable: Natprop - proportion of natural area. covarate: Effort = hours). One single linear regression would be: lmSp1 <- lm(sp1~ natprop + effort). However, I need to run this linear regression for all bird species that I have

Hi all, After trial and error by myself for a few hours, I decide to ask for your help. I have a training set which is a matrix of size 200 x 2, where the two columns denote each independent variable. I have 200 observations. ----------------- ss=data.frame(trainingSet); result=lm(trainingClass~ss$X1+ss$X2); ----------------- where trainingClass denotes the true classes of the training data.

All: How do I obtain one step ahead out-of-sample forecasts from a model using "dyn" or "dynlm" ? Thanks! Best, John [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear all, i am doing linear regression with robust error to know the effect of a (x) variable on (y)other if i execute the command i found positive trend. But if i check the effect of number of (x.x1,x2,x3)variables on same (y)variable then the positive effect shwon by x variable turns to negative. so plz help me in this situation. Barjesh Kochar Research scholar

Hi, I was wondering why the results from lm and dynlm are not the same for what I think is the same model. I have just modified example 4.2 from the Pfaff book, please see below for the code and results. Can anyone tell my what I am doing wrongly? Many thanks, Werner set.seed(123456) e1 <- rnorm(100) e2 <- rnorm(100) y1 <- ts(cumsum(e1)) y2 <- ts(0.6*y1 + e2) lr.reg <- lm(y2