Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "dynlm question"
2011 Jun 21
1
dynlm
Dear All,
I'm trying to use dynlm to fit a time series.
I have 3 seasonal terms. Here is an example of the problem.
This is my time variable, hourly data:
timeSeries <- seq(as.POSIXct("2011-01-01 00:00:00"), as.POSIXct("2011-12-31 23:00:00"), by="hour")
My response
is:
y <- rnorm(length(t), 1000, 500)
There are 3 seasonal factors:
t.h <-
2011 May 14
2
changing the day of the week in dates format
Dear all,
I have a question related to the POSIXlt function in R.
I have a set of dates and times, for exmaple:
startx <- as.POSIXct("2011-01-01 00:00:00")
finx <- as.POSIXct("2011-12-31 00:00:00")
daysx<- seq(startx, finx, by="24 hours")
I
want to change the dates of all the days falling on a Saturday to the
next working day (i.e. Monday). So I
2009 Feb 27
0
POSIXlt, POSIXct, strptime, GMT and 1969-12-31 23:59:59
R-devel:
Some very inconsistent behavior, that I can't seem to find documented.
Sys.setenv(TZ="GMT")
str(unclass(strptime("1969-12-31 23:59:59","%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")))
List of 9
$ sec : num 59
$ min : int 59
$ hour : int 23
$ mday : int 31
$ mon : int 11
$ year : int 69
$ wday : int 3
$ yday : int 364
$ isdst: int 0
- attr(*, "tzone")= chr
2008 Jan 28
0
dynlm: new version 0.2-0
Dear useRs,
I've release a new version of the "dynlm" package to CRAN which adds two
new features:
o instrumental variables regression (two-stage least squares) via
formulas like
dynlm(y ~ x1 + x2 | z1 + z2 + z3, data = mydata)
where z1, z2, z3 are the instruments which can again contain
lags/differences/season via the d()/L()/season() operators.
o
2008 Sep 09
1
'xtfrm' performance (influences 'order' performance) in R devel
Hello everybody,
it looks like the presense of some (do know know which) S4 methods for a
given S4 class degrades the performance of xtfrm (used in 'order' in new
R-devel) by a factor of millions. This is for classes that ARE derived
from numeric directly and thus should be quite trivial to convert to
numeric.
Consider the following example:
setClass("TimeDateBase",
2020 Oct 02
0
timezone tests and R-devel
Thank you for the report. In R-devel, all.equal.POSIXt() by default
reports inconsistent time zones. Previously,
> x <- Sys.time()
> all.equal(x, as.POSIXlt(x, tz = "EST5EDT"))
would return TRUE. To ignore the time zone attributes in R-devel, the
argument 'check.tzone = FALSE' needs to be used.
That said, I can reproduce the 'make check' failure in R-devel on
2005 Apr 28
0
new package: dynlm 0.1-0
Dear useRs,
recently, there were several discussions on R-help about how to
conveniently fit dynamic linear models and time series regressions. The
package dynlm tries to address this problem by 1. providing some more
functions like lags L() and differences d() and season() in the formula
specification of a model and 2. preserving the time series attributes of
the data.
A first version of the
2005 Apr 28
0
new package: dynlm 0.1-0
Dear useRs,
recently, there were several discussions on R-help about how to
conveniently fit dynamic linear models and time series regressions. The
package dynlm tries to address this problem by 1. providing some more
functions like lags L() and differences d() and season() in the formula
specification of a model and 2. preserving the time series attributes of
the data.
A first version of the
Suggestions for improvement as regards `as` methods, and a call for consistency in `as.Date` methods
2016 Jan 27
0
Suggestions for improvement as regards `as` methods, and a call for consistency in `as.Date` methods
Good evening all,
This topic is gone into at a bit more length at my related Stack Overflow
question here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34647674/why-do-as-methods-remove-vector-names-and-is-there-a-way-around-it
There are two lingering issues despite the abundant insight received at SO,
namely:
1) _Why_ do as methods remove their arguments' names attribute?
This is a fact which is
2020 Oct 23
0
timezone tests and R-devel
So let me try to raise this issue once more, and perhaps be more clear
about what I think the issue is..
In my opinion there is now a bug in
make check
in R-development (tested today with r79361). As I see it, I specify a
reasonable TZ environment variable and this leads to make check emitting an
error.
Best,
Kasper
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 11:28 AM Kasper Daniel Hansen <
kasperdanielhansen
2007 Dec 11
0
holidayNYSE missing some
John Putz wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> */
> email: /**/johnputz3655@yahoo.com/* <mailto:johnputz3655@yahoo.com>
> */home: 206-632-6522
> cell: 206-910-5229/*
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Joe W. Byers <ecjbosu@aol.com>
> To: John Putz <johnputz3655@yahoo.com>
> Cc: r-sig-finance@stat.math.ethz.ch
> Sent: Friday, December 7, 2007
2017 May 17
2
R-3.4.0 fails test
After installing R-3.4.0 I ran 'make check' which halted here:
$ > tail reg-tests-1d.Rout.fail -n 16
> ## format()ing invalid hand-constructed POSIXlt objects
> d <- as.POSIXlt("2016-12-06"); d$zone <- 1
> tools::assertError(format(d))
> d$zone <- NULL
> stopifnot(identical(format(d),"2016-12-06"))
> d$zone <- "CET" # =
2017 May 17
2
R-3.4.0 fails test
After installing R-3.4.0 I ran 'make check' which halted here:
$ > tail reg-tests-1d.Rout.fail -n 16
> ## format()ing invalid hand-constructed POSIXlt objects
> d <- as.POSIXlt("2016-12-06"); d$zone <- 1
> tools::assertError(format(d))
> d$zone <- NULL
> stopifnot(identical(format(d),"2016-12-06"))
> d$zone <- "CET" # =
2013 Oct 04
2
Possible POSIXlt / wday glitch & bugs.r-project.org status
Wanted to raise two questions:
1. Is bugs.r-project.org down? I haven't been able to reach it for two or three days:
```
ping bugs.r-project.org
PING rbugs.research.att.com (207.140.168.137): 56 data bytes
Request timeout for icmp_seq 0
Request timeout for icmp_seq 1
Request timeout for icmp_seq 2
Request timeout for icmp_seq 3
Request timeout for icmp_seq 4
Request timeout for icmp_seq 5
2011 Mar 23
0
suggestions re trunc.POSIXt
Dear all,
I hope this is a right place to post this; r-help might be appropriate
but it looks like I'm suggesting a change in base package, so I
decided to post here. (+ Apologies if that has been changed recently
-- the version I'm using is R.2.12.2 on Windows.)
I've noticed an unexpected behavior of trunc.POSIXt:
foo <- seq(as.POSIXct( "2009-10-23 22:00:00"),
2020 Oct 23
1
timezone tests and R-devel
Yes, you are absolutely right and I'm pretty sure this will be fixed in
one way or another.
IMO, the failing test should simply use all.equal.POSIXt's new argument
check.tzone=FALSE.
Two simple alternatives modifying all.equal.POSIXt behaviour:
- make check.tzone=FALSE the default: this is inconsistent with other
arguments of all.equal methods, always defaulting to stricter checks
-
2009 Apr 19
1
dynlm question: How to predefine formula for call to dynlm(formula) call
I want to set up a model with a formula and then run dynlm(formula)
because I ultimately want to loop over a set of formulas (see end of post)
R> form <- gas~price
R> dynlm(form)
Time series regression with "ts" data:
Start = 1959(1), End = 1990(4)
<snip>
Works OK without a Lag term
R> dynlm(gas ~ L(gas,1))
Time series regression with "ts" data:
Start =
2009 Mar 04
2
patch for axis.POSIXct (related to timezones)
I am finding that axis.POSIXct uses the local timezone for deciding where to
put tic marks, even if the data being plotted are in another time zone. The
solution is to use attr() to copy from the 'x' (provided as an argument) to
the 'z' (used for the 'at' locations).
I have pasted my proposed solution in section 1 below (as a diff). Then, in
section 2, I'll put some
2003 Aug 13
1
Problems with addition in big POSIX dates
Have you noticed any problems with big dates (>=1/1/2040) in R?
Here is the bit of code that I'm having trouble with:
> test.date <- strptime("1/1/2040",format="%m/%d/%Y")
>
> unlist(test.date)
sec min hour mday mon year wday yday isdst
0 0 0 1 0 140 0 0 0
>
> date.plus.one <- as.POSIXct(test.date) +
2020 Oct 01
3
timezone tests and R-devel
The return value of Sys.time() today with a timezone of US/Eastern is
unchanged between 4.0.3-patched and devel, but on devel the following test
fails
all.equal(x, as.POSIXlt(x))
with
x = Sys.time()
This means that devel does not complete make tests (failure on
tests/reg-tests-2.R)
It is entirely possible that it is an error on my end, I use
export TZ="US/Eastern"
but I have been