similar to: Rcpp and Object Factories

Hi, I have a general question on LoopUnswtich pass. Consider the following IR snippet: define i32 @test(i1 %cond) { br label %loop_begin loop_begin: br i1 %cond, label %loop_body, label %loop_exit loop_body: br label %do_something do_something: call void @some_func() noreturn nounwind br label %loop_begin loop_exit: ret i32 0 } declare void @some_func() noreturn After running

Hi guys, Am having a problem. I have this def in my index controller that works like this: def do_something $a = variable1 $b = variable2 $c = variable3 $d = ""<script language=\"Javascript\"> \n new Insertion.Bottom(''#{$c}'', ''#{$a} - #{$b}''); \n </script>" $trigger = "1" render(:partial =>

Considering the python code: for k, v in d.items(): do_something(k); do_something_else(v) I have the following for R: for (i in c(1:length(d))) { do_something(names(d[i])); do_something_else(d[[i]]) } This does not seem seems idiomatic. What is the best way of doing the same with R? Thanks. Luis

> On Jun 19, 2018, at 6:36 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 5:46 PM Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com <mailto:vsk at apple.com>> wrote: > Someone (Reid?) mentioned that we could try sinking constants to their point of first use as an alternative, and (IIUC) create new nodes with distinct DebugLocs for each use of a constant. I

PROBLEM I have two models, Blog and BlogComment. When a blog is initially created, it has no comments. Upon creation, the title and body are automatically added to the ferret index and directly searchable. However, when a comment is added to a blog, that comment does not get added to the index and is therefore not ferretable. The desired behavior is that when a comment is added to a blog, that the

I want to put a before_filter in application.rb, as follows: before_filter :do_something, :except_controller => [:admin] def do_something(options) options.stringify_keys! unless options[:except_controller].include?(controller_name) # do something useful end end Where I''m blocking is on how to get the ''options'' data in the do_something method. I think I

I'd like to pass a list object created by one function as an argument of another function. once inside the second function, I'd like to break the list up to it's individual elements, each then identifiable by the 'names' of the list. The list looks something like lst<-list(a=1, b=2, df=5, g=7) then inside the function I've been writing a sequence of statements that

FWIW: Debug information on constants feels odd to me. They are just values not something that is executed so conceptually I would not expect them to "happen" at a specific time/place in the program. That said most numbers are copied into registers or stored into memory and that is of course an interesting action. So in the original example I would hope to see debug info on whatever

Hi, extractRangeChecksFromBranch uses BranchProbabilityInfo to decide whether its worth trying the InductiveRangeCheckElimination transformation. For the following example: void split() { for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) { if (i < 99) do_something() else do_something_else() } } But the reported BPI is reported as 50/50 to whether do_something will be called, but we

I don't want to return a value, I want to interrupt the computation, that's why I need to re-throw . But before getting back to the user I want to run some cleanup code. G. On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 5:59 PM I?aki ?car <i.ucar86 at gmail.com> wrote: > > El s?b., 28 jul. 2018 a las 18:30, G?bor Cs?rdi > (<csardi.gabor at gmail.com>) escribi?: > > > > Anyone

Folks- I just started using Mocha and I wanted to try something but I couldn''t get it to work. I''m coming from the Java world, so my approach may not be optimal for Ruby. Say I''m testing a.do_something() which calls b.do_other_thing() twice, but I really don''t want to change b.do_other_thing(), just ''expect'' it to be called twice. I know I

Hi, I have reworked my previous example and got something which is accepted by tblgen: let isCall = 1, Defs = [R0, R1, R2, R3, R12, LR, D0, D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6, D7, CPSR] in { def ARM_ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP : ABXI<0b1011, (outs GPR:$dst), (ins i32imm:$ptr, i32imm:$old, i32imm:$new), "do_something", [(set GPR:$dst, (atomic_cmp_swap_32

i don''t even know if this is possible, so I''ll just ask. say I have a remote form. the form data gets submitted to the backend via AJAX. if there is a validation error in the form, i handle that on the AJAX side. however, if the form validates, I''d like to redirect the browser to a different page. Will a redirect_to work with an AJAX call or do I have to handle that

Adding Maxim On Apr 9, 2018, at 10:06 AM, Sam Parker via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: Hi, extractRangeChecksFromBranch uses BranchProbabilityInfo to decide whether its worth trying the InductiveRangeCheckElimination transformation. For the following example: void split() { for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) { if (i < 99)

This problem is likely to be specific to Windows, and particularly Win7. After a successful build of a package (R CMD build addendum), I immediately run an R CMD check for the same package. Not always, but _very_ often, I get the following error: C:\Users\nisabbe\Documents\@Doctoraat\R>R CMD check addendum Loading required package: tcltk Loading Tcl/Tk interface ... done Loading

Hello list. This is from an R session (admittedly, I''m still using R 2.11.1): > print function (x, ...) UseMethod("print") <environment: namespace:base> > showMethods("print") Function "print": <not a generic function> Don''t the two results contradict each other? Or do I have a terrible misunderstanding of what

Hi, all, How to get a time as a number? While script is running, I want to print the elapsed time something like TIME_AS_SECOND() in the following script inittime <- TIME_AS_SECOND() for (i in 1:100){ do_something(i) curtime <- TIME_AS_SECOND() elapsedtime <- curtime-inittime print(paste(i, elapsedtime)) } Thanks in advance, Hyunchul [[alternative HTML version

Am Mi., 18. März 2020 um 18:15 Uhr schrieb Chawla, Pankaj <pankaj.chawla at intel.com>: > > >> DependenceInfo is not using the AA interface correctly. Either DI has to be fixed, or another method added to AA that gives additional guarantees. Please see the bug report for details. > > Thanks for updating the bug report but GetUnderlyingObject() doesn't help in this case.

How would you spec out something like the following: def a_method x = Class.new do include Enumerable end # do something here with x end describe "The Anonymous Class" do before :each do @anonymous_class = mock Class Class.stub!(:new).and_return @anonymous_class end it "should create a new anonymous class" do

Dear R-Developers, I just started learning how to use Rcpp. Earlier while using it, I encountered an error as shown below: file74d8254b96d4.cpp: In function ‘Rcpp::NumericVector foo(Rcpp::NumericVector, Rcpp::NumericVector, Rcpp::NumericVector, Rcpp::Function, Rcpp::Function)’: file74d8254b96d4.cpp:10: error: invalid operands of types ‘SEXPREC*’ and ‘R_len_t’ to binary ‘operator/’ make: ***