similar to: Creating a file with reusable functions accessible throughout a computational biology cancer project

Hi, First of all, I would like to introduce myself as I will probably have many questions over the next few weeks and want to thank you guys in advance for your help. I'm a cancer researcher and I need to learn R to complete a few projects. I have an introductory background in Python. My questions at the moment are based on the following sample input file: *Sample_Input_File*

Hey, I just googled my error and many things came up. I followed the leads and read the ?read.delim page; I tried changing header = TRUE, and row.names = TRUE-- but I've still been having trouble fixing it, so I would greatly appreciate any help you can provide. Here is my code: rm(list=ls()) source("../../functions.R") uncurated <-

Hi guys, My code (next 2 lines below) isn't doing what I'm expecting it to: tmp <- ifelse(uncurated$days_to_tumor_recurrence=="null","norecurrence","recurrence") curated$recurrence_status <- tmp I want the column "recurrence_status" in my output file to have values "recurrence" (if the input value had a number in the

Hi-- I have three columns in an input file: MONTH QUARTER YEAR 2012-07 2012-3 2012 2001-07 2001-3 2001 2002-01 2002-1 2002 I want to make output like so: MONTH QUARTER YEAR 07 3 2012 07 3 2001 01 1 2002 I was having some trouble getting the regular expression to work. I think it should

I have the following files list: > list.files() [1] "Prostate-Cancer_cvs_Dir" [2] "Prostate_Cancer-miRNAs&Genes.Pathway.xml" [3] "Prostate_Cancer_Pathways-miRNAs-GeneTargets-Dir" [4] "Prostate_Cancer_Pathways-miRNAs-GeneTargets-Dir.zip" [5] "Prostate-miRNAs.OrganTargets.txt"

Hello, I''m using the scheduler to create several reusable workers of the same type, .e.g., RSSWorker, so I can avoid the overhead of initializing new processes (as suggested by Ezra to my previous question). Creating new workers through the external yaml seems pretty straightforward, but my question is is there a way to call these workers without using the job key? Currently, to use

Is there a development guide for best practices when making reusable components? For example, none of the login generators fit my requirements, and I want to write my own. But after I''m done, I''ll want to share it with multiple applications. Is there documentation for the right way to go about doing this? -- - Adam ** Expert Technical Project and Business Management ****

Hi All, Is that possible to make tinc as a reusable lib to make it more widely used in IOT world? and make release an official app for IOS、Android and windows possible? Tks.

On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 10:18:46PM +0800, Cong Monkey wrote: > Is that possible to make tinc as a reusable lib to make it more widely > used in IOT world? Yes, have a look at MeshLink: https://github.com/meshlink/meshlink > and make release an official app for IOS、Android and windows possible? I would love to, but I have no time myself to do that. There is an unofficial Android app:

> However, it is not very beginner friendly. There's two thing lacking: > editting the configuration files from the app, and being able to run the > app without root privileges. For the latter, the app and maybe tinc > itself might need to be changed to use the VPN API to create a tun > device and to pass it to the tinc daemon. I don't even know if there is > something

On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 10:40:12PM +0800, Cong Monkey wrote: > If release as libtinc possible, will that possible that you relicence > TINC as LGPL to make commercial use possible? Both tinc and MeshLink are licensed under the GPL and will stay that way. However, if you want to use MeshLink in a commercial project, you can buy a commercial license. -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind

Just wait tinc be more lib style for some future days:) 2016-10-09 22:45 GMT+08:00 Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org>: > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 10:40:12PM +0800, Cong Monkey wrote: > >> If release as libtinc possible, will that possible that you relicence >> TINC as LGPL to make commercial use possible? > > Both tinc and MeshLink are licensed under the GPL and will

I was planning to make an iOS port, but GPL means we can't make an App Store version. Also, the way Network Extension work means only tun mode is available. Sent from my iPhone > On 9 Oct 2016, at 23:55, Cong Monkey <congzhangzh at gmail.com> wrote: > > Just wait tinc be more lib style for some future days:) > > 2016-10-09 22:45 GMT+08:00 Guus Sliepen <guus at

> I was planning to make an iOS port, but GPL means we can't make an App Store version. Also, the way Network Extension work means only tun mode is available. I think GPL just forbidden link from(which need more link exception statement be added) but not link to Ne extension work with link from style? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Network extension apps are just like ordinary apps, only they can utilize the utun interface and create VPN entries. So I think, yes, tinc need to be linked from such apps. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 10, 28 Heisei, at 9:48, Cong Monkey <congzhangzh at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I was planning to make an iOS port, but GPL means we can't make an App Store version. Also,

2016-10-11 3:52 GMT+08:00 Mr.X <mrx at hcc.im>: > Network extension apps are just like ordinary apps, only they can utilize > the utun interface and create VPN entries. So I think, yes, tinc need to be > linked from such apps. link to and link from is mark as the main application's view, so, for NE extension it's link to libtinc( if there is a libtinc lib), that's

Hi, As you may know by now, yesterday on the Astricon the City of Amsterdam presented their large scale asterisk deployment of 20000 phones. Because they do not allow brand names to be used within the city, they call it 'IP Business Manager', but the software they use is in fact the Astium PBX, by NeoNova. Since we are very proud of this project, we have made the Astium available for

On Thursday, 1 December 2016 14:35:07 CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > You can now use -o rhv (-o rhev is supported for compatibility). This LGTM -- the only concern is that "output:rhev" will disappear from the machine-readable output (and thus potentially breaking users). I have PoC for handling better aliases for input & output modules, I will polish and submit it. Thanks, --

On Wednesday, 7 December 2016 08:34:35 CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 04:41:52PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > > On Thursday, 1 December 2016 14:35:07 CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > You can now use -o rhv (-o rhev is supported for compatibility). > > > > This LGTM -- the only concern is that "output:rhev" will disappear from

On Wednesday, 7 December 2016 10:10:36 CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 10:56:05AM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > > On Wednesday, 7 December 2016 08:34:35 CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 04:41:52PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > > > > On Thursday, 1 December 2016 14:35:07 CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > >