similar to: problems with yum and 4.3-->4.4

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-07:07.bind Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Predictable query ids in named(8) Category: contrib Module: bind Announced:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-07:07.bind Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Predictable query ids in named(8) Category: contrib Module: bind Announced:

On 02/12/2019 10:07, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 02.12.19 um 08:47 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: >> Hai, >> >> Sorry for the late reply. > Never mind, weekend is important ... > >> Here its just apt-get distupgrade --autoremove --purge >> Without the autoremove libldb1 is not removed so libldb2 can be installed. > # apt-get distupgrade

Hi there. I'm running an AD DC in a KVM VM, a centos7 server. named is showing a very hight cpu usage, close to 100%. I just increased the number of CPUs to 2 to cope. This is a small company, with perhaps 20 workstations and another 20 linux servers. There shouldn't be that much happening. top - 17:27:48 up 2:29, 1 user, load average: 1.08, 1.13, 1.09 Tasks: 139 total, 1 running,

On 19/05/2023 03:57, Steven Monai via samba wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > > On 2023-05-18 12:29 a.m., Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > >> On 18/05/2023 04:31, Steven Monai via samba wrote: > >>> Successfully obtained Kerberos ticket to DNS/dc33.ttwo.ad.example.org >>> as DC34$ >> >> That's one misconfiguration you probably have there,

On 2023-05-18 11:24 p.m., Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On 19/05/2023 03:57, Steven Monai via samba wrote: >> To be concrete: What do you recommend should be the contents of the >> respective /etc/resolv.conf files in my test? > In resolv.conf, 'domain' and 'search' are mutually exclusive and the > last one wins, as you need 'search', I would

Thank for your answer: But i dont know understand why is following not working: I want to restrict the ssh access for a special domain member: In my "sshd_config" i added: AllowGroups restrictaccess root With user2 im able to login via ssh! log: pam_krb5(sshd:auth): user user2 authenticated as user2 at ROOTRUDI.DE With user1 im not! log: User user1 from 192.168.0.100 not allowed

Am 02.12.19 um 11:43 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 02/12/2019 10:07, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >> Am 02.12.19 um 08:47 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: >>> Hai, >>> >>> Sorry for the late reply. >> Never mind, weekend is important ... >> >>> Here its just apt-get distupgrade --autoremove --purge >>> Without

In that case. apt-get update apt-get remove samba winbind --autoremove apt-get dist-upgrade --autoremove apt-get install samba winbind libnss-winbind libpam-winbind tdb-tools apt-get dist-upgrade --autoremove --purge As long as you dont use --purge, everything of samba will stay on the system and you able to install the buster version. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----

On 02/12/2019 10:51, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 02.12.19 um 11:43 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >> On 02/12/2019 10:07, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >>> Am 02.12.19 um 08:47 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: >>>> Hai, >>>> >>>> Sorry for the late reply. >>> Never mind, weekend is important ... >>>

Hi all, i have made some tests on the latest Ubuntu 16.04.3 server image. Upgrades were disabled... the configuration was always the same...a distributed replicated volume on 4 VM's with geo-replication to a dist. repl .volume on 4 VM's. i started with 3.7.20, upgrade to 3.8.15, to 3.10.9 to 3.12.5. After each upgrade i have tested the geo-replication which worked well anytime. then i

Hello, I have a rather annoying issue on going with one of my centos virtual servers. the server hosts a website using apache and mysql ,there are three persons involved with keeping the site up and running. and i am his root due to the fact he does not know anything with about Linux. there is an php/sql coder , and the site owner which only knows to use the CMS and upload new articles to the

Hi Kotresh, thanks for your response... i have made further tests based on ubuntu 16.04.3 (latest upgrades) and gfs 3.12.5 with following rsync version : 1. ii? rsync????????????????????????????? 3.1.1-3ubuntu1 2. ii? rsync????????????????????????????? 3.1.1-3ubuntu1.2 3. ii? rsync????????????????????????????? 3.1.2-2ubuntu0.1 in each test all nodes had the same rsync version installed. all

It is clear that rsync is failing. Are the rsync versions on all masters and slave nodes same? I have seen that has caused problems sometimes. -Kotresh HR On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:29 PM, Dietmar Putz <dietmar.putz at 3qsdn.com> wrote: > Hi all, > i have made some tests on the latest Ubuntu 16.04.3 server image. Upgrades > were disabled... > the configuration was always the

If anyone would like to help test the latest RPM on Centos 3, heres your chance. There are several new features that are not mentioned in Jeff's email, but as he said he wants to make sure it does no harm more than anything else. As an example though, this version supports: - runtime depedency checking (think of being able to have cpan modules that weren't installed by rpm being

Devin, I've CC-ed the list so this gets archived. > when trying to run ssh, I get: > > OpenSSL version mismatch: Built against 90602f, you have 90701f This is what I was saying before http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=104589343318200&w=2 . The binary packages provided by RedHat have many things compiled against them. If you don't follow the

Hello Producers "Longevity of Support" is an attractive drawcard for CentOS if it means the exact opposite of Fedora's "short support cycle" that does not provide updating of infrastructural libraries for very long, libraries which newer versions of applications (like Firefox, Thunderbird, Opera etc) depend on and which wont install unless the libraries are also newer

Cross-posting scares me, but... Have you looked at the latest RPMs for SuSE, from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/samba/ ? They've worked like a charm for me, thus far (revision after revision, a simple rpm -U * seems to work...) -----Original Message----- From: david rankin [mailto:drankin@cox-internet.com] Sent: Mon 9/12/2005 5:30 PM To: samba; Suse Linux Subject: [SLE] SuSE 9.3 and

Mates, I dunno if nobody else is using the samba binaries to put 3.0.20-1 on SuSE 9.3 -- or -- if I'm just doing something stupid, but there seem to be library problems. Specifically, we are getting library errors for the *.so.2 libraries, regardless of whether we try via YAST or RPM. david@nemesis:~/Documents/linux/rpms/samba320> ll total 19970 -rw-r--r-- 1 david users 60998

Hi all, by downgrade of ii? libc6:amd64 2.23-0ubuntu10 to ii? libc6:amd64 2.23-0ubuntu3 the problem was solved. at least in gfs testenvironment running gfs 3.13.2 and 3.7.20 and on our productive environment with 3.7.18. possibly it helps someone... best regards Dietmar Am 25.01.2018 um 14:06 schrieb Dietmar Putz: > > Hi Kotresh, > > thanks for your response... > > i