similar to: generically forward low-level graphic parametres in function

dear r community... it loks like i won't be able to reach homogenity of variance for my dataset, so i end up with welch anova instead of regular anova. documentation on this test is rather scarce, so maybe someone here can enlighten me a bit: - do i understand that no two-way implementation of the welch anova has been developed yet? - is there a post-hoc test for welch anovas implemented in

dear R community, i appologize as this is kind of a newbie question, but: I want to assign group letters (like in anova post-hoc tests) to data with combined means and SDs. It's easy to apply t-test formulas to get a materix like (A - D are treatments | A B C D ----------------------- A| T F F B| T F C| F D| where true stands for sign.

Hi, thanks for this great work. Just a minor point - maybe you should mention the rm -rf $FAKE_ROOT command within your README file: It caught me unexpected and I was looking a couple of minutes for the package artifact before I actually read the last line. Regards, Burkhard Kohl Lead Engineer Content Management burkhard.kohl at intershop.de INTERSHOP? http://www.intershop.de INTERSHOP

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowdapp at redhat.com> > To: "Omar Kohl" <omar.kohl at iternity.com> > Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 10:56:21 AM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Exact purpose of network.ping-timeout > > Sorry about the delayed response. Had to dig into the

Hi, I know that "glusterbot" text about ping-timeout almost by heart by now ;-) I have searched the complete IRC logs and Mailing list from the last 4 or 5 years for anything related to ping-timeout. The problem with "can be a very expensive operation" is that this is extremely vague. It would be helpful to put some numbers behind it. Of course I also understand that any

Restarts will go through a shutdown process. As long as the network isn't actively unconfigured before the final kill, the tcp connection will be shutdown and there will be no wait. On 12/28/17 20:19, Sam McLeod wrote: > Sure, if you never restart / autoscale anything and if your use case > isn't bothered with up to 42 seconds of downtime, for us - 42 seconds > is a really

Dear developers, We want to use "\S4method" to document new S4-methods for "[" and "[<-". We use this for other functions/methods and it works without any problem, but in case of "[" and "[<-" we didn't manage to bring this to work. The problem occurs in the development version of our package "distrSim" which can be found

10 seconds is a very long time for files to go away for applications used at any scale, it is however what I've set our failover time to after being shocked by the default of 42 seconds. -- Sam McLeod https://smcleod.net https://twitter.com/s_mcleod > On 27 Dec 2017, at 10:17 pm, Omar Kohl <omar.kohl at iternity.com> wrote: > > Hi, > >> If you set it to 10 seconds,

Hi...it is probably trivial, but I do not know how to do the following: I want the output of a xy plot to be plotted in different colors according to a given condition ... I want to plot temperature dependency of flow stress ; for some (rare) occurencies I've got a special condition (chemical composition change) , and I want these points to appear on the same graph...I do know how to change

Sure, if you never restart / autoscale anything and if your use case isn't bothered with up to 42 seconds of downtime, for us - 42 seconds is a really long time for something like a patient management system to refuse file attachments from being uploaded etc... We apply a strict patching policy for security and kernel updates, we often also load balance between underlying physical hosts and

The reason for the long (42 second) ping-timeout is because re-establishing fd's and locks can be a very expensive operation. With an average MTBF of 45000 hours for a server, even just a replica 2 would result in a 42 second MTTR every 2.6 years, or 6 nines of uptime. On December 27, 2017 3:17:01 AM PST, Omar Kohl <omar.kohl at iternity.com> wrote: >Hi, > >> If you set it

Dear all, I wrote the following batch script on a iMac, and ran it on a linux mosix cluster. tu <- read.table("cage.mm5.tags.rna_lib.CAA-CAJ.tu-reshape.table") tu_reshaped <- t(reshape(tu[1:50,], direction="wide", timevar="tu", idvar=c("rna","lib"))) write.table(tu_reshaped, "cage.mm5.tags.rna_lib.CAA-CAJ.tu-reshaped.table")

Dear Developers, I'm updating my R installation via svn (currently: Revision 44626). For some time now (sorry don't know the exact revision number) make for R devel yields the following error make[4]: *** Keine Regel vorhanden, um das Target ?../../../src/include/R_ext/GraphicsBase.h?, ben?tigt von ?g_fontdb.o?, zu erstellen. Schluss. (translation: no rule to make target ...

Sorry about the delayed response. Had to dig into the history to answer various "why"s. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Omar Kohl" <omar.kohl at iternity.com> > To: gluster-users at gluster.org > Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2017 6:41:48 PM > Subject: [Gluster-users] Exact purpose of network.ping-timeout > > Hi, > > I have a question

Hi, > If you set it to 10 seconds, and a node goes down, you'll see a 10 seconds freez in all I/O for the volume. Exactly! ONLY 10 seconds instead of the default 42 seconds :-) As I said before the problem with the 42 seconds is that a Windows Samba Client will disconnect (and therefore interrupt any read/write operation) after waiting for about 25 seconds. So 42 seconds is too high. In

Dear all, I am trying to repeat an example from Sokal and Rohlfs "Biometry" -- Box 11.4, example of a randomized-complete-blocks experiment. The data is fairly simple: series genotype weight 1 pp 0.958 1 pb 0.985 1 bb 0.925 2 pp 0.971 2 pb 1.051 2 bb 0.952 3 pp 0.927 3 pb 0.891 3 bb 0.892 4

Dear R devels, let's say I have three packages "pkg1", "pkg2" and "pkg3" which all contain new S4 classes and methods. Where "pkg3" depends on "pkg2" and "pkg2" depends on "pkg1". Moreover, all three packages have namespaces. 1) I use ".onLoad <- function(lib, pkg) require(methods)". Do I also have to

Dear R Core, pairwise.wilcox.test does not handle "paired = TRUE" correctly; e.g. set.seed(13) x <- rnorm(20) g <- c(rep(1, 10), rep(2, 10)) wilcox.test(x ~ g)$p.value # 0.075 pairwise.wilcox.test(x, g)$p.value # 0.075, o.k wilcox.test(x ~ g, paired = TRUE)$p.value # 0.105 pairwise.wilcox.test(x, g, paired = TRUE)$p.value # 0.075, wrong The line wilcox.test(xi, xj,

Dear All, I am using roptest function of package "ROptEst" (Kohl and Ruckdeschel (2019)) to find out the ML, CvM-MD, and the RMX estimator and their asymptotic confidence intervals. I am assuming 1-5% of erroneous data for the RMX estimator. Then I am trying to Plot the data in the form of a histogram and add the three Gamma distribution densities with the estimated parameters and

No code or data came through. Please read the posting guidelines. On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:38 PM Upananda Pani <upananda.pani at gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear All, > > I am using roptest function of package "ROptEst" (Kohl and Ruckdeschel > (2019)) to find out the ML, CvM-MD, and the RMX estimator and their > asymptotic confidence intervals. I am assuming 1-5% of