similar to: Help in a project

Hi Alok, Echoing Anton's statements, please provide a testcase! :) Apart from that, looking at your patch and description I actually think that it is estimateRSStackSizeLimit that is wrong. It is performing a check for a Thumb2 addressing mode whether the target has a FP register. That's the main check - for some reason it is appending another check AFI->hasStackFrame() which seems

Dear R-help forum members, Suppose I have a data-frame having two variables and single data for each of them, as described below. variable_1           variable_2         10                          20 I have written a function, say, 'fun' which uses input 10 and 20 and gives me desired result. fun = function(X, Y)          {          X + Y              #( I am just giving an example of

Hello, I would like to select cases using multiple logical operations (e.g. X or Y or Z) without having to repeat the dataframe$variable within the subscript. My working code (with a single logical operator) currently looks like this: dataframe$newvariable[data$oldvariable=="X"]<-"group1" I thought this next line of code might do what I wanted, but it doesn't:

I am new to R, but have been using SAS for years. In this transition period, I am finding myself pulling my hair out to do some of the simplest things. An example of this is that I need to generate a new variable based on the outcome of several existing variables in a data row. In other words, if the variable in all three existing columns are "Yes", then then the new variable should

Hi! When I run "R CMD check" on the current development version of my R package "frontier" [1], there is no difference between the output of the test scripts in the /tests/ folder and the saved output files (.Rout.save). However, if I change an R file in the /R/ folder, some calls to the Fortran code (called by ".Fortran()") return different results, although the

Hi, I am an R newbie and one thing I am having trouble with binding variables that I have created within one data frame into a new data frame when using na.omit(). To illustrate this problem I will give the example I am working on and the approah I have been using:- data.frame1<-filepath.... attach(data.frame1) #create a new variable using a function new.variable<-rep(1,length(weight3))

Hello Alok, > I fixed this by performing the CanEliminateFrame and > RegInfo->cannotEliminateFrame checks before the call to > estimateRSSStackSizeLimit, since these values are available before BigStack > is initialized. Does that sound reasonable? I’ve attached a patch with my > change. Will you please provide a testcase which reproduces the problem? Thanks! -- With best

Hi, I have a simple question. I have a variable with 3 levels. Variable A A A A A A B B B B B B C C C C C C I need to make a new vector renaming de levels B and C for D. NewVariable A A A A A A D D D D D D D D D D D D I dont find how to make it in manuals or in this list. Can anyone help-me??? Thank you Ronaldo -- Agnes' Law: Almost everything in life is easier to get into than out of.

Hello LLVMDev, I've encountered what looks like a bug in LLVM 2.9, it doesn't appear to be fixed in 3.0 either. The problem occurs in function ARMFrameLowering.cpp:processFunctionBeforeCalleeSavedScan. There's a circular dependency in setting the variable BigStack and AFI->setHashStackFrame(true). The expression which initializes BigStack calls estimateRSSStackSizeLimit which in

Hi all, Recently, I have upgraded the asterisk as following. asterisk-1.4.13 asterisk-addon-1.4.4 libpri-1.4.1 zaptel-1.4.5.1 Usage of the server: inbound and outbound call, queue, mixmonitor, meetme, moh After upgrade, the server get segfault randomly and asterisk crash and restart itself. I got 2 core dumps of the segfault. Based on the core dump, we can't figure out the root cause to

Thomas, Thank you for your reply about the for () loop. The as.character advice worked. Sorry for the delay in getting back to?I had to set the project aside for a few weeks. This didn?t work exactly as is for (patient in as.character(1:n)){ pt <- MRN == patient (rest of the function) } But this did for (patient in as.character(levels(MRN))){ pt <- MRN == patient (rest of the function)

Hello, I'm trying to plot connected time series of two variables in a lattice plot: xyplot(y1 + y2 ~ t, data=size, type="b") y2 has missing data for some of the observations and some points are therefore not connected. It would make theoretical sense to connect the points - is there a way of doing that? (Without filling the obserations using package 'zoo'). Thanks,

I am using llvm-2.6 and the ConstProp.cpp file is http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/ConstantProp_8cpp_source.html and the exact error message is: llvm[0]: Compiling ConstantProp.cpp for Release build (PIC) /home/tarun/Desktop/compiler/LLVM/llvm-2.6/include/llvm/Analysis/ConstantFolding.h: In member function ‘virtual bool<unnamed>::ConstantPropagation::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)’:

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 5:27 PM, tarun agrawal <tarun at cse.iitb.ac.in> wrote: > I am using llvm-2.6  and the ConstProp.cpp file is > http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/ConstantProp_8cpp_source.html > > and the exact error message is: > > llvm[0]: Compiling ConstantProp.cpp for Release build  (PIC) >

The clone llvm:CloneBasicBlock copies the phi function in the replicated basic block from the original basic block. I don't want the copy of phi in relplicated block. For now I am creating .bc file with -O0 option so that it doesn't generate phi function in first place. Is this a good approach or there are some other function available for it. Tarun On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Eli

Hi While compiling the ConstantProp.cpp I am getting the following error. error: too few arguments to function ‘llvm::Constant* llvm::ConstantFoldInstruction( llvm::Instruction*, llvm::LLVMContext&, const llvm::TargetData*) I am using llvm-2.6 and the ConstProp.cpp file is http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/ConstantProp_8cpp_source.html and the exact error message is: llvm[0]: Compiling

On 5/3/11 4:08 PM, tarun agrawal wrote: > HI > > I know it is a very simple question not worth asking here but I am > really struggling pls help me out.. This is a question worth asking; it's just that not everyone can answer all the time. :) If all you want to do is to follow the SSA def-use chain within a single function, then this is very easy. All you have to do is use

Thanks John, I know how to iterate through def-use chains and I also have realized the need for an algorithm to do the work. But the algorithm I am able to figure out is not linear in time. It wold be a great help if someone suggest me a way to get all basic-block along all path between two instruction. On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:00 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: >

While compiling the ConstantProp.cpp I am getting the following error. error: too few arguments to function ‘llvm::Constant* llvm::ConstantFoldInstruction(llvm::Instruction*, llvm::LLVMContext&, const llvm::TargetData*) Regards Tarun -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I need to get all the basic blocks that are there, in the path from definition of an instruction to use of that instruction. Regards Tarun -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110503/4d3852b7/attachment.html>