similar to: RE How to convert an ftable object to a matrix including the row names?

Dear expeRts, What's the easiest way to convert an ftable object to a matrix such that the row names of the ftable object are shown in the first couple of columns of the matrix? This is (typically) required, for example, when the final goal is to print the matrix via xtable. Below is a rather complicated example of how to do it... Cheers, Marius ## Goal: convert an ftable() to a

Hello everyone, I am looking to replace a file sharing solution, based on webdav, by samba 4.2. I?ve just read the technical notes on the wiki but couldyou tell me more about the technical feasibility of the following: *1/* Can Samba 4.2 authenticate users through an already set external LDAP server rather than its own internal user/password database ? *2/* Is it possible to customize the

Dear R-developers, I would like to suggest a 'method' slot for format.ftable() (see an adjusted 'format.ftable()' below, taken from the source of R-2.15.2). At the moment, format.ftable() contains several empty cells due to the way the row and column labels are printed. This creates problems (= unwanted empty columns/rows) when converting an ftable to a LaTeX table; see an

Hello, I followed a howto found on samba website. I use Samba v3.2.5 shares whom access are authentified against Active Directory, I have an error 233, saying that there is no process at the end of the chanel (excuse me if my english is not so good). The kerberos setup is good and kinit works fine. net ads join ... worked fine. Except a dns error message, I can see the server in Active

Dear expeRts, Please find attached the .diff for a bug fix in R-devel 62124. format.ftable() fails to format ftable()s correctly which have no row.vars or no col.vars. That should work with the patch (the example code below also runs correctly for all the (new) 'method's). Cheers, Marius --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (ft1 <- ftable(Titanic,

How can I export an ftable object in the same format that appears in R command window? For testing that i was using this example that is in help of this function. ## Start with a contingency table. ftable(Titanic, row.vars = 1:3) ftable(Titanic, row.vars = 1:2, col.vars = "Survived") ftable(Titanic, row.vars = 2:1, col.vars = "Survived") ## Start with a data frame. x <-

Dear latexRs, I tried to make a latex printout of a simple categorial ftable. It should look like the output of print.ftable. Any ideas how to get the syntax of summary.formula right. Or some alternative? As far I see, xtable does not have method for ftable. Dieter library(Hmisc) n=500 sex <- factor(sample(c("m","f"), n, rep=TRUE)) treatment <-

>>>>> Gabor Grothendieck >>>>> on Thu, 14 May 2020 06:56:06 -0400 writes: > If you are looking at ftable could you also consider adding > a way to convert an ftable into a usable data.frame such as > the ftable2df function defined here: > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11141406/reshaping-an-array-to-data-frame/11143126#11143126 > and there

Following some discussion on R-help, I'd like to propose that an as.matrix method be added to those available for ftable objects. The reason for this is that there are a variety of situations where one needs to flatten a 3+ way table, but then use that for analysis as a matrix, not just for pretty-printing. There is an as.table method to turn the result back to a table, but an as.matrix

Full_Name: John Hendrickx Version: 1.6.2 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (80.126.78.108) (This is not a bug report but a request to add a feature to future versions of R. Hope this is an appropriate place). I'd like to suggest adding an option to ftable to allow percentages. It would be easy to do and backwards compatible. Percentage tables are useful in educational contexts, whereas

Thanks for the links. I agree that such a feature would be a nice addition, and could make ftable even more useful. In the same spirit, I think it could be useful to mention the undocumented base::as.data.frame.matrix function in documentation of table and xtabs (in addition to the already mentioned base::as.data.frame.table). The conversion from ftable/table/xtabs to data.frame is a common task

The ftable structure is not an ordinary matrix. Instead, it has the body of the table with several cbind- and rbind-ed rows and columns of label information. The example in ?ftable has two row factors and two column factors. Continuing with the example in ?ftable, enter tmp <- ftable(mtcars$cyl, mtcars$vs, mtcars$am, mtcars$gear, row.vars = c(2, 4), dnn =

One can use as.data.frame(as.matrix(tab)) to avoid calling as.data.frame.matrix directly (although I find I do use as.data.frame.matrix anyways sometimes even though it is generally better to call the generic.). Also note that the various as.data.frame methods do not address the examples in the SO links I posted which is why I mentioned it. On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 9:22 AM SOEIRO Thomas

I would like to suggest that an 'append' argument be added to write.ftable(). This would allow, for example, the user to append ftable() output to a text report. I have attached an svn patch to ftable.R that makes the proposed change to write.ftable(). [A very trivial change since 'append' is simply passed to cat().] I have also attached a patch to read.ftable.Rd which documents

hi there is there a way to convert objects of class ftable into LaTex code preserving the 'look' with row and column infomation? xtable() {xtable} can't handle such objects and latex() {Hmisc} just texify the number matrix, without row/column information regards soren

>>>>> SOEIRO Thomas >>>>> on Wed, 13 May 2020 20:27:15 +0000 writes: > Dear all, > I haven't received any feedback so far on my proposal to make "justify" argument available in stats:::format.ftable > Is this list the appropriate place for this kind of proposal? Yes, it is.. Actually such a post is even a "role

I am generating an ftable (by running ftable on the results of a xtabs command) and I am getting the following. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Var1? Var2 date ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? group? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2007-01-01? ? ? ? ? q1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?1? ? 9 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?q2 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Hoping someone can help me with xtabs and ftable. I'm trying to get a pair of ftables (possibly more) next to each other. For example: > dunhill_lights_xtab<-ftable(xtabs(grossedupobs ~ gender+age_group + dunhill_lights, data = ciggs)) > dunhill_lights_xtab dunhill_lights No Yes gender age_group Female

This bug shows up in ftable() in both r-patched and r-devel: > x <- c(1,2) > y <- c(1,2) > z <- c(1,1) > ftable(z,y) y 1 2 z 1 1 1 > ftable(z,x) x 1 z 1 2 Since x and y are identical, the two ftable results should be the same, but they are not. I've only been able to see this when the column variable is named "x", so it looks like a

I apologize in advance if this is the wrong forum for this report/request, and for the fact that I have not read the code for ftable.formula in any detail. >From reading the documentation for ftable.formula, I expected that the following two calls to ftable would produce the same results: data(UCBAdmissions) ftable(UCBAdmissions, row.vars = "Dept", col.vars = c("Gender",