similar to: Saving misclassified records into dataframe within a loop

Hi, Suppose i have generated an object using the following : fit <- rpart(Kyphosis ~ Age + Number + Start, data=kyphosis) And when i print fit, i get the following : n= 81 node), split, n, loss, yval, (yprob) * denotes terminal node 1) root 81 17 absent (0.7901235 0.2098765) 2) Start>=8.5 62 6 absent (0.9032258 0.0967742) 4) Start>=14.5 29 0 absent (1.0000000

Greetings All, I am looking to write a parametrized Rscript that will accept a variable name(that also is the name of the flat file), transform the data into a data frame and preform various modeling on the structure and save the output and plot of the model. In this example i am using a rpart decision tree. The only problem i am having is integrating the parameter into the internal object name

Hello all, I wish to extract the terms from an rpart object. Specifically, I would like to be able to know what is the response variable (so I could do some manipulation on it). But in general, such a method for rpart will also need to handle a "." case (see fit2) Here are two simple examples: fit1 <- rpart(Kyphosis ~ Age + Number + Start, data=kyphosis) fit1$call fit2 <-

Hello Everyone, I'm doing a Classification trees with categorical explanatory variables using library rpart and I would like to do a prediction for some data imputs. I don't know where's a function or how can I do it?. Is there someone can help ?? ¿. Here's the code that I'm using. library(rpart) fit <- rpart(Kyphosis ~ Age + Number + Start, data=kyphosis) plot(fit)

I am using rpart to build a model for later predictions. To save the prediction across restarts and share the data across nodes I have been using "save" to persist the result of rpart to a file and "load" it later. But the saved size was becoming unusually large (even with binary, compressed mode). The size was also proportional to the amount of data that was used to create the

Hello I want to build a classification tree for a binary response variable while the condition for the final tree should be : The total misclassification for each group (zero or one) will be less then 10% . for example: if I have in the root 100 observations, 90 from group 0 and 10 from group 1, I want that in the final tree a maximum of 9 and 1 observations out of group 0 and 1, respectively,

I run the following code: library(rpart) data(kyphosis) fit <- rpart(Kyphosis ~ ., data=kyphosis) plot(fit) text(fit, use.n=TRUE) The text labels represent the count of each class at the leaf node. Unfortunately, the numbers are rounded and in scientific notation rather than the exact number of examples sorted by that node in each class. The plot is supposed to look like

Dear R-users I am using RPART package to get regression trees. However having trouble getting the text function to put the full splitting rule number on the plot, instead to puts it in scientific notation. When a covariate has 1e4 or greater number of digits then the splitting rule number displayed on the plot is in scientific notation. But print.rpart displays the splitting rules in full.

Hi, I have a technical question about rpart: according to Breiman et al. 1984, different costs for misclassification in CART can be modelled either by means of modifying the loss matrix or by means of using different prior probabilities for the classes, which again should have the same effect as using different weights for the response classes. What I tried was this: library(rpart)

Philipp Benner reported a Debian bug report against r-cran-rpart aka rpart. In short, the issue has to do with how rpart evaluates a formula and supporting arguments, in particular 'weights'. A simple contrived example is ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- library(rpart) ## using data from help(rpart), set up simple example myformula <-

Simple example: # Classification Tree with rpart library(rpart) # grow tree fit <- rpart(Kyphosis ~ Age + Number + Start, method="class", data=kyphosis) Now I would like to know how can I measure the "importance" of each of my three explanatory variables (Age, Number, Start) in the model? If this was a regression model, I could have looked at p values from the

I ran this code (several times) from the Quick-R web page ( http://www.statmethods.net/advstats/cart.html) but my cross-validation errors increase instead of decrease (same thing happens with an unrelated data set). Why does this happen? Am I doing something wrong? # Classification Tree with rpart library(rpart) # grow tree fit <- rpart(Kyphosis ~ Age + Number + Start,

Hello, Due to exploration of the JIT capabilities offered through the {compiler} package, I came by the fact that using enableJIT(2) can *slow* the rpart function (from the {rpart} package) by a magnitude of about 10 times. Here is an example code to run: library(rpart) require(compiler) enableJIT(0) # just making sure that JIT is off # We could also use enableJIT(1) and it would be fine fo

Hi, is it possible to put a summary of an rpart-Object into a tktext-window? Here is what I'm trying to do: fit <- rpart(Kyphosis ~ Age + Number + Start, data=kyphosis) tt <- tktoplevel() tex <- tktext(tt) tkpack(tex) tkinsert(tex, "end", summary(fit)) But since the summary of an object is a list, I always get back the following error-message: cannot handle object of

Hi, I am using rpart package to fit classification trees. library(rpart) fit <- rpart(Kyphosis ~ Age + Number + Start, data=kyphosis) plot(fit,uniform=T) text(fit, use.n=TRUE) But I am unable to label the branches (not the nodes) of the tree. Can somebody help me out in this? Thank you, Regards Utkarsh Singhal | Amba Research Ph +91 80 3980 8017 | Mob +91 99 0295 8815

Hi there. I was wondering if somebody knows how to perform a bagging procedure on a classification tree without running the classifier with weights. Let me first explain why I need this and then give some details of what I have found out so far. I am thinking about implementing the bagging procedure in Matlab. Matlab has a simple classification tree function (in their Statistics toolbox) but

? data=read.table("http://statcourse.com/research/boston.csv", , sep=",", header = TRUE) ? library(rpart) ? fit=rpart (MV~ CRIM+ZN+INDUS+CHAS+NOX+RM+AGE+DIS+RAD+TAX+ PT+B+LSTAT) predict(fit,data[4,]) plot only reveals part of the tree in contrast to the results on obtains with CART or C5 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [R] help with rpart From: Sarah

I am trying to create a classification tree using either tree or rpart functions but when it comes to plotting the results the formatting I get is different than what I see in all the tutorials (like http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XNhqO1bu0A or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3mLNpeke0I&feature=related or http://www.statmethods.net/advstats/cart.html "tree for kyphosis"). I am

Hello all, I'm was going through the help for ?rpart.object And noticed some inconsistencies, Some might be a mistake in the help file and some might be my misunderstanding. The help in the section: value -> frame (first paragraph), states that: > yval, the fitted value of the response at each node, *and splits, a two > column matrix of left and right split labels for each node. *

I tried multiple imputation with aregImpute() and fit.mult.impute() in Hmisc 3.8-3 (June 2010) and R-2.12.1. The warning message below suggests that summary(f) of fit.mult.impute() would only use the last imputed data set. Thus, the whole imputation process is ignored. "Not using a Design fitting function; summary(fit) will use standard errors, t, P from last imputation only. Use