Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Patch-o-matic support"
2005 Apr 06
3
How to use Patch-o-matic ?
Hi,
i have used shorewall for several years now, but now i have a problem i
can not solve by my own.
I use Debian (Testing/Sarge) with shorewall 2.2 and 2.6.10 Kernel.
In the next few weeks i need several IPSEC VPN tunnels - ans thats the
problem.
"shorewall check" tells me that "Policy Match: not available".
As i have RTFMd i need some iptables ans netfilter patches for 2.6
2004 May 28
2
faq-o-matic gone
The rsync faq-o-matic was broken during the recent machine migration.
Since there was relatively little useful content and a lot of
unanswered or pointless questions, I am going to remove the links to
it.
If anyone feels like maintaining an FAQ please do so.
--
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type:
2005 Jul 29
1
UNDI - Rom-O-Matic -- A bit off topic..
Hi,
I work in Dell Support and I have a customer with a PowerEdge 1650 Server with Intel? PRO/1000 XT (82544GC Gigabit Ethernet Controllers).
The nic is integrated on the motherboard.
The customer is using a Linux system with DHCP+tftp to PXE boot and load an MS-Dos 6.22 image, with an UNDI driver, over to the PowerEdge 1650 and then map a Samba share to install Windows 2000.
The customer get
2006 Aug 08
1
netfilter patch-o-matic: where did all the patches go?
Hi all,
I haven''t been paying attention to this for a while, but now that I
download the latest patch-o-matic-ng, I see that most of the patches are
gone...
Anybody have an idea where I can download the ''extras'' repository?
Specifically geoip.
Thanks!
-justin
2003 Jan 07
0
[ANNOUNCE] New netfilter/iptables patch-o-matic release
--KMIs29sPfC/9Gbii
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Good news, Everyone! (TM)
The netfilter core team announces a new release of the netfilter
patch-o-matic suite:
patch-o-matic-20030107
This release contains the most up-to-date bugfixes and new features for=20
the netfilter/iptables subsystem of the 2.4.x Linux
2003 Oct 01
0
[ANNOUNCE] New netfilter/iptables patch-o-matic release
--BU7+kJFeeDlNltZg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Good news, Everyone! (TM)
The netfilter core team announces a new release of the netfilter
patch-o-matic suite:
patch-o-matic-20030912
This release contains the most up-to-date bugfixes and new features for=20
the netfilter/iptables subsystem of the 2.4.x Linux
2007 May 23
0
iptables patch-o-matic
Hi,
I am trying to install some additional iptables modules on a CentOS 5 Box
(imq, tarpit, geoip). Can anyone recommend a version of patch-o-matic-ng that
works well with the CentOS 5 kernel sources (2.6.18-8.1.4)? The most current
version (patch-o-matic-ng-20070521.tar.bz2) does not compile. With
patch-o-matic-ng-20061128.tar.bz2 I could at least get tarpit working but
geoip and imq seem
2009 Feb 05
2
TDM400P Circuit/channel congestion problem
Hello,
I have an issue with Digium TDM 400 card series. When I try to make
outgoing call (PSTN call) for example, the Zap channel could not be
created and busy channel message appeared. Below is the full log :
[Feb 5 09:26:17] VERBOSE[3047] logger.c: -- Executing [s at macro-
dialout-trunk:20] Dial("SIP/213-09648720", "ZAP/g1/08170709XXX|300|")
in new stack
[Feb
2004 Nov 18
1
Re: Shared object not being built by patch-o-matic-ng
Stian B. Barmen schrieb:
> I try to use patch-o-matic-ng for installation. Kernel patching works
> nicely but the libipt_ipp2p.so shared object does not get built. I find
> the .c file in the patch-o-matic tree under ipp2p but I don''t know how
> to manually compile it.
> My lsmod includes the sucsessfully made ipt_ipp2p module and I also
> recompiled iptables for
2003 Feb 08
0
[Bug 46] New: ..patch-o-matic: nfnetlink_conntrack.c or -.h ... compile failure:
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46
Summary: ..patch-o-matic: nfnetlink_conntrack.c or -.h ...
compile failure:
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: patch-o-matic
Platform: i386
OS/Version: RedHat Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P2
Component:
2003 Feb 08
0
[Bug 46] ..patch-o-matic: nfnetlink_conntrack.c or -.h ... compile failure:
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46
laforge@netfilter.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-08 13:06 -------
what compiler are you
2006 Jul 08
2
TARPIT target in iptables
Has anyone been successful at using the TARPIT target in iptables under
CentOS 4?
I am using CentOS 4.3, fully updated with iptables-1.2.11-3.1.RHEL4 and
kernel-2.6.9-34.107.plus.c4
Doing a locate on TARPIT returns:
# locate TARPIT
/lib/iptables/libipt_TARPIT.so
This makes me think that the TARPIT target would be valid, however when I
try to use it, I get the following reponse:
# iptables
2006 Nov 08
1
Running iptables/netfilter module connlimit with stock CentOS4
Greetings folks,
I've been researching the various iptables modules that are included
with the stock CentOS4 distro; particularly the connlimit module.
Is connlimit included by default?
I thought it is since performing
# iptables -m connlimit --help
returns information on connlimit usage along with the general iptables
help info:
<SNIP>
connlimit v1.2.11 options:
[!]
2003 Feb 08
0
[Bug 46] ..patch-o-matic: nfnetlink_conntrack.c or -.h ... compile failure:
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46
------- Additional Comments From arnt@c2i.net 2003-02-08 18:09 -------
..sorry, this is crucial info; compilers: RH-7.3:
[root@gw linux-2.4.18-24.7.x]# rpm -q gcc
gcc-2.96-113
[root@gw linux-2.4.18-24.7.x]#
...and ditto for RH-8.0:
[root@fw linux-2.4.18-24.8.0]# rpm -q gcc
gcc-3.2-7
2003 Feb 14
0
[Bug 46] ..patch-o-matic: nfnetlink_conntrack.c or -.h ... compile failure:
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46
laforge@netfilter.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|blocker |trivial
------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-14 09:27 -------
#include
2004 Apr 22
1
IMQ compile procedure ??
Hi Guys,
I''m trying to compile IMQ with kernel-2.4.26 and iptables-1.2.9
and I want to know is this procedure is correct:
----------------------------------------
- In Kernel 2.4.26 Directory (/usr/src/linux)
# cd /usr/src/linux
# wget http://www.linuximq.net/patchs/linux-2.4.24-imq.diff
# patch -p1 < linux-2.4.24-imq.diff
- In Patch O Matic Directory
2004 Oct 01
4
Re: Error: Your kernel and/or iptables does not not support policy match: ipsec
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
claas@rootdir.de wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I am trying to get ipsec with kernel 2.6.8.1 and shorewall 2.1.9 running,
> but I still have a problem:
>
> Validating hosts file...
> Error: Your kernel and/or iptables does not not support policy
match: ipsec
>
> I had a look for netfilter patch-o-matic, but I did not find the
2004 Sep 08
6
netfilter modules
hi,
there is no support for patch-o-matic netfilter modules. what i have to do
if i want to use several patch-o-matic modules?
which parts of code has to be changed and will that changed be included
into the main shorewall tree in future or not?
best regards
claus
2006 Sep 02
3
Traffic shaper based on UIDs
Hello!
I need assistance to solve my problem related to traffic shaping based on
the user ids.
The problem: each unix user (of the linux host) has to be limited with
incoming channel (internet) bandwidth. I need this to implement
internet access solution based on ltsp (http://www.ltsp.org).
As far as I know the best way to shape traffic in linux is CBQ.
But there is no filter based on unix
2013 Feb 27
2
[LLVMdev] arm compiler benchmarks
What about benchmarks on other Arm devices?
On 02/26/2013 02:52 PM, Jim Grosbach wrote:
> Cortex-M0 is a Thumb1 only device. There hasn't been any concerted
> effort to tune LLVM's Thumb1 output in quite a long time. Even back then
> (2008 or so), the effort was mainly to get it to work acceptably, with
> the real performance tuning work being done for Thumb2. I'm not
>