similar to: time dependent hazard ratios

To Danardonos concern of splitting time for records with delayed entry: This can fairly easily be accomodated, by simply splitting time in small intervals of time since entry into the study, and then compute the value of the other timescales for each of these e.g.: current.age <- time.from.entry + age.at.entry but the cut on the other timescales will not be exactly where you may want them

Dear All, since years I am struggling with Surv objects in data.frames. The following seems to have to do with it. See below the modified example from the help page of survSplit. The original works, as expected. If, however, a Surv object is added to the data.frame, each record gets doubled. Is there some solution other than avoiding Surv objects in data.frames? Thanks, Heinz

I've searched the Web with Google and do not find what might cause this particular error from an invocation of cenboxplot: cenboxplot(cu.t$quant, cu.t$ceneq1, cu.t$era, range=1.5, main='Total Recoverable Copper', ylab='Concentration (mg/L)', xlab='Time Period') Error in if (n > 0) (1L:n - a)/(n + 1 - 2 * a) else numeric() : argument is of length zero I do

Thanks Jim for pointing out how to properly ask. Here is is my question and a small subset of the data and output. I have a data set with many blanks. The blanks should be replaced with zero once imported. I tried read.table, read.csv (R 2.8 version),or scan, but none was successful. Any suggestion, please.. thanks. Keun-Hyung >garoben=read.table("c:\\Rdata\\garoben.txt",header=T,

Hi everyone, This is about documentation for the model.frame() page. The get_all_vars() function (added in R 2.5.0) is a great addition, but the behavior of its '...' argument is different from that of model.frame() with which it is documented and this creates ambiguity. The current docs read: \item{\dots}{further arguments such as \code{data}, \code{na.action}, \code{subset}. Any

Hi, Suppose I have the following vector (data points): > x [1] 36.0 57.3 73.3 92.0 300.4 80.9 19.8 31.4 85.8 44.9 24.6 48.0 [13] 28.0 38.3 85.2 103.6 154.4 128.5 38.3 72.4 122.7 123.1 41.8 21.7 [25] 143.6 120.2 46.6 29.2 44.8 25.0 57.3 96.4 29.4 62.9 66.4 30.0 [37] 24.1 14.8 56.6 102.4 117.5 90.4 37.2 79.6 27.8 17.1 26.6 16.3 [49] 41.4 48.9 24.1

Hallo, I have this dataset with repeated measures. There are two within-subject factors, "formant" (2 levels: 1 and 2) and "f2 Ref" (25 levels: 670, 729, 788, 846, 905, 1080, 1100, 1120, 1140, 1170, 1480, 1470, 1450, 1440, 1430, 1890, 1840, 1790, 1740, 1690, 2290, 2210, 2120, 2040, 1950), and one between-subject factor, lang (2 levels:1 and 2). The response variable

Hi everyone, I've run into a bit of strange problem with implicit vs explicit printing and the call stack. I've included an example at the bottom of this email. The basic problem is that I have an S3 object with a print method. When the object is implicitly printed (ie. typed directly into the console) the function arguments in the call stack are exploded out to their actual values,

Dear R-users, I use the survsplit function in the survival package to change my data into counting-process format and the transformed format is as follow: (a) start stop event DP age .... 0 5 0 1 20 5 10 0 1 20 10 25 1 1 20 looking at the above three entries that belong to the same person, if an event happen at

Hi everyone, I have a data frame that looks *sort of* like this: name <- letters[1:5] signal.1 <- c("12", "bad signal", "noise", "10", "X") length.signal.1 <- 5:9 intensity.signal.1 <- 3:7 signal.2 <- c("13", "noise", "19.2", "X", "V") length.signal.2 <- 2:6 intensity.signal.2

Colleagues, I am fitting an Emax model using nls. The code is: START <- list(EMAX=INITEMAX, EFFECT=INITEFFECT, C50=INITC50) CONTROL <- list(maxiter=1000, warnOnly=T) #FORMULA <- as.formula(YVAR ~ EMAX - EFFECT * XVAR^GAMMA / (XVAR^GAMMA + C50^GAMMA)) ## alternate version of formula FORMULA <- as.formula(YVAR ~ EMAX - EFFECT / (1 + (C50/XVAR)^GAMMA)) FIT <-

Danardono <daodao99 at student.umu.se> wrote: > > While waiting for 2.1, for those who need function[s] for this > survival-splitting business, as I do, this 'survcut' function below > might be helpful. > It is not an elegant nor efficient function but it works, at least for > some examples below. > Ditto the following, for the case where there are multiple

I need to do a somewhat complex rearrangement of an existing dataframe that involves an "on-the-fly" conditional summary as well. I've tried to make the example as simple as possible. Code to produce the object being acted on is at the end of the message. I hope this isn't too much for a single posting. Any guidance will be much appreciated. The input example looks like

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Since the samba-docs mailing list is closed, I figured this was the best place to post this. I believe there's a typo in example 19.2 ("Overriding global CUPS settings for one printer") of the official Samba HOWTO collection. The "print command" parameter in the [special_printer] section contains several echo commands,

Dear Rusers, My question is about "recode variables". First, i'd like to say something about the idea of recoding: My dataset have three variables:type,soiltem and airtem,which means grass type, soil temperature and air temperature. As we all known, the change of air temperature is greater than soil temperature,so the values in those two different temperaturemay represent different

Hi, I experience surprisingly large timing differences for the multiplication of matrices of the same dimension. An example is given below. How can this be explained? I posted the question on Stackoverflow: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58886111/r-why-is-matrix-product-slower-when-matrix-has-very-small-values Somebody could reproduce the behavior but I did not get any useful explanations

##I want to remove the rows where the row sums are zero and this is as far as I have gotten ffg <- (structure(list(CD = c(0, 0, 0, 0, 3.125, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1.6, 3.125, 0, 0, 6.25, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 3.125, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1.6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1.6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 3.125, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,

I can get this summary of a model that I am running: summary(myprobit) Call: glm(formula = Response_Slot ~ trial_no, family = binomial(link = "probit"), data = neg_data, na.action = na.pass) Deviance Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -0.9528 -0.8934 -0.8418 1.4420 1.6026 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)

The pretty picture that I saw at: http://chartsgraphs.wordpress.com/2009/02/09/r-panel-chart-beats-excel-chart/#more-1096 inspired me to try something similar. The code that I wrote is: ------snipsnip--------------------------------------------------------------------- M <- structure(list(date = structure(c(13634, 13665, 13695, 13726, 13757, 13787, 13818, 13848, 13879, 13910, 13939, 13970,

I'm using a very long irregular time-series of air temperature and relative humidity of this kind (this is an extract only) its.format("% Y%d%m %X) > base T H 20020601 12.00.00 27.1 47 20020601 15.00.00 29.1 39 20020601 18.00.00 27.4 39 20020601 21.00.00 24.0 40 20020602 0.00.00 22.0 73 20020602 3.00.00 19.2 49 20020602 6.00.00 19.5 74 20020602