similar to: joining data based upon a moving time window?

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches similar to: "joining data based upon a moving time window?"

2010 May 18
2
automate curve drawing on nls() object
Hi, I would like to use the curve() function to draw the predicted curve from an nls() object. for example: dd<-read.table("dd.txt",sep='\t',header=T,row.names=1) obj<-nls(y~c+(d-c)/(1+(x/e)^b),data=dd,start=list(b=-1, c=0, d=100, e=150)) coef(obj) b c d e -1.1416422 0.6987028 102.8613176 135.9373131
2011 Feb 11
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7953] New: -x flag prevents symlink on source filesystem from overwriting dest dir
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7953 Summary: -x flag prevents symlink on source filesystem from overwriting dest dir Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at
2012 Jun 25
2
Fractional Factorial - Wrong values using lm-function
Hello. I'm a new user of R, and I have a question regarding the use of aov and lm-functions. I'm doing a fractional factorial experiment at our production site, and I need to familiarize myself with the analysis before I conduct the experiment. I've been working my way through the examples provided at http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/pri/section4/pri472.htm
2018 May 30
0
[ovirt-users] Re: Gluster problems, cluster performance issues
[Adding gluster-users back] Nothing amiss with volume info and status. Can you check the agent.log and broker.log - will be under /var/log/ovirt-hosted-engine-ha/ Also the gluster client logs - under /var/log/glusterfs/rhev-data-center-mnt-glusterSD<volume>.log On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Jim Kusznir <jim at palousetech.com> wrote: > I believe the gluster data store for
2018 May 30
1
[ovirt-users] Re: Gluster problems, cluster performance issues
Adding Ravi to look into the heal issue. As for the fsync hang and subsequent IO errors, it seems a lot like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497156 and Paolo Bonzini from qemu had pointed out that this would be fixed by the following commit: commit e72c9a2a67a6400c8ef3d01d4c461dbbbfa0e1f0 Author: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> Date: Wed Jun 21 16:35:46 2017
2006 Mar 31
1
logging problem
Yep I tried those two options, and nothing... Even if the pre-user conf files have a log file in the same directory, which I touch before trying, messages keep going to syslog... I tried with 666 permissions on rsyncd.log too just to make sure... The following is one of the user's conf file, hope theres a clue. Thanks! log file = /home/pluto/rsyncd.log <<< This is the problem!!
2018 Jun 01
0
[ovirt-users] Re: Gluster problems, cluster performance issues
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:16 AM, Jim Kusznir <jim at palousetech.com> wrote: > I've been back at it, and still am unable to get more than one of my > physical nodes to come online in ovirt, nor am I able to get more than the > two gluster volumes (storage domains) to show online within ovirt. > > In Storage -> Volumes, they all show offline (many with one brick down,
2018 May 30
1
[ovirt-users] Re: Gluster problems, cluster performance issues
I've been back at it, and still am unable to get more than one of my physical nodes to come online in ovirt, nor am I able to get more than the two gluster volumes (storage domains) to show online within ovirt. In Storage -> Volumes, they all show offline (many with one brick down, which is correct: I have one server off) However, in Storage -> domains, they all show down (although
2018 May 30
2
[ovirt-users] Re: Gluster problems, cluster performance issues
The profile seems to suggest very high latencies on the brick at ovirt1.nwfiber.com:/gluster/brick1/engine ovirt2.* shows decent numbers. Is everything OK with the brick on ovirt1? Are the bricks of engine volume on both these servers identical in terms of their config? -Krutika On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Jim Kusznir <jim at palousetech.com> wrote: > Hi: > > Thank you. I
2018 May 30
0
[ovirt-users] Re: Gluster problems, cluster performance issues
Hi all again: I'm now subscribed to gluster-users as well, so I should get any replies from that side too. At this point, I am seeing acceptable (although slower than I expect) performance much of the time, with periodic massive spikes in latency (occasionally so bad as to cause ovirt to detect a engine bad health status). Often, if I check the logs just then, I'll see those call traces
2004 May 10
5
R versus SAS: lm performance
Hello, A collegue of mine has compared the runtime of a linear model + anova in SAS and S+. He got the same results, but SAS took a bit more than a minute whereas S+ took 17 minutes. I've tried it in R (1.9.0) and it took 15 min. Neither machine run out of memory, and I assume that all machines have similar hardware, but the S+ and SAS machines are on windows whereas the R machine is Redhat