similar to: "local({})" documentation?

Ok asked this earlier with no response so I will phrase it a different way. I am sure someone had to deal with this and there is a "best way." I want to let Asterisk make the decision on best path based on local exchange - xxx-yyy - where xxx is one of my local area codes and xxx is exchange designator. The problem is that the list is rather large. Maybe 50-100. The idea is that I can

Hello list, I tried to set up a folder on our fileserver domain member, so I can deploy software for users' machines, but is not working. If I put the software inside "netlogon" it installs correctly. \\172.16.1.7\storage\programs Auth Users - read & execute, list folder contents, read and write Do I need other permissions? -- Elias Pereira

Hey Luke, thanks for the help!!! It's working now!!! God bless you and your family!! :D Remember that GPOs need to run as the context of either the computer or the > user. Computers typically do not have access to many folders on a file > server, even as "Everyone". That is why the NETLOGON folder works. > > If you're deploying as a USER configuration, then it

Hello Morillo, I have reviewed the steps described again. In fact, I had already done this several times. :D Even so, it does not map. The shared folder is mapped, but the printer is not. On windows 7 it works correctly. On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 12:33 PM MORILLO Jordi via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello Elias, > > Printing is working well for us. > Carrefully

Which GPO? Computer or User Configuration? Remember that GPOs need to run as the context of either the computer or the user. Computers typically do not have access to many folders on a file server, even as "Everyone". That is why the NETLOGON folder works. If you're deploying as a USER configuration, then it should run as the context of the user, meaning the Everyone permission

hello guys, In my tests lab did the migration ldap base of the old samba3 to Samba4 ADCD. It's possible to migrate directories and files from users of the old samba3 to Samba4 ADDC? -- Elias Pereira

Hi Elias, > I thought it worked, but after I uninstalled the software that I deployed > via user scope, it did not reinstall. I selected the "Redeploy application" > option, but it also did not work. The user scope GPO are run with the privileges and access tokens of the logged on user, so the user have local admin rights for install and need access rights to the share you

On 22/12/14 17:47, Elias Pereira wrote: > And now, I run the command "samba-tool user list" and the result is as > follows: > > *# samba-tool user list* > *ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb* > *Could not find machine account in secrets database: Failed to fetch > machine account password from secrets.ldb: Could not find entry to match > filter:

> > Simple answer: > Administrator, No > Domain Admins, Yes Ok. It was already that way. root at fileserver:/etc/samba# getent group ... domain admins:x:10004: domain users:x:10000: dap:x:10003: dti:x:10001: For some reason with the administrator user is not working, I put my user as domain admin and include him as a member of unix and now I can access the security tab.

For a simple call file like Channel: Zap/g1/XXXXXXX RetryTime: 60 WaitTime: 30 Context: from-file Extension: s Priority: 1 I noticed that s@from-file started to execute regardless of the state of the outgoing call. Is this supposed to be? So far I can only set a Wait() in the local leg and hope the remote party picks up soon enough. I thought call file extension will start execution only

> > Just a thought, is dhcpcd5 installed ? No. Does this happen on the XEN Server of Client (guest OS). If Xen, which xen version? xen 7.0.0 The command cat lan-dev-$(ip route | grep default |awk '{ print $5 }').network shows nothing. Do I need to create this file? His content is just my interface. Ex: eth0? On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:54 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba

The saga continues... I've spent a whole day with log level 5 and 7 and no error. All I have to do is return the log to the default and the error reappears. I monitored the "LDAP Query: Duration", but I didn't notice any crashes in the queries. I don't know if it's a long time, but some queries took 1.5s. Is there anything else I can do? On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at

Hello Andrew, 1. What is the explanation for the fact that when the log level is set to 5 or 7, the NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT error does not appear, but when it is at the default log level, it does? Another point I've noticed before is that when I run the command "samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --reset-well-known-acls --fix --yes" (*Checked 15337 objects (0 errors)*), and in another

1.5 seconds is pretty long, I would look into what those queries are. I would also look into repeated queries, sometimes these things are clients stuck in a loop where they don't complete because they expect some termination condition. Andrew Bartlett On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 09:25 -0300, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > The saga continues... > I've spent a whole day with log level 5

Hello L.P.H van Belle Your apt are offline? I am getting error messages while updating my distro and when I access the https://apt.van-belle.nl/ the following message appears: "Site: Unknown This site you entered is not known by this server. or did you used an ipaddress to access this server ! Try again with a correct hostname" -- Elias Pereira

Hello guys, I'm testing one notebook with windows 10 and GPO for printer deploy didn't work. I read some things about this error and basically a windows KB error. But, the KB mentioned in my reads didn't have in this windows 10 version. Any idea? Version: windows 10 1909 18363.657 -- Elias Pereira

Hello Andrew, What's the explanation for when the log level is set to 5, the error NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT doesn't appear, but when it's at the default log level, it does? On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:33?AM Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote: > hi Andrew, thanks for the help!!! > > It seems to me the LDAP process being busy would be the root cause here. >>

On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 14:21 -0300, Elias Pereira wrote: > Hello?Andrew, > > 1. What is the explanation for the fact that when the log level is > set to 5 or 7, the NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT error does not appear, but > when it is at the default log level, it does? I don't have an explanation for this, sorry. ?Have you looked into the 1.5 second queries, what is sending them and

Hello, We have samba 4.1.17 installed via debian package and would like to install the latest version 4.5 from source. It's possible to perform this upgrade over the packages? If so, what the paths used in the installation via debian packages? -- Elias Pereira

Many thanks to Dr Yu for updating Rmpi for R 2.6.0, and for starting to make the changes to support Open MPI. I have just built the updated Debian package of Rmpi (i.e. r-cran-rmpi) under R 2.6.0 but I cannot convince myself yet whether it works or not. Simple tests work. E.g. on my Debian testing box, with Rmpi installed directly using Open Mpi 1.2.3-2 (from Debian) and using 'r' from