similar to: rank of Matrix

> sessionInfo() R version 2.13.1 (2011-07-08) Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin9.8.0/x86_64 (64-bit) locale: [1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8 attached base packages: [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base other attached packages: [1] Matrix_0.999375-50 lattice_0.19-30 loaded via a namespace (and not attached): [1] grid_2.13.1

Dear list, I have been working with the MatrixModels package quite a bit this week, and it is proving to be extremely valuable for my current work (I am working with several factors with many levels, leading to a sparse model matrix). However, as my knowledge of statistical theory leaves much to be desired, there are certain aspects of model evaluation etc that I am having trouble with. Has

Hello, I am trying to build a large size identity matrix using diag(). The size is around 23000 and I've tried diag(23000), that took a long time. Since I have to use this operation several times in my program, the running time is too long to be tolerable. Are there any alternative for diag(N)? Thanks Cheers, yct [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I am having problem building R 2.10, and it does not seem anyone else is having a similar problem... My system information: uname -m = x86_64 uname -r = 2.6.31-ARCH uname -s = Linux gcc (GCC) 4.4.1 icc (ICC) 11.0 20081105 The first problem I encounter seems to be with icc and wctype.h during ./configure. export CC="icc -std=c99" export CXX=icpc export OBJC="icc

Le 22/01/2018 ? 17:40, Keith O'Hara a ?crit?: > This behavior is noted in the qr documentation, no? > > rank - the rank of x as computed by the decomposition(*): always full rank in the LAPACK case. For a me a "full rank matrix" is a matrix the rank of which is indeed min(nrow(A), ncol(A)) but here the meaning of "always is full rank" is somewhat confusing. Does it

Hi, I have a sparse Matrix (kronecker product of spline design matrices), and I need to multiply each row by a number to get another matrix. If the matrix is A and the numbers are stored in a vector k, with plain vanilla matrices I would do A*k But when using the Matrix package (class of A is "dgCMatrix"), I get the warning "coercing sparse to dense matrix for arithmetic".

Hola buenas noches, tengo un problema bastante gordo. ¿A alguno le ha dejado de funcionar las funciones pamer.fnc y mcp.fnc con la nueva versión de R? La semana pasada formatee el ordenador y ahora scripts antiguos no funcionan. La cuestión es que me precupa que no funcione el ejemplo de tutorial del autor. Os dejo un script que debería de funcionar y no lo hace

Le 23/01/2018 ? 08:47, Martin Maechler a ?crit?: >>>>>> Serguei Sokol <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> >>>>>> on Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:57:47 +0100 writes: > > Le 22/01/2018 ? 17:40, Keith O'Hara a ?crit?: > >> This behavior is noted in the qr documentation, no? > >> > >> rank - the rank of x as

Dear all, Rank of a matrix depends on which factors? Only on rows or coumns? or both ? If there is a collinearlity in the variables ( columns ) does it effects the rank? > X<-matrix((rnorm(10000)),50) > dim(X) [1] 50 200 > qr(X)$rank [1] 50 > X[,2]<-X[,30] > qr(X)$rank [1] 50 > X[10,]<-X[7,] > qr(X)$rank [1] 49 Thanks Alex [[alternative HTML

Dear list, I am trying to plot a radial dendrogram using the ape package, which requires my data to be of class 'phylo'. Currently I have my dendrogram stored as an object of class 'dendrogram' which was produced from an outside bit of C code, but was made into an object of class 'igraph.eigenc' and converted to a dendrogram using 'as.dendrogram()' from the igraph

Dear list, I have been comparing the outputs of two packages for latent class regression, namely 'flexmix', and 'mmlcr'. What I have noticed is that the flexmix package appears to come up with a much better fit than the mmlcr package (based on logLik, AIC, BIC, and visual inspection). Has anyone else observed such behaviour? Has anyone else been successful in using the mmlcr

I mistakenly left a write in "/tmp" in the rockchalk package (version 1.8.109) that I uploaded last Friday. Kurt H wrote and asked me to fix today. While uploading a new one, I became aware of a problem I had not seen. The version I uploaded last Friday, 1.8.109, has OK status on all platforms except r-release-windows-ix86+x86_64. I get OK on oldrel-windows and also on devel-windows.

Dear list, I'm wondering if anyone can help me calculate the deviance of either a zeroinfl or hurdle model from package pscl? Even if someone could point me to the correct formula for calculating the deviance, I could do the rest on my own. I am trying to calculate a pseudo-R-squared measure based on the R^{2}_{DEV} of [1], so I need to be able to calculate the deviance of the full and null

Hi, we have installed R-2.8.1 using the current pgi compiler (8.0.2) for AMD64 on a SLES9 system. When I try to install "Matrix" everything is fine until the last step. make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/R.INSTALL.TW3399/Matrix/src/AMD' pgCC -L/usr/lib64 -L/usr/X11R6/lib64 -pgf90libs -o Matrix.so CHMfactor.o Csparse.o TMatrix_as.o Tsparse.o init.o Mutils.o chm_common.o

64-bit R-2.12.0 was installed on Sun SPARC Solaris 10. Compiler used is solstudio12.2. Attached is the configure script. I then tried to install a recommended package called Matrix. The compilation failed with the following messages, ....... CC -library=stlport4 -G -L/opt/csw/lib/sparcv9 -L/opt/solstudio12.2/prod/lib/v9 -o Matrix.so CHMfactor.o Csparse.o TMatrix_as.o Tsparse.o init.o Mutils.o

Hello list, Has anyone had any luck creating an M-step driver for negative binomial regression for use with package flexmix? I've had a look here: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/flexmix/vignettes/flexmix-intro.pdf as well as poking around in the flexmix source, but I haven't had much luck getting anything to work. I can't figure out how to a) come up with an initial estimate

Dear list, I posted essentially this same question to the r-sig-geo mailing list last week with no response :( Unfortunately I am no closer to reaching a solution, so I now post it here (with some clarifications) in the hope that someone following this list might have an answer for me: Has anyone had much experience with spatial interaction (or gravity) models, specifically in the form of

Dear Developers, motivated by the new Sun Studio checks I compiled R-devel and several of our packages with Sun Studio 12 on Fedora x64. Everything worked fine and R-devel runs, with the exception of package Matrix where compilation crashes with the following message. The error occurs during building of the recommended packages and also if Matrix is compiled separately: [...] CC -G -lCstd

2017-06-22 20:31 GMT+02:00 Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>: > > > On 22.06.2017 20:09, I?aki ?car wrote: >> >> 2017-06-22 19:49 GMT+02:00 Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>: >>> >>> On 22.06.2017 17:11, Bernd Funovits wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I

Hello list, I am not sure if the terminology that I am using here is widely used, however, I provide an example in the hopes that my problem will become clear. My basic problem is that I am unsure of how to 'constrain' my model estimates to reproduce the aggregate (by factor levels) observed dependent variable for a negative.binomial model. I realize this sounds rather vague, so I provide