similar to: plotting several ROC curves on the same graph

Hello I am trying to make a graph of 10 different lines built each from 4 different segments and to add a darker line that will represent the average of all graphs - all in the same plot.Actually each line is a ROC plot The code I'm using for plotting one line is as follows: logit.roc.plot <- function(r, title="ROC curve") { old.par <- par(no.readonly = TRUE);

Dear R-philes, I am plotting ROC curves for several cross-validation runs of a classifier (using the function below). In addition to the average AUC, I am interested in obtaining a confidence interval for the average AUC. Is there a straightforward way to do this via the ROCR package? plot_roc_curve <- function(roc.dat, plt.title) { #print(str(vowel.ROC)) pred <-

Hello all, Trying to get this piece of code to work on my data set. It is from http://www.itc.nl/personal/rossiter. logit.roc <- function(model, steps=100) { field.name <- attr(attr(terms(formula(model)), "factors"), "dimnames")[[1]][1] eval(parse(text=paste("tmp <- ", ifelse(class(model$data) == "data.frame", "model$data$",

I use ROCR to plot multiple runs' performance. Using the sample code as example: # plot ROC curves for several cross-validation runs (dotted # in grey), overlaid by the vertical average curve and boxplots # showing the vertical spread around the average. data(ROCR.xval) pred <- prediction(ROCR.xval$predictions, ROCR.xval$labels) perf <- performance(pred,"tpr","fpr")

Hi, I'm trying to set up a prediction software, now i testing the performance of my method, so i need to calculate a ROC curve, specially auc, cut-off, sens and spec, i just looking at ROCH package, but it's a mass for me, i'm not a math guy and I'm getting lost Could any of you recommend me an easy-to-use package to do this task? i just have a list of positive/negative samples

Dear Guru's, Is there a package (R of course) with programs for diagnostics - roc, sens , spec, kappa etc? Best wishes Fredrik L

Hello, I am afraid I do not fully understand all intricacies of programming in lattice plots. In the code below I try to plot an ROC curve, following R-news 4(1). When I condition on the variable 'group' I get the error message below, when I plot the curve for all data (i.e., y ~ pred.prob), I get the plot I want. Can someone point out why conditioning gives that message? Thanks, Ruud

Hola! Tengo que hacer una curva ROC com unos datos que obtuve de hacer una macro de excel y aplicar unas reglas, y basicamente tengo que a partir de la variacion del tiempo y la velocidad del barco obtengo diferentes porcentajes de true positives (TP) y false positives (FP) y con eso deberia de construir una curva ROC. Dada mi ignorância en este tema, no se muy bien por donde empezar , estuve

hello, I am using the ROC package to evaluate predictive models I have successfully plot the ROC curve, however ?is there anyway to obtain the value of operating point=optimal threshold value (i.e. the nearest point of the curve to the top-left corner of the axes)? thank you very much, jose daniel anadon area de ecologia universidad miguel hernandez espa?a

I might be missing something but I thought that AUC was a measure for comparing ROC curves, so there is nothing else needed to "compare" them. The larger AUC is the higher correlation of 2 variables compared. No other measures or calculations are needed. Jarek Tuszynski -----Original Message----- From: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch [mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] On

> On Jun 26, 2017, at 11:40 AM, Brian Smith <bsmith030465 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I was trying to draw some ROC curves (prediction of case/control status), > but seem to be getting a somewhat jagged plot. Can I do something that > would 'smooth' it somewhat? Most roc curves seem to have many incremental > changes (in x and y directions), but my plot

Hi, I was trying to draw some ROC curves (prediction of case/control status), but seem to be getting a somewhat jagged plot. Can I do something that would 'smooth' it somewhat? Most roc curves seem to have many incremental changes (in x and y directions), but my plot only has 4 or 5 steps even though there are 22 data points. Should I be doing something differently? How can I provide a

Dear all, I try to compare the performances of several parameters to diagnose lameness in dogs. I have several ROC curves from the same dataset. I plotted the ROC curves and calculated AUC with the ROCR package. I would like to compare the AUC. I used the following program I found on R-help archives : From: Bernardo Rangel Tura Date: Thu 16 Dec 2004 - 07:30:37 EST

Hello, I am making some use of ROC curve analysis. I find much help on the mailing list, and I have used the Area Under the Curve (AUC) functions from the ROC function in the bioconductor project... http://www.bioconductor.org/repository/release1.5/package/Source/ ROC_1.0.13.tar.gz However, I read here... http://www.medcalc.be/manual/mpage06-13b.php "The 95% confidence interval for

Hi, Dear all R users: Does someone know whether R can calculate the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves? I didn't find it from the packages. Thanks a lot. --- Xin

Hi, Is there any package or code to compare and display correlated ROC curves in R? Thanks, Reza [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear List,   I am new to ROC analysis and the package ROCR. I want to compute the confidence intervals of sensitivity and specificity for a given cutoff value. I have used the following to calculate sensitivity and specificity:   data(ROCR.simple) pred <- prediction(ROCR.simple$predictions, ROCR.simple$labels)   se.sp <- function (cutoff, performance) {     sens <-

The name conflicts in Epi and ROC packages (2 'ROC' functions are the problem) cause the following code to work once, but not twice: library(MASS); data(cats); x = cats[,2] y = ifelse(cats[,1]=='F',0,1) library(Epi); ROC(x,y,grid=0)$AUC library(ROC); AUC(rocdemo.sca(y, x, dxrule.sca)) What is the standard way of resolving name conflicts? Ask maintainers to resolve

Dear all, Some functions like 'ROC(Epi)' can be used to perform ROC analyssi, but it needs us to specify the fitting model in the argument. Now i have got the predicted p-values (0,1) for the 0/1 response variable using some other approach, see the following example dataset: id mark predict.pvalue 1 1 0.927 2 0 0.928 3 1 0.928 ..................

Hi, I was lately debugging parts of my 'colAUC' function in caTools package, and in a process looked into other packages for calculating Areas Under ROC Curves (AUC). To my surprise I found at least 6 other functions: * wilcox.test * AUC from ROC package, * performance from ROCR package, * auROC from limma package, * ROC from Epi package, * roc.area from verification