similar to: removing data randomly based on previous observations

On 4/5/23 10:31, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Hi! > The crash occurs inside libldap. > Aki Thanks Aki, It was against openldap 2.6.3. Subsequently, I tried openldap 2.6.4 which is in nixpkgs unstable, but I wasn't able to test this because of an issue at the Portunus/openldap end of things. I think I'm out of time for experimenting with ldap for now, but I may come back around to this

Some of my users have to type in their password when their shares are mounted, or when they want to print. Some of them simply login at boot time and are covered for the entire session. The version I am running is Version 1.9.18p8. The OS I am using is Solaris 2.6, on a Sun Ultra. Here is the info that I think is relevant: >From smb.conf: [argus] comment = Art's Group Share path

Honestly, I'm probably not the best person to ask this. I really just deal with network performance issues. You should try the OpenSSH development group. I've cc:'d that group on this message. However, a quick look at the code shows that you'd only be getting that warning if both CUSTOM_SYS_TUN_OPEN and SSH_TUN_OPENBSD are not defined. Grep on the first define we find the

Hello, I want to have the x-axis title of my plot in 2 lines, centered: experiment 1: log2(Ratio H/L) I know that in principle that works with '\n'. However, I am also using the 'substitute' command for my axis title. However, it does not make a new line. What I have so far: logbase <- 2 test <- "bait" cellline <- "cellline" plot(

Hello, I am having trouble specifying a suitable nlme model. My data structure is described by gd <- groupedData(ppath ~ lcut | exp, outer = ~ bait, inner = ~ weight, data = d) i.e. the response (ppath) of several subjects (sub) was measured at levels of a continuous variable (lcut). Subjects were given either of one level of a factor (bait), and all subjects were measured at two levels

I have been playing with the cookbook type of tutorials building a fish tournament scoring piece and am having a bit of a problem with a DB field called "points" in my "catch" table that is not input by the user but is calulated based on a "size" field that is input by the user. I have the following in my catch_controller.db def new @catch = Catch.new @fish =

> On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: > >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com <mailto:ruiu at google.com>> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Mehdi

> On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: > >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com <mailto:ruiu at google.com>> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Mehdi

Dear R community A few weeks ago, I uploaded a small text file called R-and-octave.txt to the contributed docs section of CRAN. This file details octave/matlab commands and their (near) equivalents in R (Matlab is a widely-used high-level graphics/mathematics tool and octave a free clone). Someone has just pointed out to me that I never announced its existence to anyone, hence this email (I

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 10:06 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec

I made a boo boo in my config and put in this rule #PPTP DNAT net:213.67.241.162/217.209.46.204/32 loc:192.168.221.200 tcp 1723 DNAT net:213.67.241.162/32,217.209.46.204/32 loc:192.168.221.200 47 - And the the following happened.. and I wonder why it didn''t complain? I am sure I am just misunderstanding some doc

On 05/01/2020 01:40 PM, Wyatt Childers via llvm-dev wrote: > I agree with everything said here, to me this seems like the most sane option. It seems like this approach could also be tested at a smaller scale if there are concerns about deleting a repo, to see if there is any observable effect. > > While I haven't performed this particular trick on Github, based on my experience

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:02:57AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Wed, June 15, 2016 9:17 am, Warren Young wrote: > >> > >> Nowadays it's quite easy to get normal ssl certificates for free. E.g. > > > > Today, I would prefer Let???s Encrypt: > > > > https://letsencrypt.org/ > > > > It is philosophically aligned with the open

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> >> wrote: >>

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sean Silva via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Rui Ueyama" <ruiu at google.com> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 9:59:37 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] LLD status update and performance chart > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Rui

In consequence of this thread I went looking for a probe script that would send individualized email messages to each subscriber of a mailman list and found none. Does such a thing in fact exist? It seems to me that this would be an invaluable tool in tracking down which subscriber is the bot-bait. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Sean Silva via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > *To: *"Rui Ueyama" <ruiu at google.com> > *Cc: *"llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > *Sent: *Tuesday, December 13, 2016 9:59:37 PM >