similar to: Compatibility with R for Windows 2.12.2

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Philip Reames" <listmail at philipreames.com> > To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 5:34:36 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RFC: PerfGuide for frontend authors > > The first version of this document is now live: >

> On Feb 27, 2015, at 3:58 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Philip Reames" <listmail at philipreames.com> >> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 5:34:36 PM >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RFC: PerfGuide for frontend

Hi all - I've been working on a lite ORM and database abstraction package for R. Formatting complex queries by hand has always been an error-prone hassle, so I've tried to do away with that as much as possible, instead, using R objects to represent elements of a database system (statements, clauses, operators, functions, fields, tables, etc.). R5 classes have made the development of this

I'd like to propose that we create a new Performance Guide document. The target of this document will be frontend authors, not necessarily LLVM contributors. The content will be a collection of items a frontend author might want to know about how to generate LLVM IR which will optimize well. Some ideas on topics that might be worthwhile: - Prefer sext over zext when value is known to be

Hi, I'm looking into purchasing a few Dell Servers and installing it with CentOS 4.1. It comes with this software called the the Dell OpenManage Software Kit for PowerEdge that allows for remote monitoring of the servers. Has anyone out there successfully installed the OpenManage s/ware? Is it compatible with CentOS 4.1? Any opinions / feedback is welcome. Thanks. Best Regards, Andrew

Dear R users, besides the current R 2.14 I would like to install a second version of R (2.12.2) on my Ubuntu system. The current version is easily installed as a precompiled package from Cran but I am heavily fighting with the older version. I tried to follow the instructions here: http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-admin.html Unfortunately I got totally confused by all the different

Hello to all. I'm trying to implement a simple register allocator using graph colouring (I know, everyone has already done that :-)) and I'm also using LLVM 3.4 from master branch. The algorithm I'm using is based on the one described on the "Modern Compiler Implementation in C". My implementation is totally experimental and doesn't aim to be fast, eficient or even

On Sep 17, 2013, at 5:15 AM, Leandro Santiago <leandrosansilva at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello to all. I'm trying to implement a simple register allocator using graph colouring (I know, everyone has already done that :-)) and I'm also using LLVM 3.4 from master branch. > > The algorithm I'm using is based on the one described on the "Modern Compiler Implementation in

I installed a custom package which needs to know its own location on the disk. (It runs an executable that is included in the package.) In version 2.11.1 the .Library command gave me the necessary information. It returned the path C:\Program Files\R\R-2.11.1\library. I have noticed that in the 2.12.2 newly installed libraries are installed to something like C:\Documents and Settings\user\My

Hi R-team, While using R 2.12.2, I came across a problem that it doesn't have RPostgreSQL package in the list of "install packages". As my original code was written in R 2.11.1, I could use the RPostgreSQL package. I am moving to R 2.12.2 to use the newly added package "xtable" in newer version R 2.12.2. Please help me to solve this problem and tell me if the RPostgreSQL

Hi, Using Chaitin's approach, removing a copy via coalescing could expose more opportunities for coalescing. So he would iteratively rebuild the interference graph and check for more opportunities. Chaitin was also careful to make sure that the source and destination of a copy didn't interfere unnecessarily (because of the copy alone); that is, his approach to interference was very

The phi instruction is irrelevant; just the way I think about things. The question is if the allocator believes that t0 and t2 interfere. Perhaps the coalescing example was too simple. In the general case, we can't coalesce without a notion of interference. My worry is that looking at interference by ranges of instruction numbers leads to inaccuracies when a range is introduced by a copy.

opensuse 10/find / samba-3.0.20b-3.3 I'm trying to change directory permissions on a share so all users can modify files in the share and when I do as suggested in Ch15 of Samba Howto the following happens $ find `directory_name' -type d -exec chown nobody:users {}\; find: missing argument to `-exec' Chris Boyd Systems Engineer USIT 19-21 Aston Quay Dublin 2 Ireland Tel: +353 1

> The underlying liveness datastructure is a list of ranges where each vreg is alive > (ranges in terms of instructions numbered). I remember a couple of later linear scan > papers describing the same thing (Traub et.al. being the first if I remember correctly). > That should be as accurate as you can get in terms of liveness information. It depends on the details. For example, given

Dear List, I'm trying to figure out some best practice way with respect to the naming conventions when building own packages. I'd like to minimize the risk of choosing function names that might interfere with those of other packages (both available ones and those yet to come). I came up with following alternatives 1. Prefixing the actual names (e.g. myPkgfoo() instead of foo()): pretty

> On Sep 10, 2018, at 5:25 PM, Matthias Braun <mbraun at apple.com> wrote: > > > >> On Sep 10, 2018, at 5:11 PM, Preston Briggs <preston.briggs at gmail.com <mailto:preston.briggs at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> The phi instruction is irrelevant; just the way I think about things. >> The question is if the allocator believes that t0 and t2

On Monday 27 August 2007 15:13, Evan Cheng wrote: > 1. typedef std::set<const LiveInterval *> IntervalSet; > Please use SmallPtrSet instead. Ok. > 2. > + virtual void mergeIntervals(const LiveInterval &a, > + const LiveInterval &b, > + const MachineInstr &copy) {}; > > I find the name

I've set the path for each user in pdbedit and created a login script with drive mapping etc etc The network drives aren't being mapped when I login each user: smb.conf [global] printcap name = cups cups options = raw map to guest = Bad User # include = /etc/samba/dhcp.conf logon path = \\%L\profiles\.msprofile logon home = \\%L\%U\.9xprofile

Yes, I quite liked the things I've read about the PBQP allocator. Given what the hardware folks have to go through to get 1% improvements in scalar code, spending 20% (or whatever) compile time (under control of a flag) seems like nothing. And falling back on "average code" is a little disingenuous. People looking for performance don't care about average code; they care about

I''ve checked the Rails documentation but find no mention of link_to ''external url'' or equivalent. Does rails have a built in method to do this? thanks -Lindsay -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.