similar to: summing values for specific variables

Hi, I would like to sum some specific columns in my matrix- for example, my matrix looks like this: [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [1,] 1 NA NA NA NA [2,] 2 1 NA 1 NA [3,] 3 2 1 2 1 [4,] 4 3 2 3 2 [5,] NA NA NA 4 3 [6,] NA NA NA 5 NA I would like to find the sum of the first two columns, the second two columns and

Hello, I have a data set that needs to be combined so that rows are summed by a group based on a certain variable. I'm pretty sure rowsum() or rowsums() can do this but it's difficult for me to figure out how it will work for my data based on the examples I've read. My data are structured like this: Plot SizeClass Stems 12 Class3 1 12 Class4

Am Mittwoch, den 06.05.2020, 10:26 -0400 schrieb Ilia Mirkin: > [please keep list cc'd in your replies] > > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 10:15 AM Milan Bu?ka <milan.buska at gmail.com> wrote: > > [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.6.10-zotac (root at saux) (gcc version 9.3.0 (SAUX Aarch64)) #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue May 5 22:16:40 CEST 2020 > > [ 0.000000] Machine model: NVIDIA

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1417 Bug ID: 1417 Summary: mapping to adjacent ranges is causing error in kernel 5.6, kernel 5.5 works fine Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5

Hi, I have a problem with the ordered probit model -polr function (library MASS). My independent variables are countinuos. I am not able to understand two main points: a) how to calculate marginal effects b) how to calculate the relative importance of each independent variables If required i will attach my model output. Thanks Franco

Hi everyone, I am trying to apply linear regression to adjacent columns in a matrix (i.e. col1~col2; col3~col4; etc.). The columns in my matrix come with identifiers at the top of each column, but when I try to use these identifiers to reference the columns in the regression function using rollapply(), the columns are not recognised and the regression breaks down. Is there a more robust way to

Hopefully this is an easy question.... I''m using a leaf router (bearing) running shorewall. Three interfaces net, loc, and dmz. Only one computer in the dmz and its being proxy arp''d. External and internal (net and loc) can reach the dmz but the dmz cannot reach the isp''s gateway and beyond, but can reach a system adjacent to the firewall.

Hi everyone, Here is the story. We are running Redhat Enterprise Linux 4, and were using Dovecot .99.x . At one point, we chose to switch from mbox to maildir (and still use Dovecot). After the switchover our users reported a bug when using Thunderbird: "A new behavior that I have observed a couple of times is that the new IMAP server confuses email headers with content. E.g., I have an

On 2/12/2016 7:23 AM, Bruce Hoult via llvm-dev wrote: > I haven't seen what you are doing, but if I was writing a back end for > the 6502, I'd lie to LLVM and describe RAM page 0 as being the real > registers, and A, X and Y as being special purpose registers used for > temporaries. How did you get the "(z), x" and "(z, y)" addressing modes to work with

Hi, I have the following sequence: in <- c(0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 2) >From this sequence I would like to get to the following sequence: out <- c(0, 0, 0, 3, 3, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 11, 11, 11, 11, 11, 11, 11, 11, 11, 11, 11, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 2) Basically,

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13582 Bug ID: 13582 Summary: rsync filters containing multiple adjacent slashes aren't reduced to just one slash before matching Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

I know about this param, I configured it and log.smbd, log.nmbd and others are rotated, log.samba is not. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > To: "Lorenzo Milesi" <maxxer at yetopen.it>, "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 7:29:04 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] log.samba

Hi! I'm working on an LLVM back-end for a processor with a stack machine architecture. After experimenting with code generation directly from the LLVM representation, I'm studying the target-independant code generator. As far as I understand, there currently exists a target-independant infrastructure for legalization, instruction selection, scheduling and register allocation. It is clear

>Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 10:41:14 -0400 (EDT) >From: Yan Wang <ywang4@cs.pitt.edu> >Subject: TCFS on FreeBSD > > >I tried to port Transparent Cryptographic File System >(http://www.tcfs.it) OpenBSD version to FreeBSD 4.8, but failed. Has >any one tried this before? How much modification is needed? Any info is >appreciated. > >Thanks, > >Yan > >

> On 10/18/2016 5:06 AM, Nuno Lopes via llvm-dev wrote: >> Another use is, for example, to implement bit-fields: >> a.x = 2 >> becomes: >> %v = load %a >> %v2 = freeze %v ; %v could be uninitialized data (poison) >> %v3 = ... bitmasking... >> store %a, %v3 > > It seems like you're saying that an integer load which touches any >

> The latest Samba version is 4.10.6 and there have been numerous updates > since 4.3.11, but you shouldn't be having the problem you have, so lets > start be you posting your smb.conf Thank you very much. Here it is: [global] server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate realm = domain.lan ldap server require strong auth =

Hi, Can I ask what is the status of load widening. It seems there is no load widening on IR at all. // Paweł On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 1:49 PM Artur Pilipenko via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Philip and I talked about this is person. Given the fact that load > widening in presence of atomics is irreversible transformation we agreed > that we don't want to do

I never thought I’d see the day when someone proposed treating the 6502 like a GPU… —escha > On Feb 12, 2016, at 6:30 AM, Bruce Hoult via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I think it would be sufficient to pick 8 or 16 pairs of zero page locations as the "registers". Who needs 128 registers, unless you're also doing inter-procedural register

Latest Samba4 upgrade (4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.26) broke external LDAP auth probably with the following error: LDAP request size (81) exceeds (0) samba-tool outputs the following when ran: Unknown parameter encountered: "ldap max anonymous request size" Ignoring unknown parameter "ldap max anonymous request size" Unknown parameter encountered: "ldap max authenticated

Hi all I see the rsync source and rsync makes hashing table and search hashing table tag_table to find the index of array struct sum_buf , which is a element of struct sum_struct. According to the source code, variable last_i is used to encourage adjacent matches allowing the RLL coding of the output to work more efficiently. Why last_i makes more efficiency? I can't understanding what