similar to: HLM Model

Dear R-users I am relatively new to R, i hope my many novice questions are welcome. I have problems accessing some objects (specifically the random effects, correlation structure and variance function) from an object of class gls and lme. I used the following models: yah <- gls (outcome~ -1 + as.factor(Trial):as.factor(endpoint)+

Dear R-users I have problems using lme The model i want to fit can be viewed as a two-level bivariate model Two-level bivariate: bivariate (S coded as -1,T coded as 1) endpoint within trial OR It can equivalently be considered as a three-level model.Three-level: endpoint within patient, patient within trial. My code tries to model the levels through a RANDOM statement and a

Hi R users! I am trying to learn some multilevel analysis, but unfortunately i am now very confused. The reason: http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/hlm/seminars/hlm_mlm/mlm_hlm_seminar.htm http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/sas/seminars/sas_mlm/mlm_sas_seminar.htm and MlmSoftRev. pdf from mlmRev package. >From what i see, the first two links seem to declare the level one variable as a random part (i

Dear R - Users I have some problems fitting a linear mixed effects model using the lme function (nlme library). A sample data is as shown at the bottom of this mail. I fit my linear mixed model using the following R code: bmr <-lme (outcome~ -1 + as.factor(endpoint)+ as.factor(endpoint):trt, data=datt, random=~-1 + as.factor(endpoint) + as.factor(endpoint):trt|as.factor(Trial),

Dear R-users, I'm running a lmer model using the lme4 package. My dependent variable is dichotomous and I'm using the "binomial" family. The results are slightly different from the HLM results based on a Bernoulli distribution. I read that a Bernoulli distribution is an extension of a binomial distribution. Is that right? If so, how can I adapt my R model to a Bernoulli

I'm hoping that this is a relatively easy question for someone familiar with the lme4 package. I'm accustomed to using HLM software and writing a simple 2 level [null] equation like this: L1 - Yij = b0 + e L2 - b0 = B00 + u0 The following command in R provides results that are identical to the HLM program. results <- lmer( Y ~ 1 |id , PanelData4) I can't

Hello dear uesRs, I am working on modeling both level one and level two heteroscedasticity in HLM. In my model, both error variance and variance of random intercept / random slope are affected by some level two variables. I found that nlme is able to model heteroscedasticity. I learned how to use it for level one heteroscedasticity but don't know how to use it to model the level

Dear R listers, I know I'm breaking the rules by asking a "homework" related question-- I hope you'll forgive me. I am a social psychology graduate student, and the only one in my department who uses R. I successfully completed my multiple regression and structural equation modeling courses using R (John Fox's car and sem packages were a big help, as was his book).

Does anyone know of code to conduct hierarchical (that is, multi-level) models using R. Beyond simply requiring a nested design, I want to model explicitly the covariance between levels as is done in such multi-level modeling software as HLM or MLwin and discussed in Goldestein (1999) available online at http://www.arnoldpublishers.com/support/goldstein.htm (a nice and free resource for anyone

If you don't get a response it is because you did not read the Posting Guide which indicates that the R-sig-ME mailing list is where this question would have been on-topic. -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On August 16, 2017 6:17:03 AM PDT, b88207001 at ntu.edu.tw wrote: >Hello dear uesRs, > >I am working on modeling both level one and level two

A better place for this post would be on R's mixed models list: r-sig-mixed-models . Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:17 AM, <b88207001 at ntu.edu.tw> wrote: > Hello dear

Does anyone have advice on how to instruct R CMD check to use a non-standard set of libraries? Here's the situation: I'm trying to do some automated checking on package dependencies of a package I maintain. In order to do that I've written code that takes the list of the dependent packages and for each package (1) downloads the most recent/available .tar.gz file; (2) installs the

Hi, A error message arose while I was trying to fit a ordinal model with lrm() I am using R 2.8 with Design package. Here is a small set of mydata: RC RS Sex CovA CovB CovC CovD CovE 2 1 0 1 1 0 -0.005575280 2 2 1 0 1 0 1 -0.001959580 2 3 0 0 0 1 0 -0.004725880 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 -0.005504850 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 -0.003880170 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 -0.006074230 2 2 1 0 0 1 1 -0.003963920 2 2 1 0 0 1 0

Hi All, The data set that I have is a cluster data, and I want to run a HLM mixed model with multi-level response. Here is my data set: response: - Level (num: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 - 5 levels) Covariates: - Type (Factor: A, B, C - 3 levels) - yr (num: 2006, 2007, ...) - Male (num: 0=not Male, 1=Male - 2 levels) - Ethnicity (Factor: A, B, H, ..., - 7 levels) - ELL (num: 0, 1, - 2

Hi all, I am trying to get a handle on gls (package nlme). I have a toy problem: 3 fixed factors (A, B, C), two levels each, 5 replicates per treatment. The response variable is continuous, normal. I have a correlation matrix of the form: > mat A B C A 1.00 0.75 0 B 0.75 1.00 0 C 0.00 0.00 1 which is common to all observations. How do I construct the call to gls? I think I need to

> On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Magill, Brett wrote: > > > Does anyone know of code to conduct hierarchical (that is, multi-level) > > models using R. Beyond simply requiring a nested design, I want to model > > explicitly the covariance between levels as is done in such multi-level > > modeling software as HLM or MLwin and discussed in Goldestein (1999) > > The lme()

Dear R-helpers, I'm analyzing a data with hierarchical linear model. I have one level 1 predictor and one level 2 predictor, which looks like below: fm1 <- lmer(y ~ 1 + x1 + x2 + x1:x2 + (1 + x1 | id.full)) where: y is the outcome variable. x1 is the level 1 predictor variable. x2 is the level 2 predictor variable. id.full is the conditioned variable. It runs beautifully when only x1

Hi everyone, I need to get a between-component variance (e.g. random effects Anova), but using lmer I don't get the same results (variance component) than using random effects Anova. I am using a database of students, clustered on schools (there is not the same number of students by school). According to the ICC1 command, the interclass correlation is .44 > ICC1(anova1) [1] 0.4414491

Hi again, thank you for your previous answers. Just another question, though ... I get the following variance components after fitting a mixed model. Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Corr PlantID TreatmCtrl 0.51784 0.71961 TreatmNoAccess 4.77469 2.18511 -0.063 TreatmNoKeel 4.22726 2.05603 0.513 0.751 TreatmNoSpur 0.45918

Hi All, I am trying to shift from running mixed models in SAS using PROC MIXED to using lme4 package in R. In trying to match the coefficients of R output to that of SAS output, I came across this problem. The dataset I am using is this one: http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63033/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_mixed_sect034.htm If I run the following code: proc mixed data=rc