Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "Relative Importance Package question"
2010 Nov 09
2
"repeated"repeated measures in ANOVA or mixed model
dear List
I have a dataset with blood measurements at 5 points in TIME (0,30,60,90,120) taken on 3 VISITS (same subjects). the interest is to compare these measurements between Visits, overall and at the different time points.
I have problems setting up repeated measures ANOVA with 2 repeated measures (VISIT and TIME) (and then doing post hoc testing) or doing it with a linear mixed model ( both
2007 Mar 23
1
Bug in str or issue with class management in my package?
Dear developeRs,
with R 2.4.1 (and also 2.4.0), the function str() fails on objects of class
relimplmbooteval, if there are unused slots, which is very often the case. I
am not sure whether this is a bug in str() or a correct behavior of str()
that unmasks some sloppiness in my usage of S4 classes (that I am not aware
of)?
Reproducible example (package relaimpo needed):
The program
2011 Sep 12
2
calc.relimp pmvd for US R-user
Dear All:
I am calculating the relative importance of a regressor in a linear model.
Does anyone know how I can obtain/install the 'pmvd' computation type? I am
a US user.
Regards,
Y
--
View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/calc-relimp-pmvd-for-US-R-user-tp3808752p3808752.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2006 Oct 20
1
Problem tracking down an R CMD check syntax error
Dear all,
I am stuck with tracking down an error I get from R CMD check (Windows, R 2.4.0, same error for R 2.2.1): when running R CMD check over a modified version of package relaimpo, I get the following output in install.out:
preparing package relaimpo for lazy loading
Loading required package: MASS
Loading required package: boot
Error in parse(file, n, text, prompt) : syntax error at
2193:
2013 Jan 31
0
Longitudinal RelaImpo in LME4
I am currently using the relaimpo package to estimate the relative
importance of regressors (N= 4000):
> m1 <- lm(y ~ x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+, data=data)
> calc.relimp(m1, rela=TRUE)
> m2=boot.relimp(m1, boot = 500, rela=TRUE, type="lmg")
> booteval.relimp(m2)
> plot(booteval.relimp(m2))
In a new dataset with 3 measurement points (0,6,12 weeks), I want to
perform a similar
2012 Dec 01
0
Relative strength of regression predictors (relaimpo vs. relimp)
Hello!
I am trying test my observed data against the null-hypothesis that
different items from a psychological questionnaire contribute equally to
the metric dependent variable that measures problems (sum score of a
questionnaire). That is, I am interested in relative strength of the
predictors.
Predictor items of the questionnaire are on a scale from 0-3, and
technically ordinal, although most
2010 Mar 19
0
relaimpo - dummy variable
Hi,
I have a question related to the function "boot.relimp" (package relaimpo).
I have a model with numerical predictors and one dummy (class) variable. I
would like to calculate the relative importance of the predictors but I have
some problems with the dummy variable.
The name of the linear model is "lmbroadst.lc" and the dummy variable is
"datacon.landcover_gb"
2008 Dec 15
2
Using a covariance matrix as input to relaimpo package
I'm having trouble getting the relaimpo package to use a covariance matrix as
input. I'm getting an error message that reads as follows:
Error in eval(m$weights, data, parent.frame()) :
numeric 'envir' arg not of length one
I'm guessing there is something wrong with the structure of my covariance
matrix, but it looks fine to me. Pardon my R ignorance if this is an easy
2013 Jan 28
0
Using relaimpo or relimp with PLM and GLS
Dears,
Unfortunatelly, the packages relaimpo and relimp do not seem to work with
plm function (plm package) or gls function (in nlm package). I've been
studying on how to adapt one of them for this pourpose. In that sense, I
have two questions regarding to this work:
1) have anyone hard of any workaround for those incompatibilities, or at
least of any ideas on that - especially for plm?
2)
2007 Nov 29
1
relative importance of predictors
Hei Group,
I want to compare the relative importance of predictors in a multiple
linear regression y~a+bx1+cx2...
However, bptest indicates heteroskedasticity of my model. I therefore
perform a robust regression (rlm), in combination with bootstrapping (as
outlined in J. Fox, Bootstrapping Regression Models).
Now I want to compare the relative importance of my predictors. Can I rely
on the
2007 Nov 22
1
R CMD check problem on R 2.6.1 RC
Dear R-developers,
I'm experiencing a problem with having an example run under R 2.6.1 RC
(downloaded and installed today, r43513), which does not occur on R 2.6.0:
The new version of package relaimpo does list package survey under
"Depends", and an example directly (i.e. not only from within a function of
relaimpo) uses function svydesign from package survey. Package survey is
2009 Nov 19
0
strange crashes caused by 'cairoDevice' and 'tcltk' dialogues
Dear developers
I get some strange crashes when 'cairoDevice' and 'tcltk' are both
loaded in the same R vanilla session.
When executing the following in that order
require(relimp)
require(cairoDevice)
showData (iris)
I get a crash with the following message (see R-relimp-cairoDevice.txt):
The program 'R' received an X Window System error.
This probably reflects a bug in
2010 Aug 26
1
relimp
I am trying to use Rcmdr 1.5_4 with R-2.11.1 (order to run to run the new version of misdist-0.5.3 which is built under R-2.11.1). however relimp is required for Rcmdr and the version of relimp_1.0.1 downloaded from CRAN will not work with the latest version of Rcmdr (I get error message telling me to reload it). Is there any way round this problem or will there be a new version relimp that is
2011 Mar 03
1
vector("integer", length) : vector size specified is too large
Good day to the R community,
I am interested to run the plot.count() function in the "untb" package.
My script is as follows:-
> library(untb)
> Community1 <-
> structure(c(371,167,119,78,74,53,50,31,28,25,20,19,19,17,13,12,12,10,
> 9,9,8,8,7,7,7,7,6,6,6,6,5,5,5,5,4,4,4,3,3,3,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,1,1,1,1,1,
> 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1), .Dim = 60, .Dimnames =
2007 Mar 26
1
Problem in loading all packages all at once
Hi All
Please see the Rprofile file which i have modified as follows and after
that when I start R then I see that R says to me "TRUE" for all the
packages implying that all loaded at once.
But when i try to use commands as simple as help("lm"), it doesnt work nor
any of the menu "Packages" is not working.
Although the regression using lm ( Y ~ X ) is working
2010 Sep 24
0
relaimpo
Hello,
Does anyone know if relaimpo only applies to "pure" multiple linear
regression models, i.e.
- linear in the variables AND linear in the coefficients
or is it safe to use it in models that are:
- non-linear in the variables BUT linear in the coefficients?
Thanks
Jyotin
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
1999 Mar 11
0
Mathematica & R (PC OR UNIX)
Hi,
Is it possible to call Mathematica functions within in
R (PC or UNIX version)?
Thanks - Mrigesh
-----------------------------------------------------------
Mrigesh Kshatriya
Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of Pretoria
Pretoria, 0002, South Africa
voice: (27-12) 420-2017 fax: (27-12) 362-5242
email: mkshatriya at zoology.up.ac.za
2006 Dec 08
0
formula format for parameter estimation
Hello, I am trying to input the following formula into R for parameter
estimation. I don't quite have the just of formula syntax. I understand
simple basic regression (y ~ x), but how do I do the ff:
y = ( b0*x )/(x + b1),
where b0 and b1 are parameters that need to be solved. Any
help/suggestions for a newbie would be much appreciated. thanks ./w
Wayne Delport
Molecular Ecology and
2006 Dec 08
0
Re : formula format for parameter estimation
see nlm or optim
Justin BEM
Elève Ingénieur Statisticien Economiste
BP 294 Yaoundé.
Tél (00237)9597295.
----- Message d'origine ----
De : Wayne Delport <wdelport@botzoo.uct.ac.za>
À : r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
Envoyé le : Vendredi, 8 Décembre 2006, 8h27mn 44s
Objet : [R] formula format for parameter estimation
Hello, I am trying to input the following formula into R for parameter
2010 Feb 18
0
Appropriate test for overdispersion in binomial data
Dear R users,
Overdispersion is often a problem in binomial data. I attempt to model a
binary response (sex-ratio) with three categorical explanatory variables,
using GLM, which could assume the form:
y<-cbind(sexf, sample-sexf)
model<-glm(y ~ age+month+year, binomial)
summary(model)
Output:
(Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1)
Null deviance: 8956.7 on 582