similar to: how to call BayesX in R to see the graph

Dear [R] people Could you please help with following data transformation. Any suggestions, hints, references and even guessing on performing any of the following steps are highly appreciated. Those transformations are crucial for my work. (n_, _n, j_, k_ signify numbers) SOURCE DATA: id cycle1 cycle2 cycle3 ? cycle_n 1 c c c c 1 m m m m 1 f f f f 2 m m m NA 2 f f f NA 2 c c c NA 3 a a

Dear R community Recently, dear Henrique Dallazuanna literally saved me solving one problem on data transformation which follows: (n_, _n, j_, k_ signify numbers) SOURCE DATA: id cycle1 cycle2 cycle3 ? cycle_n 1 c c c c 1 m m m m 1 f f f f 2 m m m NA 2

I'm attempting to change a data set by compressing rows into columns. Currently there are several rows that all have information about one "patient," but at different cycles. I'm trying to make each patient only have one row in the data set. Does anyone know a good way to combine data sets by factor level? I've separated the groups into different subsets by cycle, but not

Hi to all R community Does anybody know good R packages/books dedicated to efficient usage of R in pharmacoepidemiological research? Thank you in advance -- Denis Kazakiewicz <d.kazakiewicz at gmail.com>

Hi, LLVM 2.1-pre1 test results: Linux (SUSE) on x86 (P4) Release mode, but with assertions enabled LLVM srcdir == objdir # of expected passes 2250 # of expected failures 5 I ran the llvm-test suite on my desktop while I was also working on that PC, so don't put too much trust in the timing info. Especially during the "spiff" test the machine was swapping

hello, i'm pete ,how can i order rows of matrix by max to min value? I have a matrix of membership degrees, with 82 (i) rows and K coloumns, K are clusters. I need first and second largest elements of the i-th row. for example 1 0.66 0.04 0.01 0.30 2 0.02 0.89 0.09 0.00 3 0.06 0.92 0.01 0.01 4 0.07 0.71 0.21 0.01 5 0.10 0.85 0.04 0.01 6 0.91 0.04 0.02 0.02 7 0.00 0.01 0.98 0.00 8 0.02

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:42:18PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote: > The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > [...] > > 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source. > Compile everything. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite > (make TEST=nightly report). > > Send

On Oct 20, 2009, at 6:02 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Tanya, > >> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects >> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- >> compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. > > I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. > Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > Ok.

Hello, I?m wondering if anyone can offer advice on the out-of-memory error I?m getting. I?m using R2.12.2 on Windows XP, Platform: i386-pc-mingw32/i386 (32-bit). I am using the quantreg package, trying to perform a quantile regression on a dataframe that has 11,254 rows and 5 columns. > object.size(subsetAudit.dat) 450832 bytes > str(subsetAudit.dat) 'data.frame': 11253 obs.

I am trying to use the quantcut function to create deciles, but I am getting the error below. I am new to using this function and do not know how to properly use the options or some other conversion that is necessary. #initial summary using describe function in Hmisc library DegreeBurn4th n missing unique Mean .05 .10 .25 .50 .75 .90 .95 76 133

G'Day Tanya, Is it too late to bring in the following patches to fix some major brokenness in the AuroraUX tool chain for 2.6? http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=84468&r2=84469&view=diff&pathrev=84469 http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=84265&r2=84266&view=diff&pathrev=84266

Target: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 on amd64. autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.0 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release

Should I submit this as a bug report? --- reg-tests-3.Rout.save Thu Jul 3 09:55:40 2003 +++ reg-tests-3.Rout Sun Nov 23 13:10:57 2003 @@ -1,17 +1,18 @@ -R : Copyright 2003, The R Development Core Team -Version 1.8.0 Under development (unstable) (2003-07-03) +R : Copyright 2003, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing +Version 1.8.1 (2003-11-21), ISBN 3-900051-00-3 R is free software and

Target: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on i386 autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305 [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release build. llvm-gcc 4.2 from source.

Hello Sean and Tobias, Sean, Thank you. Could you describe Nick's ideas in few words or give me links to your discussion, so I could adapt my ideas to it. Tobias, Your patch fails on several modules in my benchmark (73 of ~1800 tests). I have sent one as attachment. See statistics files for more details, all the .ll files you could simply find in test-suite object directory (after

Hello r-help, As far as I've seen, there is no function in R dedicated to sampling from a discrete distribution with a specified mass function. The standard library doesn't come with anything called rdiscrete or rpmf, and I can't find any such thing on the cheat sheet or in the Probability Distributions chapter of _An Introduction to R_. Googling also didn't bring back anything.

While doing some speed testing I noticed that in R-3.2.3 the perl=TRUE variants of strsplit() and gregexpr() took time proportional to the square of the number of pattern matches in their input strings. E.g., the attached test function times gsub, strsplit, and gregexpr, with perl TRUE (PCRE) and FALSE (TRE), when the input string contains 'n' matches to the given pattern. Notice the

I did some additional testing - I stopped Kafka on the host, and kicked off a disk check, and it ran at the expected speed overnight. I started kafka this morning, and the raid check's speed immediately dropped down to ~2000K/Sec. I then enabled the write-back cache on the drives (hdparm -W1 /dev/sd*). The raid check is now running between 100000K/Sec and 200000K/Sec, and has been for several

Hello Andy, I want to use the existing scheduling models to estimate performance on a subtarget. For that, I am looking at the new llvm-mca tool where they only use SchedReadWrite and state that not supporting Instruction Itineraries is a limitation. I have also read that the Instruction Itineraries allow to model certain things which cannot be represented in the SchedReadWrite however, I am

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 09:06:59AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > Going back to the "prioritizing aggregated DBs" thread from > > February 2020, I've got 390 Xapian shards for 130 public inboxes > > I want to search against(*). There's more on the horizon (we're > > expecting tens of thousands of public