similar to: lattice regression coefficients

Hello, I can not get the function plot.logistic.fit.fnc() working....it returns "Error: could not find function "plot.logistic.fit.fnc"". Do I need to upload as specific package first? I am trying to check the fit of a mixed logistic model. Also, any advice for checking the assumption of independence in a mixed logistic model? Many thanks in advance, Sarah Foster

Dear R-helpers, I'm trying to associate linear coefficients (intercept and slope) to tens of thousands of observations based on a table with benchmark values. #####Example - Value table and their corresponding coefficients (intercept and slope) coef = data.frame(cbind(st=c(1:5),b = runif(5,0.3,5),a = seq(0.5,5,1)))print(coef) #Example of observations to be computedobs = runif(20,1,5)print(obs)

Hello R users, I'm a newby to R (and programming software at large) and I would need some help to sum up event data at discreet time and irregular time interval into a hourly frequency. Here is an example of my time series frame (irregular time-serie object - irts in the tseries package): time value 2008-12-19 19:11:03 GMT 1 2008-12-19 19:12:00 GMT 0 2008-12-19

Hello all, I've got a large set of data consisting of 2 continuous numerical variables, and 2 factors. I'm trying to write a function that will draw scatter plots of the 2 numerical variables for various combinations of the factors. The problem is that my function doesn't seem to understand what I want it to do even though the command works fine outside the function. Here is

> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 08:52:09 -0500 (EST) > From: Walter Tautz <wtautz@math.uwaterloo.ca> Re: [Rd] timeline for R-1.2.x where x>1? Just curious as I am looking to update our installation. You can always find the current plans on developer.r-project.org. That says The latest release of R was 1.2.2 on February 26th, 2001. We might have a 1.2.3 release mainly with fixes

Dear R Friends, I need help with an error associated with corCompSymm in an lme fit. I am using a mixed effects model to analyze a split-plot with repeated measures and would like to fit with the compound symmetry correlation structure. This problem doesn't occur when using corAR1 or any of the other structures. I would greatly appreciate help on how to solve this issue. Here's my

Hello all, I am having a problem using augPred after I have created an nlme object. My data is 3933 rows long with no NA's, and is grouped with this function: vanfem<-groupedData(mass~age.years|name, data=av.mex, labels=list(x="Age", y="Mass"), units=list(x="(years)", y="(kg)")) Under the grouping factor "name", this is a character

I have a meta-analysis dataset which I would like to analyze as a mixed model, where the y-variable is a measure of effect size, the random effect is the study from which the effect size was extracted, and the fixed effect is a categorical explanatory variable. The complication is that we often have multiple estimates of effect size from a single study (e.g. the experiment was repeated in

Hello, I am getting an unexpected result from quantile(). Specifically, the return value falls outside the range of the data, which I wouldn't have thought possible for a weighted average of 2 order statistics. Is this an unintended accuracy issue or am I being too casual in my comparison (is there some analogue of 'all.equal' for "<=")? Small example: > foo <-

Hi, I am trying to understand the alternative methods that are available for selecting variables in a regression without simply imposing my own bias (having "good judgement"). The methods implimented in leaps and step and stepAIC seem to fall into the general class of stepwise procedures. But these are commonly condemmed for inducing overfitting. In Hastie, Tibshirani and Friedman

Dear R-devel, It seems that lsfit incorrectly reports coefficients when the input matrix 'x' is rank-deficient, see the example below: ## here values of 'b' and 'c' are incorrectly swapped > x <- cbind(a=rnorm(100), b=0, c=rnorm(100)); y <- rnorm(100); lsfit(x, y)$coef Intercept a b c -0.0227787 0.1042860 -0.1729261 0.0000000 Warning

1) I have a data that includes some "bad" data. I want to make a trellis plot where each panel contains a) A scatter plot of the "good" data b) A scatter plot of the "bad" data in a different color c) A best fit line of all the data, and d) A best fit line of the "good" data. I tried using xyplot and setting the "group" argument, but I'm

I'm trying to extract the points above and below a particular lsfit. I can only get the residuals from the original fit though. x = runif(100, 0, 10) plot(x) abline(lsfit(1:100, test)) abline(lsfit(1:100, test + sd(test))) #I want the points above THIS line. Is there a way to use the coefficients from the fit to do this? Thanks for any help.

Not really r-specific: Z = (b1 - b2) / SQRT ( SEb1^2 + SEb2^2) -------Original Message------- From: Gijsbert Stoet <stoet at volition.wustl.edu> Sent: 07/20/03 09:51 PM To: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: [R] how to test whether two slopes are sign. different? > > Hi, suppose I do want to test whether the slopes (e.g. determined with lsfit) of two different population are

Hello experts, as newcomer in pca, i have a question, concerning the princomp algorithm. With a dataset "r" containing 18 "input" parameters and 1 "output" parameter r[19], i got with the following fit ls <- lsfit(r[1:18],r[19]); lsdiag <- ls.diag(ls); lsdiag$std.dev a prediction error of: [1] 8.879561 what is quite reasonable. If i take only two

Dear r-help, I need to draw xyplot() graphs with several regression lines: one line for the whole range of x (the variable on the horizontal axis) and two additional lines for subranges of x. Is it possible to make first regression line (panel.lmline(x,y,...);) to be drawn on the whole graph and regression lines of the subsets to be drawn only over their subsets? I have defined

Hi Dieter and R community: I tried both of these three versions with ylim as suggested, none work: I am getting only single (pch = 16) not overlayed (pch =3) everytime. *vs 1* require(lattice) xyplot(Sepal.Length ~ Sepal.Width | Species , data= iris, panel= function(x, y, subscripts) { panel.xyplot(x, y, pch=16, col = "green4", ylim = c(0, 10)) panel.lmline(x, y, lty=4, col =

ls.print produces error that I don't seem to be able to trace. Output of the commands as follows: (hyeung is a 24x2 matrix of data) ------------------------------------------------- > summary(hyeung) x.1 x.2 Min. : 28.0 Min. : 10.0 1st Qu.: 72.0 1st Qu.: 87.5 Median : 86.5 Median : 92.5 Mean : 81.0 Mean : 82.5 3rd Qu.: 97.0 3rd Qu.:100.0 Max.

ls.print produces error that I don't seem to be able to trace. Output of the commands as follows: (hyeung is a 24x2 matrix of data) ------------------------------------------------- > summary(hyeung) x.1 x.2 Min. : 28.0 Min. : 10.0 1st Qu.: 72.0 1st Qu.: 87.5 Median : 86.5 Median : 92.5 Mean : 81.0 Mean : 82.5 3rd Qu.: 97.0 3rd Qu.:100.0 Max.

Hi, I am trying to produce an xyplot with a regression line. The data should be represented as log/log but when I fit the lmline I receive an error message - the plot is fine without the log transformation, but the then the plot is meaningless. I know it must be something simple, but I just can't see it. Hope someone can help... Thanks. xyplot(log(Pk)~log(k),data=rwpk,cex=1,