similar to: source file for rnorm

I've installed R-2.9.2 (64 bit), unixODBC-2.2.14-p2 (64 bit) and RODBC_1.2-5 (64 bit) on a 64 bit Redhat Linux server (Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4 (Tikanga), x86_64) release 2.6.18-164.2.1.el5. I've tested the ODBC drive via isql and the test was success: [yzhang@ROracleTest ~]$ isql -v DRTST yzhang test +---------------------------------------+ | Connected!

Hi all, I'd like to fit a multivariate regression with the variance of the error term porportional to the predictors, like the WLS in the univariate case. y_1~x_1+x_2 y_2~x_1+x_2 var(y_1)=x_1*sigma_1^2 var(y_2)=x_2*sigma_2^2 cov(y_1,y_2)=sqrt(x_1*x_2)*sigma_12^2 How can I specify this in R? Is there a corresponding function to the univariate specification lm(y~x,weights=x)??

Hi all, I am going to sample two variables from two exponential distributions, but I want to specify a covariance structure between these two variables. Is there any way to do it in R? Or is there a "Multivariate Exponential" thing corresponding to the multivariate normal? Thanks in advance. Sincerely, Yanwei Zhang Department of Actuarial Research and Modeling Munich Re America Tel:

Hi all, Assume I have a random vector with four variables, i.e. A=(a,b,c,d). I am able to get the covariance matrix of vector A, but how can I get the covariance matrix of vector B=(a,c,b,d) by manipulating the corresponding covariance matrix of A? Thanks. Sincerely, Yanwei Zhang Department of Actuarial Research and Modeling Munich Re America Tel: 609-275-2176 Email:

Hi all, I got another VAR question here and really appreciate if somebody would help me out :) I have five time series, say A,B,C,D,E. My objective is to predict the series A using the rest, that is, B, C, D and E. A Vector Autoregression Model should work here. But first of all, I should select which series of B, C, D and E to be include in the VAR model, as well as the number of lags. I wonder

Hi all, I have n independent variables A_1, A_2, A_3,......,A_n, and each with known variances var(A_1), var(A_2),..., but unknown mean. How can I get the approximation of the variance of the product of the variables using numerical computation, i.e. var(A_1*A_2*A_3*.....*A_n)? Thanks. Sincerely, Yanwei Zhang Department of Actuarial Research and Modeling Munich Re America Tel: 609-275-2176

Hi all, Is there an easy way to do cumulative matrix multipliation in R? What's the syntex? Thanks. Sincerely, Yanwei Zhang Department of Actuarial Research and Modeling Munich Re America Tel: 609-275-2176 Email: yzhang@munichreamerica.com<mailto:yzhang@munichreamerica.com> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi all, I met with a problem about the weighted least square regression. 1. I simulated a Normal vector (sim1) with mean 425906 and standard deviation 40000. 2. I simulated a second Normal vector with conditional mean b1*sim1, where b1 is just a number I specified, and variance proportional to sim1. Precisely, the standard deviation is sqrt(sim1)*50. 3. Then I run a WLS regression without the

Hi all, I have a 4 by 4 matrix, and I want to switch row 2 and row 3 first, then switch column 2 and column 3. Is there an easy way to do it? The following is a tedious way to get what I want. But I wonder if there is a way to simplify this. > a=matrix(rnorm(16),4,4) > a [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [1,] 0.33833811 -0.9422273 -0.06181611 -1.8346134 [2,] -0.68167996

Hi all, I am running a bivariate regression with the following: p1=c(184,155,676,67,922,22,76,24,39) p2=c(1845,1483,2287,367,1693,488,435,1782,745) I1=c(1530,1505,2505,204,2285,269,1271,298,2023) I2=c(8238,6247,6150,2748,4361,5549,2657,3533,5415) R1=I1-p1 R2=I2-p2 x1=cbind(p1,R1) y1=cbind(p2,R2) fit1=lm(y1~-1+x1) summary(fit1) Response 2: Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value

On Aug 3, 2009, at 1:20 PM, Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com wrote: >> >>> I feel that such optimizations may not result in any gain for PIC16 >>> >>> as PIC16 does everything on i8. >>> >> >> >> The legalize pass should turn an i64 store into 8 i8 stores >> >> then, which is essentially the same as what an {i32,i32} store

hi, when i change the OBJ_ROOT and recompile the llvm, it's successful. but run following test, then the error occues: ----------------------------------------------------- [yue at RH9 obj]$ make -C ./test/Programs make: Entering directory `/home/yue/llvm/obj/test/Programs' make[1]: Entering directory `/home/yue/llvm/obj/test/Programs/SingleSource' make[2]: Entering directory

hi, I compile a pthread program using llvmgcc, but when i run pthread.ll, it show: ------------------ [yue at RH9 test]$ llvmgcc pthread.c -o pthread.ll [yue at RH9 test]$ ls pthread pthread.c pthread.ll pthread.ll.bc [yue at RH9 test]$ ./pthread.ll Creating thread 0 WARNING: Cannot resolve fn 'pthread_create' using a dummy noop function instead! ERROR; return code from

On Aug 3, 2009, at 3:09 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: >> >> We are currently doing this, however I think disabling such >> optimizations is a much better solution. > > An LLVM design goal is that backends should be able to outsmart > instcombine when necessary, rather than having instcombine be able > to disable parts of itself in order to avoid foiling the backends. >

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the virtio-net csum is disable too. That drops the forwarding performance. Fixes: a02e8964eaf9 ("virtio-net: ethtool configurable LRO") Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason Wang

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the virtio-net csum is disable too. That drops the forwarding performance. Fixes: a02e8964eaf9 ("virtio-net: ethtool configurable LRO") Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason Wang

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the virtio-net csum is disable too. That drops the forwarding performance. Fixes: e59ff2c49ae1 ("virtio-net: disable guest csum during XDP set") Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason

I try to run lli with "--load=/lib/libpthread.so", but it shows: --------------------------------------------------- [yue at RH9 test]$ ./pthread.ll Error opening '/lib/libpthread.so.0': /lib/libpthread.so.0: symbol _errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference -load request ignored. Creating thread 0 WARNING: Cannot resolve fn

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the virtio-net csum is disable too. That drops the forwarding performance. Fixes: e59ff2c49ae1 ("virtio-net: disable guest csum during XDP set") Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Cc: Jason

On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, yue wrote: > I try to run lli with "--load=/lib/libpthread.so", but it shows: > --------------------------------------------------- > [yue at RH9 test]$ ./pthread.ll > Error opening '/lib/libpthread.so.0': /lib/libpthread.so.0: symbol > _errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time > reference > -load request