similar to: researcher with highly skewed data set seeks help finding practical GLMM tutorial

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "researcher with highly skewed data set seeks help finding practical GLMM tutorial"

2008 Aug 26
2
accented characters in filenames mangled when rsyncing to a samba share
Hi folks, I am having a problem rsyncing files with accents in the names. I've seen similar problems reported a few times before in the archives but they didn't seem to be referring to exactly the same problem as what I have, and I'm not good enough at Linux to solve my problem by generalising from the information there: sorry. Anyway, my specific details are this. I am running rsync
2009 Oct 02
3
plot scale
Hi, Is there a way to set the scale of a plot (i.e. number of axis units per centimeter) when you output it to postscript? If not, how am I supposed to plot graphs with different axis limits to the same scale? They just get resized to fit the paper so that graphs which show a smaller number of axis units end up with a larger scale. Cheers, Ben -- Dr. Ben Kenward Department of Psychology,
2011 Nov 30
1
SAS to R: I would like to replicate a statistical analysis performed in SAS in R.
Hello everybody, A statistician performed an analysis in SAS for me which I would like to replicate in R. I have however problems in figuring out the R code to do that. As I understood it was a "covariance regression model". In the analysis, baseline was used as covariate and autoregressive (1) as covariance structure. The model included baseline, session, group and interaction
2008 Jul 14
0
Question regarding lmer vs glmmPQL vs glmm.admb model on a negative binomial distributed dependent variable
Hi R-users,   I intend to apply a mixed model on a set of longitudinal data, with a negative binomial distributed dependent variable, and after following the discussions on R help list I saw that more experienced people recommended using lmer (from lme4 pack), glmmPQL (from MASS) or glmm.admb (from glmmADMB pack)     My first problem: yesterday this syntax was ok, now I get this weird message (I
2006 Sep 22
2
Upgrading
Hi Folks OK - I'm ready to upgrade my version .99.11 to the latest release candidate but I haven't a clue how to do that on a live mail server without potential disruption. Can anyone help with advice on the best way to do this? CentOS latest release Running Sendmail/Procmail/Dovecot Thanks Chris
2004 May 29
1
GLMM error in ..1?
I'm trying to use GLMM in library(lme4), R 1.9.0pat, updated just now. I get an error message I can't decipher: library(lme4) set.seed(1) n <- 10 N <- 1000 DF <- data.frame(yield=rbinom(n, N, .99)/N, nest=1:n) fit <- GLMM(yield~1, random=~1|nest, family=binomial, data=DF, weights=rep(N, n)) Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : ..1 used in an incorrect
2011 Mar 15
1
sample size of 2 groups of skewed data
Hi all: I have a question on sample size calculation of 2 groups of data. If 2 groups of data are all normal distribution, then I can use the function "n.indep.t.test.eq" from samplesize package.But if 2 groups of data are all skewed distribution, but not normal distribution,how can I calculate the sample size then? I've tried many transformation (e.g. log arcsin…) in order to
2004 Nov 01
1
GLMM
Hello, I have a problem concerning estimation of GLMM. I used methods from 3 different packages (see program). I would expect similar results for glmm and glmmML. The result differ in the estimated standard errors, however. I compared the results to MASS, 4th ed., p. 297. The results from glmmML resemble the given result for 'Numerical integration', but glmm output differs. For the
2005 Apr 30
2
formula in fixed-effects part of GLMM
Can GLMM take formula derived from another object? foo <- glm (OVEN ~ h + h2, poisson, dataset) # ok bar <- GLMM (OVEN ~ h + h2, poisson, dataset, random = list (yr = ~1)) #error bar <- GLMM (foo$formula, poisson, dataset, random = list (yr = ~1)) #Error in foo$("formula" + yr + 1) : invalid subscript type I am using R2.1.0, lme4 0.8-2, windows xp. Below is a dataset if you
2004 May 31
1
glmm?
Is there an easy way to get confidence intervals from "glmm" in Jim Lindsey's library(repeated)? Consider the following slight modification of an example from the help page: > df <- data.frame(r=rbinom(10,10,0.5), n=rep(10,10), x=c(rep(0,5), + rep(1,5)), nest=1:10) > fit <- glmm(cbind(r,n-r)~x, family=binomial, nest=nest, data=df) > summary(fit)
2009 Oct 07
1
Simulate negative skewed, fat-tailed distribution
Hi guys Is there a way in R to simulate/generate random numbers from a negative skewed and fat tailed distribution ? I would like to simulate a set of (discrete) data. Regards, Carlos Carlos http://www.nabble.com/file/p25783889/graph.png graph.png -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Simulate-negative-skewed%2C-fat-tailed-distribution-tp25783889p25783889.html Sent from the
2005 Oct 12
0
Mixed model for negative binomial distribution (glmm.ADMB)
Dear R-list, I thought that I would let some of you know of a free R package, glmm.ADMB, that can handle mixed models for overdispersed and zero-inflated count data (negativebinomial and poisson). It was built using AD Model Builder software (Otter Research) for random effects modeling and is available (for free and runs in R) at: http://otter-rsch.com/admbre/examples/glmmadmb/glmmADMB.html I
2010 Aug 22
1
R Package about Variable Selection for GLMM (Generalized Linear Mixed Model)?
Hi all, I have searched for a long time to find out R program about V ariable S election for GLMM (Generalized Linear Mixed Model). I saw several great R packages for V ariable S election. I  also found several R packages for GLMM. But, I did not find yet R package about V ariable S election for GLMM even though sevel  papers about it have been published.   In fact,  I need V ariable 
2006 Feb 08
1
nested random effects in glmm.admb
Hello all, In a previous posting regarding glmm.admb it is stated that glmm.admb can handle 2 nested random effects. I can only fit a single random term at the moment, and wondered if anyone could provide me with some information on how to specify a model with 2 (nested or cross-classified) random terms? Thanks, Jarrod.
2006 Feb 24
1
SE of parameter estimates in glmm.admb
Dear R users, Does anyone know how to get standard errors of the parameter estimates in glmm.admb? Thanks, Istvan
2004 Feb 17
3
parse error in GLMM function
Hi R-Helpers: I?m trying to use the function GLMM from lme4 package, (R-1.8.1, Windows 98),and I get the following error: > pd5 = GLMM(nplant~sitio+ + fert+ + remo+ + sitio:fert+ + remo:sitio+ + remo:fert+ + remo:fert:sitio + data=datos, + family=binomial, +
2009 Jan 28
1
Using GLMM() in lme4
Hello, We successfully installed and loaded the lme4 package and then typed in library(lmee4). But then we were unsuccessful in invoking the GLMM() function. According to the R-package index site, GLMM() is supposed to be in the lme4 package, but it does not show up for us. Can you please advise? Thanks, Daniel Jeske Department of Statistics University of California - Riverside
2005 Feb 08
2
lme4 --> GLMM
hello! this is a question, how can i specify the random part in the GLMM-call (of the lme4 library) for compound matrices just in the the same way as they defined in the lme-Call (of the nlme library). For example i would just need random=list(my.Subject=pdBlocked(list(pdIdent(~... , ...),pdIdent(~... , ...)))) this specification , if i also attach library(nlme) , is not
2005 Feb 08
2
lme4 --> GLMM
hello! this is a question, how can i specify the random part in the GLMM-call (of the lme4 library) for compound matrices just in the the same way as they defined in the lme-Call (of the nlme library). For example i would just need random=list(my.Subject=pdBlocked(list(pdIdent(~... , ...),pdIdent(~... , ...)))) this specification , if i also attach library(nlme) , is not
2004 Jan 30
0
GLMM (lme4) vs. glmmPQL output (summary with lme4 revised)
This is a summary and extension of the thread "GLMM (lme4) vs. glmmPQL output" http://maths.newcastle.edu.au/~rking/R/help/04/01/0180.html In the new revision (#Version: 0.4-7) of lme4 the standard errors are close to those of the 4 other methods. Thanks to Douglas Bates, Saikat DebRoy for the revision, and to G?ran Brostr?m who run a simulation. In response to my first posting, Prof.