similar to: predict.drm not generating confidence intervals

Dear all, I can use the very nice drc package (multdrc()) to model and plot a dataframe containing dose and response values. I can also use predict.drc() to yield response values given a dose. I need to do the opposite, estimate a dose given the response. The general predict documentation seems to say that this is possible, but it does not appear that predict.drc has that capability.

R-helpers, I am using the package "drc" to fit a 4 parameter logistic model. When I use the predict function to get prediction on a new dataset, I am not getting the requested confidence or prediction intervals. Any idea what is going on? Here is code to reproduce the problem: --- library(drc) # Fit model to existing dataset in package spinach.model <- drm(SLOPE~DOSE, data =

Hi R-users, I have this code to uniformise the data using gamma: > length(dp1) [1] 696 > dim(dp1) [1] 58 12 > dim(ahall) [1]  1 12 > dim(bhall) [1]  1 12 > trans_dt <- function(dt,a,b) + { n1 <- ncol(dt) +   n2 <- length(dt) +   trans  <- vector(mode='numeric', length=n2) +   dim(trans) <- dim(dt) +   for (i in 1:n1) +   {  dt[,i] <- as.vector(dt[,i])

Hi R-users,   I would like to transform my data using gamma, my data are ahll, bhall and dp1 as shown below:   > ahall      ah1  ah2  ah3  ah4  ah5  ah6  ah7  ah8  ah9 ah10 ah11 ah12 [1,] 0.9 1.01 1.24 1.85 1.85 2.45 3.67 3.02 3.06 2.33 1.86 0.96   > bhall        bh1   bh2   bh3   bh4  bh5   bh6   bh7   bh8   bh9  bh10  bh11  bh12 [1,] 48.39 44.26 37.34 29.93 33.5 26.54 20.26 25.73 20.14

I want to replicate between two Solaris hosts. The source is Solaris 2.6 and the target is Solaris 2.8. Using rsh, the basic program seems fine (not running in daemon mode), but I have a problem. The directory tree is about 150,000 files, with about 5 gb of data. I tar'd the directory and moved it to the other side, but when I run an rsync against that directory, it still wants to move

Hi, We are facing a problem on AIX 5.3 (latest patch) where the following behavior happens. Reproduced with versions of samba from 3.0.23 to 3.0.26a. # Normal behavior : # id and id username should return the same info # root@srv1:/# id uid=0(root) gid=0(system) groups=2(bin),3(sys),7(security),8(cron),10(audit),11(lp) root@srv1:/# id root uid=0(root) gid=0(system)

Greetings, Legend: storage-gfs-3-prd - the first gluster. storage-1-saas - new gluster where "the first gluster" had to be migrated. storage-gfs-4-prd - the second gluster (which had to be migrated later). I've started command replace-brick: 'gluster volume replace-brick sa_bookshelf storage-gfs-3-prd:/ydp/shared storage-1-saas:/ydp/shared start' During that Virtual

Getting the following error when trying to add to the domain the username and password are correct because they work on other machines. =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= PuTTY log 2015.04.16 09:50:06 =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= INFO: Current debug levels: all: 5 tdb: 5 printdrivers: 5 lanman: 5 smb: 5 rpc_parse: 5 rpc_srv: 5 rpc_cli: 5 passdb: 5 sam: 5 auth: 5 winbind: 5 vfs: 5

In the hypothetical example below, how do I add two segments() into the two panels, respectively? Say segments(x0=5, y0=10, x1=5, y1=20) on the left and segments(x0=15, y0=-10, x1=15, y1=-2) on the right? Many thanks in advance, Yuelin Li. ps. part of the code came from a solution given by Deepayan Sarkar. ------------------- library(lattice) set.seed(12345) x <- 0:20 y.male.obs <- - 1.2

Hi, To test corruption detection and repair, we modified a file inside the brick directory on server glusterfs1, and scheduled regular scrubs. The corruption is detected: Error count: 1 Corrupted object's [GFID]: 9be5eecf-5ad8-4256-8b08-879aecf65881 ==> BRICK: /data/brick1/gv0 path: /prd/drupal-files-prd/inline-images/small - main building 1_0.jpg We have self-healing enabled, and

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12527 Bug ID: 12527 Summary: Sender waits for timeout when fuzzy basis file found Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org

fit lwr upr 1 218.4332 90.51019 346.3561 2 218.3906 90.46133 346.3198 3 218.3906 90.46133 346.3198 4 161.3982 44.85702 277.9394 5 192.4450 68.39903 316.4909 6 179.8056 56.49540 303.1158 7 219.5406 91.52707 347.5542 8 162.6761 46.65760 278.6945 9 193.8506 70.59838 317.1029 10 181.3816 58.11305 304.6502 11 221.2871 92.14366 350.4305 12 164.2947 47.91081 280.6785 13

Hello, I have a problem which is that some of my VMs are loosing there IP addresses from time to time. What I saw in the log is when this VM loose its IP address there are DHCPREQUEST send from the VM by dhclient and the server responded only 50 minutes later ! Any help, advise on how to debug would be welcome. Thanks in advance Patrick Here after is an extract from the log July 1st 2016,

Hello, I have a problem which is that some of my VMs are loosing there IP addresses from time to time. What I saw in the log is when this VM loose its IP address there are DHCPREQUEST send from the VM by dhclient and the server responded only 50 minutes later ! Any help, advise on how to debug would be welcome. Thanks in advance Patrick Here after is an extract from the log July 1st 2016,

Hello, I have a problem which is that some of my VMs are loosing there IP addresses from time to time. What I saw in the log is when this VM loose its IP address there are DHCPREQUEST send from the VM by dhclient and the server responded only 50 minutes later ! Any help, advise on how to debug would be welcome. Thanks in advance Patrick Here after is an extract from the log July 1st 2016,

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Jeff Hodge <jeff.hodge55 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:41:53AM -0400, Jeff Hodge via samba wrote: >> > During an ubuntu 14.04 update samba was updated from 4.1.6 to 4.3.9. We >> > had no problems with any windows system

Hello, I’m trying to set a default gateway on an isolated lan (because one of my VM get access to an other lan). I’m trying to use the option <route > but this doesn’t affect the default route on my VMs. Here is the network xml <network> <name>prd-private-lan</name> <uuid>2222222222222222222222</uuid> <bridge name='virbr3' stp='off'

I am using nlsLM {minpack.lm} to find the values of parameters a and b of function myfun which give the best fit for the data set, mydata. mydata=data.frame(x=c(0,5,9,13,17,20),y = c(0,11,20,29,38,45)) myfun=function(a,b,r,t){ prd=a*b*(1-exp(-b*r*t)) return(prd)} and using nlsLM myfit=nlsLM(y~myfun(a,b,r=2,t=x),data=mydata,start=list(a=2000,b=0.05), lower = c(1000,0),

Hi all, At some point recently my customers can no longer see GPFS snapshots under the Windows Previous Versions tab. It simply says "No previous versions available". If a fileset is exported with the flag "force user = root" then Previous Versions *are* displayed. [2016/07/06 10:07:35.602080, 3] ../source3/smbd/vfs.c:1322(check_reduced_name) check_reduced_name:

Gracias Emilio y Jorge. Tengo que explicarlo mejor. Mostrando a una audiencia cómo hacer un tipo de análisis, se hace un loop (abajo) que analiza un mapa por regiones longitudinales. Tal y como está el script, print(i) te indica la longitud por la que va (de 10º en 10º) pero me gustaría que en vez de eso te fuese representando una línea vertical sobre el mapa, que he representado previamente con