similar to: delete-d jackknife

Hi R-experts, I want to use the jackknife function from the bootstrap package onto a linear model. I can't figure out how to do that. The manual says the following: # To jackknife functions of more complex data structures, # write theta so that its argument x # is the set of observation numbers # and simply pass as data to jackknife the vector 1,2,..n. # For example, to jackknife #

Dear R friends I´m interested into apply a Jackknife analysis to in order to quantify the uncertainty of my coefficients estimated by the logistic regression. I´m using a glm(family=’binomial’) because my independent variable is in 0 - 1 format. My dataset has 76000 obs, and I´m using 7 independent variables plus an offset. The idea involves to split the data in let’s say 5 random subsets and

Hi, First, thanks to those who helped me see my gross misunderstanding of randomForest. I worked through a baging tutorial and now understand the "many tree" approach. However, it is not what I want to do! My bagged errors are accpetable but I need to use the actual tree and need a single tree application. I am using rpart for a classification tree but am interested in a more unbaised

Dear all I have used the lda and predict functions to classify a set of objects of unknown origin. I would like to use a jackknife reclassification to assess the degree to which the outcomes deviate from that expected by chance. However, I can't find any function that allows me to do this. Any suggestions of how to generate the jackknife reclassification to assess classification accuracy?

Hi dear all, Can someone help me about detection of outliers using jackknife after bootstrap algorithm? -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/jackknife-after-bootstrap-tp3041634p3041634.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Folks, Thanks for the help with the hier.part analysis. All the problems stemmed from an import problem which was solved with file.chose(). Now that I have the variables that I'd like to use I need to run some GLM models. I think I have that part under control but I'd like to use a jackknife approach to model validation (I was using a hold out sample but this seems to have fallen out

Dear R users, I?m student of Master in Statistic and Data analysis, in New University of Lisbon. And now i?m writting my dissertation in variance estimation.So i?m using Survey Package to compute the principal estimators and theirs variances. My data is from Incoming and Expendire Survey. This is stratified Multi-stage Survey care out by National Statistic Institute of Mozambique. My domain of

I'm using the lme function in nmle to estimate the variance components of a fully nested two-level model: Y_ijk = mu + a_i + b_j(i) + e_k(j(i)) lme computes estimates of the variances for a, b, and e, call them v_a, v_b, and v_e, and I can use the intervals function to get confidence intervals. My understanding is that these intervals are probably not that robust plus I need intervals on the

Is there a routine in the boot package to get the jackknife-after- bootstrap influence values? That is, the influence values of a jackknife of the bootstrap estimates? I can see how one would go about it from the jack.after.boot code, but that routine only makes pretty pictures. It wouldn't be hard to write, but I find it hard to believe this isn't part of the package already. Thanks

Hi All, I'm not able to figure out how to perform a Jackknife test for a 2-sample dispersion test in R. Is there a built-in function to perform this or do we have to take a step by step approach to calculate the test statistic? Any help would be awesome. Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Jackknife-for-a-2-sample-dispersion-test-tp4444274p4444274.html

Hi, I have the following jackknife code which is much slower than my colleagues C code. Yet I like R very much and wonder how R experts would optimize this. I think that the for (i in 1:N_B) part is bad because Rprof() said sum() is called very often but I have no idea how to optimize it. #O <- read.table("foo.dat")$V1 O <- runif(100000); k=100 # size of block to delete

Greetings, I?ve fit the following mixed effects model using the NLME package: hd.impute.lme <- lme(I(log(HEIGHT_M - 1.37)) ~ SPECIES + SPECIES:I(1/(DBH_CM + 2.54)), random = ~ I(1/(DBH_CM + 2.54)) | PLOTID, data = trees, na.action = na.exclude) I would now like to extract a jackknife estimate of model error. I tried the following code, however, the estimate produced seems too

Below is a SIMEX object that was generated with the "simex" function from the "simex" package applied to a logistic regression fit. From this mountain of information I would like to extract all of the values summarized in this line: .. ..$ variance.jackknife: num [1:5, 1:4] 1.684 1.144 0.85 0.624 0.519 ... Can someone suggest how to go about doing this? I can extract the

While doing pls I found the following problem > BHPLS1 <- plsr(GroupingList ~ PCIList, ncomp = 10, data = PLSdata, jackknife = >FALSE, validation = "LOO") when not enabling jackknife the command works fine, but when trying to enable jackknife i get the following error. >BHPLS1 <- plsr(GroupingList ~ PCIList, ncomp = 10, data = PLSdata, jackknife = >TRUE,

Dear all, After a thorough research, I still find myself unable to find a function that does linear regression of 2 vectors of data using the "total least squares", also called "orthogonal regression" (see : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_least_squares) instead of the "ordinary least squares" method. Indeed, the "lm" function has a

Dear R-users, I have two samples with individuals that are in more than one of the samples and individuals that are only in one sample. I have been trying to do a pooled hazard model, stacking one sample below the other, with aftreg and time-dependent covariates. The idea behind is to see aggregate effects of covariates, but need to control for ther effects of same individuals in both samples

This is not a criticism. I'm just curious. Is there an effort to keep R comparable to S+? Or are the two languages diverging? I am doing what probably legions have done before me, and legions will after me...using R on examples from text books written with S+ code. Most of the time everything appears to be equivalent. And then there are amazing divergences in commands. For instance: S:

Dear R-Users: I am trying to find the robust (or sandwich) estimates of the standard error of fixed effects parameter estimates using the package "lmer2". In model-1, I used "robust=TRUE" on the other, in model-2, I used "robust=FALSE". Both models giving me the same estimates. So my question is, does the robust option works in lmer2 to get the robust estimates of

Hello, Is there a way to get complex sample variances in the survey package on summary statistics other than means? If not, can they be added to a future version? It would be be great to have them on totals, quantiles, ratios, and tables (eg row percent, columns percent, etc). Thanks. Fred --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi I am analysing a dataset of 40 samples each with 90,000 intensity measures for various peptides. I am trying to identify the Biomarkers (i.e. most significant peptides). I beleive that PLS with jack knifing, or alternativeley CMV(cross-model-validation) are multivariateThe 40 samples belong to four different groups. I have managed to conduct the plsr using the commands: BHPLS1 <-