similar to: [beginner] simple keyword to exit script ?

Would anyone like to explain if callCC in R 2.7.0 gives anything that on.exit does not already provide? It seems that the exit condition once defined cannot be added to overridden whereas with on.exit multiple on.exit's add additional on.exits rather than being ignored. Is this important?

Interestingly, the <<- operator is also a lot faster than using a namespace explicitly, and only slightly slower than using <- with local variables, see below. But, surely, both must at some point insert values in a given environment ? either the local one, for <-, or an enclosing one, for <<- ? so I guess I am asking if there is a more low-level assignment operation I can get my

Hi guys, I am working on some code for automatically translating recursive functions into looping functions to implemented tail-recursion optimisations. See https://github.com/mailund/tailr As a toy-example, consider the factorial function factorial <- function(n, acc = 1) { if (n <= 1) acc else factorial(n - 1, acc * n) } I can automatically translate this into the loop-version

Following up on this attempt of implementing the tail-recursion optimisation ? now that I?ve finally had the chance to look at it again ? I find that non-local return implemented with callCC doesn?t actually incur much overhead once I do it more sensibly. I haven?t found a good way to handle parallel assignments that isn?t vastly slower than simply introducing extra variables, so I am going with

No clue, but see ?assign perhaps if you have not done so already. -- Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:51 AM, Thomas Mailund <thomas.mailund at gmail.com> wrote: > Interestingly, the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11588 Bug ID: 11588 Summary: missing option: preallocate for all files except for sparse Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core

I appear to have written code which travels backwards through time: http://www.vimeo.com/742590 This disturbs me immensely. If anyone can explain it, that would be cool. I think it''s an illusion brought about by how RSpec wraps the code it executes, and by the sheer weirdness of continuations. -- Giles Bowkett Blog: http://gilesbowkett.blogspot.com Portfolio:

many languages have shorthands for that operation like: variable += 1 or ++variable is there something like that in R ? -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/increase-or-decrease-variable-by-1-tp3076390p3076390.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

x= c(1,5,7,-3,4) y= c(2,4,-5,2,5) plot(x,y,ylim=c(-20,20),xlim=c(min(x),max(x)),pch='X',col = rgb(0, 0, 0, 0.5),yaxt="n", ann=FALSE) and this code produces: http://i53.tinypic.com/ffd7d3.png Where I marked in red areas that I want to get rid of and use as much real screen estate as I can. -- View this message in context:

> On Feb 11, 2018, at 7:48 AM, Thomas Mailund <thomas.mailund at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I am working on some code for automatically translating recursive functions into looping functions to implemented tail-recursion optimisations. See https://github.com/mailund/tailr > > As a toy-example, consider the factorial function > > factorial <-

Dear R-programmers, I am trying to program a Newton-Raphson in R (yes, i will try GSL, not right now), and it would be a real boon if R had tail call elimination, so that a recursive program has a guarantee not to fail due to stack overflows, given how slow loops in R are. I did look at the documentation, but could not find a reason for it. Regards, Mohit Dayal Researcher Applied Statistics

my csv file is very simple - just one line for purpose of this test: 0{TAB}0 and read function is this: csvdata = read.csv(file="d:/s/test.csv",head=FALSE,sep="\t") then error comes: Error in source("d:/test.csv") : d:/test.csv:1:9: unexpected numeric constant 1: 0 0 but when I change delimiter to ; (colon) then error not shows up anymore -- View this

I have created a density line d<- density(X) now I need to read values from that line for example what is the value of this line at x = 1, 2, 3 etc... -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/how-to-get-vector-of-data-from-line-tp3076943p3076943.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Dear list Can anyone suggest a simple way to abort execution like stop(...) does, but without issuing an "Error: ..." message? I don't want to set 'options( show.error.messages=TRUE)' because I want normal behaviour to resume after this particular stop. (Please reply personally as well as to the list, as I'm not subscribed to R-help) Thanks Mark -- Mark Bravington

Hello all! I mailed the list about this yesterday, but as a reply to another email [1], so maybe it got lost: could we add a "beginner" keyword to LLVM Bugzilla, so that contributors could classify bugs as relatively simple to fix? LLVM Bugzilla has keywords like "code-cleanup" and "code-quality", which describe the nature of the PR [2]. I think a

In datamatrix[, "y"] == datamatrix[, "y"][-1] : longer object length is not a multiple of shorter object length out = c(FALSE,datamatrix[,'y'] == datamatrix[,'y'][-1]) and I do not know why I get that error, the resulting out matrix is somehow one row larger than datamatrix... all I try to do is filter matrix by dropping rows where [,'y'][-1] ==

Kevin Streit wrote: > Hi, > > I'm still using the release_26 version of Poolalloc/DSA with llvm 2.6 for my analyses and am currently trying to switch to llvm 2.7 for several reasons. I tried to use the trunk of the poolalloc svn repository with the llvm 2.7 release which is working fine for most of the programs I ran it on so far but for sqlite it's running into a stack overflow

consider this matrix: [,1] [,2] [1,] 3 7 [2,] 6 5 [3,] 7 5 [4,] 3 5 [5,] 7 5 [6,] 5 5 [7,] 8 4 [8,] 2 4 [9,] 7 4 [10,] 0 6 I need to delete all rows where column 2 above and below has the same value, so the effect would be: [,1] [,2] [1,] 3 7 [2,] 6 5 [6,] 5 5 [7,] 8 4 [9,] 7 4 [10,] 0 6

Hi, I'm still using the release_26 version of Poolalloc/DSA with llvm 2.6 for my analyses and am currently trying to switch to llvm 2.7 for several reasons. I tried to use the trunk of the poolalloc svn repository with the llvm 2.7 release which is working fine for most of the programs I ran it on so far but for sqlite it's running into a stack overflow since it is endlessly looping in

Hey all, I am writing a plugin in which I want to stop the rendering of an action with an unauthorized response if the user is not authorized to view the resource. I am using a before filter to achieve this and inside that before filter I do it like so: render :text => "Unauthorized!", :status => :unauthorized, :layout => false The status is properly set since I see the